Demand for and Occurrence of Medication Cost Conversations: A Narrative Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/10775587221108042
Jordan Everson, Sarah C Henderson, Audrey Cheng, Nicole Senft, Christine Whitmore, Stacie B Dusetzina
{"title":"Demand for and Occurrence of Medication Cost Conversations: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Jordan Everson,&nbsp;Sarah C Henderson,&nbsp;Audrey Cheng,&nbsp;Nicole Senft,&nbsp;Christine Whitmore,&nbsp;Stacie B Dusetzina","doi":"10.1177/10775587221108042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High medication prices can create a financial burden for patients and reduce medication initiation. To improve decision making, public policy is supporting development of tools to provide real-time prescription drug prices. We reviewed the literature on medication cost conversations to characterize the context in which these tools may be used. Our review included 42 articles: a median of 84% of patients across four clinical specialties reported a desire for cost conversations (<i>n</i> = 7 articles) but only 23% reported having held a cost conversation across six specialties (<i>n</i> = 16 articles). Non-White and older patients were less likely to report having held a cost conversation than White and younger patients in 9 of 13 and 5 of 9 articles, respectively, examining these associations. Our review indicates that tools providing price information may not result in improved decision making without complementary interventions that increase the frequency of cost conversations with a focus on protected groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587221108042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

High medication prices can create a financial burden for patients and reduce medication initiation. To improve decision making, public policy is supporting development of tools to provide real-time prescription drug prices. We reviewed the literature on medication cost conversations to characterize the context in which these tools may be used. Our review included 42 articles: a median of 84% of patients across four clinical specialties reported a desire for cost conversations (n = 7 articles) but only 23% reported having held a cost conversation across six specialties (n = 16 articles). Non-White and older patients were less likely to report having held a cost conversation than White and younger patients in 9 of 13 and 5 of 9 articles, respectively, examining these associations. Our review indicates that tools providing price information may not result in improved decision making without complementary interventions that increase the frequency of cost conversations with a focus on protected groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药费对话的需求与发生:一个叙事回顾。
高昂的药物价格会给患者造成经济负担,并减少用药。为了改进决策,公共政策正在支持开发提供实时处方药价格的工具。我们回顾了关于药物成本对话的文献,以描述这些工具可能使用的背景。我们的综述纳入了42篇文章:四个临床专科中有84%的患者报告希望进行成本对话(n = 7篇文章),但只有23%的患者报告在六个专科进行了成本对话(n = 16篇文章)。在13篇文章中的9篇和9篇文章中的5篇中,非白人和老年患者报告进行成本对话的可能性低于白人和年轻患者。我们的回顾表明,如果没有补充性的干预措施,即增加以受保护群体为重点的成本对话的频率,提供价格信息的工具可能无法改善决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Changes in Patient Care Experiences and the Nurse Work Environment: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Hospitals. Engaging Interdisciplinary Innovation Teams in Federally Qualified Health Centers. Strengthening Primary Care Workforce Capacity in Dementia Diagnosis and Care: A Qualitative Study of Project Alzheimer's Disease-ECHO. Varying Estimates of Social Workers in the United States: Which Data Source to Use? Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Choosing Care in VA Facilities Versus VA-Purchased Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1