Quantifying the scientific revolution.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Evolutionary Human Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/ehs.2023.6
Benoît de Courson, Valentin Thouzeau, Nicolas Baumard
{"title":"Quantifying the scientific revolution.","authors":"Benoît de Courson,&nbsp;Valentin Thouzeau,&nbsp;Nicolas Baumard","doi":"10.1017/ehs.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Scientific Revolution represents a turning point in the history of humanity. Yet it remains ill-understood, partly because of a lack of quantification. Here, we leverage large datasets of individual biographies (<i>N</i> = 22,943) and present the first estimates of scientific production during the late medieval and early modern period (1300-1850). Our data reveal striking differences across countries, with England and the United Provinces being much more creative than other countries, suggesting that economic development has been key in generating the Scientific Revolution. In line with recent results in behavioural sciences, we show that scientific creativity and economic development are associated with other kinds of creative activities in philosophy, literature, music and the arts, as well as with inclusive institutions and ascetic religiosity, suggesting a common underlying mindset associated with long-term orientation and exploration. Finally, we investigate the interplay between economic development and cultural transmission (the so-called 'Republic of Letters') using partially observed Markov models imported from population biology. Surprisingly, the role of horizontal transmission (from one country to another) seems to have been marginal. Beyond the case of science, our results suggest that economic development is an important factor in the evolution of aspects of human culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":36414,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","volume":"5 ","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426016/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Scientific Revolution represents a turning point in the history of humanity. Yet it remains ill-understood, partly because of a lack of quantification. Here, we leverage large datasets of individual biographies (N = 22,943) and present the first estimates of scientific production during the late medieval and early modern period (1300-1850). Our data reveal striking differences across countries, with England and the United Provinces being much more creative than other countries, suggesting that economic development has been key in generating the Scientific Revolution. In line with recent results in behavioural sciences, we show that scientific creativity and economic development are associated with other kinds of creative activities in philosophy, literature, music and the arts, as well as with inclusive institutions and ascetic religiosity, suggesting a common underlying mindset associated with long-term orientation and exploration. Finally, we investigate the interplay between economic development and cultural transmission (the so-called 'Republic of Letters') using partially observed Markov models imported from population biology. Surprisingly, the role of horizontal transmission (from one country to another) seems to have been marginal. Beyond the case of science, our results suggest that economic development is an important factor in the evolution of aspects of human culture.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化科学革命。
科学革命是人类历史上的一个转折点。然而,人们对它仍然知之甚少,部分原因是缺乏量化。在这里,我们利用个人传记的大型数据集(N = 22,943),并提出了中世纪晚期和近代早期(1300-1850)科学生产的第一个估计。我们的数据揭示了不同国家之间的显著差异,英格兰和美国各省比其他国家更有创造力,这表明经济发展是产生科学革命的关键。与行为科学的最新研究结果一致,我们表明,科学创造力和经济发展与哲学、文学、音乐和艺术等其他类型的创造性活动以及包容性制度和禁欲主义宗教信仰有关,这表明与长期取向和探索有关的共同潜在心态。最后,我们使用从种群生物学引进的部分观测马尔可夫模型来研究经济发展与文化传播(所谓的“文学共和国”)之间的相互作用。令人惊讶的是,水平传播(从一个国家到另一个国家)的作用似乎微不足道。除了科学之外,我们的研究结果表明,经济发展是人类文化演变的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Evolutionary Human Sciences Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Coevolution of norm psychology and cooperation through exapted conformity. Salience of infectious diseases did not increase xenophobia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Testing the expensive-tissue hypothesis' prediction of inter-tissue competition using causal modelling with latent variables. Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects. The role of mating effort and co-residence history in step-grandparental investment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1