Reduction in manual asymmetry and decline in fine manual dexterity in right-handed older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Laterality Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2022.2111437
Olena Vasylenko, Marta M Gorecka, Knut Waterloo, Claudia Rodríguez-Aranda
{"title":"Reduction in manual asymmetry and decline in fine manual dexterity in right-handed older adults with mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Olena Vasylenko,&nbsp;Marta M Gorecka,&nbsp;Knut Waterloo,&nbsp;Claudia Rodríguez-Aranda","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2022.2111437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research in Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease suggests that hand function is affected by neurodegenerative diseases. However, little is known about the relationship between hand function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, we conducted a kinematic analysis of unimanual hand movements in MCI patients to answer whether manual asymmetries and manual dexterity are affected or preserved in this condition. Forty-one MCI patients and fifty healthy controls were tested with the Purdue Pegboard test. All participants were right-handed. Kinematic analyses (by hand) were calculated for path length, angle, and linear and angular velocities during reaching, grasping, transport and inserting. Group differences were tested by with factorial MANOVAs and laterality indexes (LI) were assessed. Groups were compared on \"Right-Left\" hand correlations to identify kinematics that best single-out patients. Kinematics from grasping and inserting were significantly more deteriorated in the MCI group, while outcomes for reaching and transport denoted superior performance. LIs data showed symmetry of movements in the MCI group, during reaching and transport. Comparisons of \"Right-Left\" hand correlations revealed that kinematics in reaching and transport were more symmetrical in patients. This study showed a deterioration of fine manual dexterity, an enhancement in gross dexterity of upper-limbs, and symmetrical movements in MCI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":"27 6","pages":"581-604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2022.2111437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Research in Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease suggests that hand function is affected by neurodegenerative diseases. However, little is known about the relationship between hand function and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, we conducted a kinematic analysis of unimanual hand movements in MCI patients to answer whether manual asymmetries and manual dexterity are affected or preserved in this condition. Forty-one MCI patients and fifty healthy controls were tested with the Purdue Pegboard test. All participants were right-handed. Kinematic analyses (by hand) were calculated for path length, angle, and linear and angular velocities during reaching, grasping, transport and inserting. Group differences were tested by with factorial MANOVAs and laterality indexes (LI) were assessed. Groups were compared on "Right-Left" hand correlations to identify kinematics that best single-out patients. Kinematics from grasping and inserting were significantly more deteriorated in the MCI group, while outcomes for reaching and transport denoted superior performance. LIs data showed symmetry of movements in the MCI group, during reaching and transport. Comparisons of "Right-Left" hand correlations revealed that kinematics in reaching and transport were more symmetrical in patients. This study showed a deterioration of fine manual dexterity, an enhancement in gross dexterity of upper-limbs, and symmetrical movements in MCI patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度认知障碍的右撇子老年人手不对称的减少和精细手灵巧度的下降。
帕金森氏症或阿尔茨海默氏症的研究表明,手的功能受到神经退行性疾病的影响。然而,人们对手功能与轻度认知障碍(MCI)之间的关系知之甚少。因此,我们对MCI患者的单手运动进行了运动学分析,以回答在这种情况下,手的不对称性和手的灵巧性是否受到影响或保留。41名轻度认知障碍患者和50名健康对照者进行了普渡钉板试验。所有的参与者都是右撇子。运动学分析(手工)计算路径长度,角度,线速度和角速度在到达,抓取,运输和插入。用因子方差分析(factorial manova)检验组间差异,并评估偏侧性指数(LI)。各组进行“右-左”手相关性比较,以确定最佳单独患者的运动学。MCI组的抓取和插入运动能力明显恶化,而伸手和移动的结果显示出更好的表现。LIs数据显示MCI组在到达和运输过程中运动对称。比较“右-左”手的相关性显示,患者到达和运输的运动学更为对称。本研究显示轻度认知损伤患者的精细手灵巧性恶化,上肢大体灵巧性增强,运动对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
期刊最新文献
Dichotic listening with syllables: Effects of forced attention. Do bodybuilders pose symmetrically? Lateral bias analysis in mandatory poses of Mr. Olympia Classic Physique athletes. Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces Footedness in merlins: Raptors perching in a cold climate. Fear is more right lateralized than happiness and anger: Evidence for the motivational hypothesis of emotional face perception?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1