Randomized controlled trial of cognitive refocusing versus stimulus control treatment for college insomnia: feasibility of a brief, electronic-based, and peer-led approach.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of American College Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1080/07448481.2022.2109031
Patricia A Goodhines, Adrian M Svingos, Samantha Gerish, Aesoon Park, Les A Gellis
{"title":"Randomized controlled trial of cognitive refocusing versus stimulus control treatment for college insomnia: feasibility of a brief, electronic-based, and peer-led approach.","authors":"Patricia A Goodhines, Adrian M Svingos, Samantha Gerish, Aesoon Park, Les A Gellis","doi":"10.1080/07448481.2022.2109031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Performance of Cognitive Refocusing Treatment for Insomnia (CRT-I) relative to stimulus control treatment (SCT) remains unknown among college students. This pilot trial compared single-session, electronic-based, peer-led CRT-I to SCT, and as well as awareness-based (AC) and no-treatment (NTC) controls.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>College students (<i>N</i> = 82; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub>=18.59 [<i>SD</i> = 0.78]; 58% female; 61% White; 16% Hispanic) with insomnia symptoms were randomly assigned to CRT-I (<i>n</i> = 12), SCT (<i>n</i> = 14), and AC (<i>n</i> = 14) conditions, or non-randomly recruited to NTC (<i>n</i> = 42).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants completed baseline and one-month follow-up surveys, and reported daily task enactment (except NTC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Feasibility ratings were comparable across conditions. Within-group treatment effects revealed greater improvements in (a) insomnia symptom severity among CRT-I (<i>d</i> = 1.13) and SCT (<i>d</i> = 1.66) groups relative to AC (<i>d</i> = 0.90) and (b) pre-sleep cognitive arousal among CRT-I (<i>d</i> = 0.94) and SCT (<i>d</i> = 1.42) groups relative to AC (<i>d</i> = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brief, electronic-based, peer-led CRT-I and SCT interventions appear feasible and potentially efficacious for college insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American College Health","volume":" ","pages":"2229-2241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9908774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American College Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2109031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Performance of Cognitive Refocusing Treatment for Insomnia (CRT-I) relative to stimulus control treatment (SCT) remains unknown among college students. This pilot trial compared single-session, electronic-based, peer-led CRT-I to SCT, and as well as awareness-based (AC) and no-treatment (NTC) controls.

Participants: College students (N = 82; Mage=18.59 [SD = 0.78]; 58% female; 61% White; 16% Hispanic) with insomnia symptoms were randomly assigned to CRT-I (n = 12), SCT (n = 14), and AC (n = 14) conditions, or non-randomly recruited to NTC (n = 42).

Methods: All participants completed baseline and one-month follow-up surveys, and reported daily task enactment (except NTC).

Results: Feasibility ratings were comparable across conditions. Within-group treatment effects revealed greater improvements in (a) insomnia symptom severity among CRT-I (d = 1.13) and SCT (d = 1.66) groups relative to AC (d = 0.90) and (b) pre-sleep cognitive arousal among CRT-I (d = 0.94) and SCT (d = 1.42) groups relative to AC (d = 0.75).

Conclusions: Brief, electronic-based, peer-led CRT-I and SCT interventions appear feasible and potentially efficacious for college insomnia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对大学生失眠症的认知重新聚焦与刺激控制治疗随机对照试验:简短、电子化和同伴引导方法的可行性。
目的:在大学生中,相对于刺激控制治疗(SCT),失眠认知再聚焦治疗(CRT-I)的效果尚不清楚。这项试点试验比较了单次、电子、同伴引导的CRT-I与SCT,以及基于意识(AC)和无治疗(NTC)的对照组:有失眠症状的大学生(人数=82;年龄=18.59 [SD = 0.78];58%为女性;61%为白人;16%为西班牙裔)被随机分配到CRT-I(人数=12)、SCT(人数=14)和AC(人数=14)条件下,或非随机招募到NTC(人数=42)条件下:所有参与者都完成了基线和一个月的随访调查,并报告了每日任务执行情况(NTC 除外):结果:不同条件下的可行性评分相当。组内治疗效果显示:(a) CRT-I 组(d = 1.13)和 SCT 组(d = 1.66)的失眠症状严重程度相对于 AC 组(d = 0.90)有较大改善;(b) CRT-I 组(d = 0.94)和 SCT 组(d = 1.42)的睡前认知唤醒相对于 AC 组(d = 0.75)有较大改善:简短、电子化、同伴引导的 CRT-I 和 SCT 干预似乎对大学生失眠症是可行的,并具有潜在疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
388
期刊介绍: Binge drinking, campus violence, eating disorders, sexual harassment: Today"s college students face challenges their parents never imagined. The Journal of American College Health, the only scholarly publication devoted entirely to college students" health, focuses on these issues, as well as use of tobacco and other drugs, sexual habits, psychological problems, and guns on campus, as well as the students... Published in cooperation with the American College Health Association, the Journal of American College Health is a must read for physicians, nurses, health educators, and administrators who are involved with students every day.
期刊最新文献
A cross-sectional comparison of the association between self-reported sources of stress and psychological distress among Canadian undergraduate and graduate students. Examining resources to promote sexual health and address sexual violence at community colleges across the United States: a qualitative study. Polyvictimization and academic performance among college students: Examining differences across sexual and gender identity. The lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the basic-needs security and mental health on a sample of college students. Awareness, knowledge, and willingness to take PrEP among Black students attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1