Awareness of electronic cigarettes in India: Findings from the 2016-2017 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS).

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/156446
Nidhi Jaswal, Garima Bhatt, Sonu Goel
{"title":"Awareness of electronic cigarettes in India: Findings from the 2016-2017 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS).","authors":"Nidhi Jaswal,&nbsp;Garima Bhatt,&nbsp;Sonu Goel","doi":"10.18332/tpc/156446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a public health threat globally. Despite the low proportion of e-cigarette users (1.22%) reported in the Global Adult Tobacco Survey-2, the Government of India enacted the Prohibition of E-cigarettes Act 2019 (PECA), prohibiting all forms of ENDS/ENNDS. The current analysis presents nationally representative findings on the level of awareness of e-cigarettes in India and its correlates and characteristics of those aware of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current secondary analysis from GATS-2 among adults aged ≥15 years from all states and Union Territories of India used a standard protocol for data collection and management. A multi-stage cluster sampling design was used. The respondents who were aware of e-cigarettes were included (n=2524). Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI, were calculated to measure the associations between independent and dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 3.4% of the respondents were aware (either heard or seen) of e-cigarettes and their awareness was found significantly higher among males (AOR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.90-2.24), urban population (AOR=2.83; 95% CI: 2.61-3.07), and higher education (AOR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.38-0.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public awareness campaigns about the harms of e-cigarettes and the law (PECA) need to be rolled out in urban and rural areas. Capacity-building exercises of implementers and enforcers at the grassroots level could also support communicating the harms to hard-to-reach groups. Further, regular compliance monitoring of the legislation and prosecution of violators would facilitate its effective implementation at the national and sub-national levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"9 ","pages":"03"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9875595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/156446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have recently emerged as a public health threat globally. Despite the low proportion of e-cigarette users (1.22%) reported in the Global Adult Tobacco Survey-2, the Government of India enacted the Prohibition of E-cigarettes Act 2019 (PECA), prohibiting all forms of ENDS/ENNDS. The current analysis presents nationally representative findings on the level of awareness of e-cigarettes in India and its correlates and characteristics of those aware of e-cigarettes.

Methods: The current secondary analysis from GATS-2 among adults aged ≥15 years from all states and Union Territories of India used a standard protocol for data collection and management. A multi-stage cluster sampling design was used. The respondents who were aware of e-cigarettes were included (n=2524). Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CI, were calculated to measure the associations between independent and dependent variables.

Results: Only 3.4% of the respondents were aware (either heard or seen) of e-cigarettes and their awareness was found significantly higher among males (AOR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.90-2.24), urban population (AOR=2.83; 95% CI: 2.61-3.07), and higher education (AOR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.38-0.45).

Conclusions: Public awareness campaigns about the harms of e-cigarettes and the law (PECA) need to be rolled out in urban and rural areas. Capacity-building exercises of implementers and enforcers at the grassroots level could also support communicating the harms to hard-to-reach groups. Further, regular compliance monitoring of the legislation and prosecution of violators would facilitate its effective implementation at the national and sub-national levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度人对电子烟的认识:2016-2017年全球成人烟草调查(GATS)的结果。
电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)最近已成为全球公共卫生威胁。尽管全球成人烟草调查-2中报告的电子烟用户比例很低(1.22%),但印度政府颁布了《2019年禁止电子烟法案》(PECA),禁止所有形式的电子烟。目前的分析提出了关于印度电子烟意识水平及其相关关系和电子烟意识特征的全国代表性调查结果。方法:目前对GATS-2中来自印度所有邦和联邦领土的年龄≥15岁的成年人进行二次分析,采用标准方案进行数据收集和管理。采用多阶段整群抽样设计。其中包括了解电子烟的受访者(n=2524)。进行二项logistic回归分析,并计算95% CI的校正优势比(AORs)来衡量自变量和因变量之间的相关性。结果:只有3.4%的受访者知道(听过或见过)电子烟,男性的意识明显更高(AOR=2.07;95% CI: 1.90-2.24),城市人口(AOR=2.83;95% CI: 2.61-3.07),高等教育(AOR=0.41;95% ci: 0.38-0.45)。结论:需要在城市和农村地区开展关于电子烟危害和法律(PECA)的公众意识运动。基层执行者和执行者的能力建设活动也有助于向难以接触到的群体宣传危害。此外,定期监测立法的遵守情况和起诉违法者将有助于在国家和国家以下各级有效执行立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of heated tobacco products in Cairo and Giza at points of sale: Availability, advertisement, and promotion. An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports. Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA. Stakeholder perspectives of tobacco use on campus and implementation of a tobacco-free policy at a Midwest university. Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1