Episodic memory and recognition are influenced by cues' sensory modality: comparing odours, music and faces using virtual reality.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2023.2208793
Lucile Rey, Clément Désoche, Anne-Lise Saive, Marc Thévenet, Samuel Garcia, Barbara Tillmann, Jane Plailly
{"title":"Episodic memory and recognition are influenced by cues' sensory modality: comparing odours, music and faces using virtual reality.","authors":"Lucile Rey,&nbsp;Clément Désoche,&nbsp;Anne-Lise Saive,&nbsp;Marc Thévenet,&nbsp;Samuel Garcia,&nbsp;Barbara Tillmann,&nbsp;Jane Plailly","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2023.2208793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most everyday experiences are multisensory, and all senses can trigger the conscious re-experience of unique personal events embedded in their specific spatio-temporal context. Yet, little is known about how a cue's sensory modality influences episodic memory, and which step of this process is impacted. This study investigated recognition and episodic memory across olfactory, auditory and visual sensory modalities in a laboratory-ecological task using a non-immersive virtual reality device. At encoding, participants freely and actively explored unique and rich episodes in a three-room house where boxes delivered odours, musical pieces and pictures of face. At retrieval, participants were presented with modality-specific memory cues and were told to 1) recognise encoded cues among distractors and, 2) go to the room and select the box in which they encountered them at encoding. Memory performance and response times revealed that music and faces outperformed odours in recognition memory, but that odours and faces outperformed music in evoking encoding context. Interestingly, correct recognition of music and faces was accompanied by more profound inspirations than correct rejection. By directly comparing memory performance across sensory modalities, our study demonstrated that despite limited recognition, odours are powerful cues to evoke specific episodic memory retrieval.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":"31 9","pages":"1113-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2208793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most everyday experiences are multisensory, and all senses can trigger the conscious re-experience of unique personal events embedded in their specific spatio-temporal context. Yet, little is known about how a cue's sensory modality influences episodic memory, and which step of this process is impacted. This study investigated recognition and episodic memory across olfactory, auditory and visual sensory modalities in a laboratory-ecological task using a non-immersive virtual reality device. At encoding, participants freely and actively explored unique and rich episodes in a three-room house where boxes delivered odours, musical pieces and pictures of face. At retrieval, participants were presented with modality-specific memory cues and were told to 1) recognise encoded cues among distractors and, 2) go to the room and select the box in which they encountered them at encoding. Memory performance and response times revealed that music and faces outperformed odours in recognition memory, but that odours and faces outperformed music in evoking encoding context. Interestingly, correct recognition of music and faces was accompanied by more profound inspirations than correct rejection. By directly comparing memory performance across sensory modalities, our study demonstrated that despite limited recognition, odours are powerful cues to evoke specific episodic memory retrieval.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情节记忆和识别受到线索的感觉模式的影响:使用虚拟现实比较气味、音乐和人脸。
大多数日常体验都是多感官的,所有感官都可以触发对嵌入其特定时空背景中的独特个人事件的有意识的重新体验。然而,对于线索的感觉模式如何影响情节记忆,以及这个过程的哪一步受到影响,我们知之甚少。这项研究使用非沉浸式虚拟现实设备,在实验室生态任务中调查了嗅觉、听觉和视觉感官模式的识别和情景记忆。在编码时,参与者在一个有三个房间的房子里自由而积极地探索独特而丰富的情节,盒子里有气味、音乐片段和人脸照片。在检索时,参与者被呈现出特定于模态的记忆线索,并被告知1)识别干扰物中的编码线索,2)进入房间,选择他们在编码时遇到的框。记忆表现和反应时间表明,在识别记忆中,音乐和人脸的表现优于气味,但在唤起编码上下文方面,气味和人脸的效果优于音乐。有趣的是,对音乐和面孔的正确识别伴随着比正确拒绝更深刻的灵感。通过直接比较不同感觉模式的记忆表现,我们的研究表明,尽管识别能力有限,但气味是唤起特定情景记忆检索的强大线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the Closure and Resolution Scale (CRS). People experience similar intrusions about past and future autobiographical negative experiences. Comparison of working memory performance in athletes and non-athletes: a meta-analysis of behavioural studies. On the role of familiarity and developmental exposure in music-evoked autobiographical memories. Intrinsic functional connectivity in medial temporal lobe networks is associated with susceptibility to misinformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1