Beyond the Covid-19 pandemic: remote learning and education inequalities.

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Empirica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7
Luca Bonacini, Marina Murat
{"title":"Beyond the Covid-19 pandemic: remote learning and education inequalities.","authors":"Luca Bonacini,&nbsp;Marina Murat","doi":"10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Is remote learning associated with education inequalities? We use PISA 2018 data from five European countries-France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom-to investigate whether education outcomes are related to the possession of the resources needed for distance learning. After controlling for a wide set of covariates, fixed effects, different specifications and testing the stability of coefficients, we find that remote learning is positively associated with average education outcomes, but also with strong and significant education inequalities. Our results show that negative gaps are larger where online schooling is more widespread, across countries, locations, and school types. More generally, remote learning inequalities appear to be associated with technological network externalities: they increase as digital education spreads. Policy makers must guarantee to all students and schools the possession of the resources needed for remote learning, but to reach this goal efficiently they must adapt their actions to the characteristics of countries, areas and school systems.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":46526,"journal":{"name":"Empirica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is remote learning associated with education inequalities? We use PISA 2018 data from five European countries-France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom-to investigate whether education outcomes are related to the possession of the resources needed for distance learning. After controlling for a wide set of covariates, fixed effects, different specifications and testing the stability of coefficients, we find that remote learning is positively associated with average education outcomes, but also with strong and significant education inequalities. Our results show that negative gaps are larger where online schooling is more widespread, across countries, locations, and school types. More generally, remote learning inequalities appear to be associated with technological network externalities: they increase as digital education spreads. Policy makers must guarantee to all students and schools the possession of the resources needed for remote learning, but to reach this goal efficiently they must adapt their actions to the characteristics of countries, areas and school systems.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在Covid-19大流行之外:远程学习和教育不平等。
远程学习与教育不平等有关吗?我们使用来自五个欧洲国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国)的2018年PISA数据来调查教育成果是否与远程学习所需资源的占有有关。在控制了大量协变量、固定效应、不同规范和系数稳定性检验后,我们发现远程学习与平均教育成果呈正相关,但也与强烈而显著的教育不平等呈正相关。我们的研究结果表明,在线教育在各个国家、地区和学校类型中越普遍,负差距就越大。更普遍地说,远程学习的不平等似乎与技术网络外部性有关:随着数字教育的普及,这种不平等也在增加。决策者必须保证所有学生和学校拥有远程学习所需的资源,但为了有效地实现这一目标,他们必须根据国家、地区和学校系统的特点调整行动。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s10663-022-09556-7获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Empirica
Empirica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Empirica is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes original research of general interest to an international audience. Authors are invited to submit empirical papers in all areas of economics with a particular focus on European economies. Per January 2021, the editors also solicit descriptive papers on current or unexplored topics. Founded in 1974, Empirica is the official journal of the Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft (Austrian Economic Association) and is published in cooperation with Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO). The journal aims at a wide international audience and invites submissions from economists around the world. Officially cited as: Empirica
期刊最新文献
Testing PPP hypothesis under considerations of nonlinear and asymmetric adjustments: new international evidence The varying impact of COVID-19 in the Spanish Labor Market What drives trust in the financial sector supervisor? New empirical evidence for the Netherlands Intergroup cooperation in the lab: asymmetric power relations and redistributive policies Labor market outcomes during opposite resource shocks: the 2009 and 2012 earthquakes in Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1