Distinction of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from small cell lung carcinoma: a morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Modern Pathology Pub Date : 2006-07-07 DOI:10.1038/modpathol.3800659
Kenzo Hiroshima, Akira Iyoda, Takashi Shida, Kiyoshi Shibuya, Toshihiko Iizasa, Hirohisa Kishi, Tohru Tanizawa, Takehiko Fujisawa, Yukio Nakatani
{"title":"Distinction of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from small cell lung carcinoma: a morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis","authors":"Kenzo Hiroshima, Akira Iyoda, Takashi Shida, Kiyoshi Shibuya, Toshihiko Iizasa, Hirohisa Kishi, Tohru Tanizawa, Takehiko Fujisawa, Yukio Nakatani","doi":"10.1038/modpathol.3800659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distinction between pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma is difficult in some cases. Some propose that these carcinomas should be classified as one high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. We examined biological features of small cell carcinoma (n=23), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=17), and classic large cell carcinoma (n=12). The average ratio of nuclear diameter of the tumor cells to that of lymphocytes for small cell carcinoma was smaller than that for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P<0.0001). The frequencies of the expressions of CD56, mASH1, TTF-1, and p16 were higher and that of NeuroD was lower in small cell carcinoma than in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The frequency of loss of heterozygosity at 3p was higher in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas than in classic large cell carcinoma (P=0.0002). Allelic losses at D5S422 (5q33) were more frequent in small cell carcinoma than in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P=0.0091). Mean fractional regional loss indices of the tumors were 0.38, 0.65, and 0.72 for patients with classic large cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, respectively (P=0.0003). Five-year overall survivals of patients with classic large cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma in stage I were 67, 73, 60%, respectively. Patients with NeuroD expression had better survivals, and those with p63 expression had poorer survivals in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Patients with TTF-1 expression had poorer survivals in small cell carcinoma. Our data suggest that large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are different morphologically, phenotypically, and genetically, although there are some overlapping features. Although further studies are needed to analyze the biological behavior of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas including sensitivity to chemotherapy, the pathological distinction of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from small cell carcinoma may be necessary to treat the patients with neuroendocrine tumors.","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":"19 10","pages":"1358-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/modpathol.3800659","citationCount":"148","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/3800659","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 148

Abstract

The distinction between pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma is difficult in some cases. Some propose that these carcinomas should be classified as one high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. We examined biological features of small cell carcinoma (n=23), large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=17), and classic large cell carcinoma (n=12). The average ratio of nuclear diameter of the tumor cells to that of lymphocytes for small cell carcinoma was smaller than that for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P<0.0001). The frequencies of the expressions of CD56, mASH1, TTF-1, and p16 were higher and that of NeuroD was lower in small cell carcinoma than in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. The frequency of loss of heterozygosity at 3p was higher in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas than in classic large cell carcinoma (P=0.0002). Allelic losses at D5S422 (5q33) were more frequent in small cell carcinoma than in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P=0.0091). Mean fractional regional loss indices of the tumors were 0.38, 0.65, and 0.72 for patients with classic large cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, respectively (P=0.0003). Five-year overall survivals of patients with classic large cell carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma in stage I were 67, 73, 60%, respectively. Patients with NeuroD expression had better survivals, and those with p63 expression had poorer survivals in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Patients with TTF-1 expression had poorer survivals in small cell carcinoma. Our data suggest that large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma are different morphologically, phenotypically, and genetically, although there are some overlapping features. Although further studies are needed to analyze the biological behavior of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas including sensitivity to chemotherapy, the pathological distinction of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from small cell carcinoma may be necessary to treat the patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺大细胞神经内分泌癌与小细胞肺癌的区别:形态学、免疫组织化学和分子分析
在某些病例中,很难区分肺大细胞神经内分泌癌和小细胞癌。有人建议将这些癌归类为一种高级别神经内分泌癌。我们研究了23例小细胞癌、17例大细胞神经内分泌癌和12例典型大细胞癌的生物学特征。小细胞癌的肿瘤细胞核直径与淋巴细胞核直径的平均比值小于大细胞神经内分泌癌(P<0.0001)。CD56、mASH1、TTF-1和p16在小细胞癌中的表达频率高于大细胞神经内分泌癌,而NeuroD的表达频率低于大细胞神经内分泌癌。高级别神经内分泌癌中3p杂合性缺失的频率高于典型的大细胞癌(P=0.0002)。D5S422 (5q33)等位基因缺失在小细胞癌中比在大细胞神经内分泌癌中更常见(P=0.0091)。典型大细胞癌、大细胞神经内分泌癌和小细胞癌的平均局部损失指数分别为0.38、0.65和0.72 (P=0.0003)。典型大细胞癌、大细胞神经内分泌癌和I期小细胞癌患者的5年总生存率分别为67%、73%和60%。在大细胞神经内分泌癌中,表达NeuroD的患者生存率较高,而表达p63的患者生存率较低。TTF-1表达的患者在小细胞癌中生存率较低。我们的数据表明,大细胞神经内分泌癌和小细胞癌在形态、表型和遗传上不同,尽管存在一些重叠的特征。虽然高级别神经内分泌癌的生物学行为包括对化疗的敏感性还需要进一步的研究,但大细胞神经内分泌癌与小细胞神经内分泌癌的病理区分可能是治疗神经内分泌肿瘤患者的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
期刊最新文献
Complex Genetics in Somatic Mosaic Disorders: Evaluating the Rate of Multiple "Hits" in Non-Malignant Lesions. Genetic profiling of mammary periductal stromal tumors with histologic correlation highlights high-grade and low-grade groups and similarities to phyllodes tumors. Corrigendum to “Aleukemic Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Without Neutrophilia and Thrombocytosis: A Report From the BCR::ABL1 Pathology Group” [Modern Pathology. 2024;37(2):100406] Biomarkers Informed by Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics - Biomarkers for Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma. Utility of p53, p16, and MTAP Immunohistochemistry in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia With Concurrent Candidiasis: A Novel Pattern-based Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1