Comparative Bioavailability and Benefits on Mental Functions of Novel Extended-Release Caffeine Capsules against Immediate-Release Caffeine Capsules: An Open-Label, Randomized, Cross-over, Single-Dose Two-Way Crossover Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Dietary Supplements Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-05 DOI:10.1080/19390211.2022.2160529
Shefali Thanawala, Rajat Shah, R Abiraamasundari, R Senthurselvi, Prabakaran Desomayanandam
{"title":"Comparative Bioavailability and Benefits on Mental Functions of Novel Extended-Release Caffeine Capsules against Immediate-Release Caffeine Capsules: An Open-Label, Randomized, Cross-over, Single-Dose Two-Way Crossover Study.","authors":"Shefali Thanawala, Rajat Shah, R Abiraamasundari, R Senthurselvi, Prabakaran Desomayanandam","doi":"10.1080/19390211.2022.2160529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Present study aimed compared pharmacokinetic profile of sustained-release CaffXtend® capsules (SR-Caffeine) with immediate-release caffeine capsules (IR-Caffeine), and the effect of SR-caffeine on memory, motivation, concentration, and attention. This open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period, two-way crossover oral bioavailability study block randomized (1:1) healthy subjects (<i>N</i> = 15) to receive SR-Caffeine (200 mg) and IR-Caffeine (200 mg). Blood samples were collected at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h in each period. Primary study outcome included comparing relative bioavailability of SR-Caffeine 200 mg and IR-Caffeine 200 mg under fasting conditions, and changes in caffeine research visual analogue scale (Caff-VAS) scores ('relaxed', 'alert', 'jittery', 'tired', 'tense', 'headache', 'overall mood' and 'mentally fatigued') were also evaluated. Fifteen subjects completed the study. Mean t<sub>max</sub> was 4.08 ± 2.13h for SR-Caffeine compared to 0.83 ± 0.39h for IR-Caffeine, (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Similarly, mean t<sub>½</sub> was 7.07 ± 3.48h for SR-Caffeine compared to 5.78 ± 2.11h for IR-Caffeine (<i>p</i> = 0.04189). However, total exposure was similar for SR-Caffeine and IR-Caffeine (90% CI: 89.89-120.50% to 94.49-123.82% for geometric least square mean of ln-transformed AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>). In the Caff-VAS evaluation, the SR-Caffeine group showed significantly better scores for 'jitteriness', 'tiredness', 'alertness' and 'overall mood' for 8-12 h than the IR-Caffeine group. No adverse events were reported. Results demonstrated sustained release of caffeine over 24 h from SR-Caffeine as compared to IR-Caffeine, which showed significant improvements in the scores for 'relaxed', 'alertness' and 'overall mood' and significantly lower scores for the parameters-'jittery' and 'tired' for extended period.<b>Clinical trial registration:</b> CTRI/2021/06/034185.</p>","PeriodicalId":15646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2022.2160529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present study aimed compared pharmacokinetic profile of sustained-release CaffXtend® capsules (SR-Caffeine) with immediate-release caffeine capsules (IR-Caffeine), and the effect of SR-caffeine on memory, motivation, concentration, and attention. This open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period, two-way crossover oral bioavailability study block randomized (1:1) healthy subjects (N = 15) to receive SR-Caffeine (200 mg) and IR-Caffeine (200 mg). Blood samples were collected at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h in each period. Primary study outcome included comparing relative bioavailability of SR-Caffeine 200 mg and IR-Caffeine 200 mg under fasting conditions, and changes in caffeine research visual analogue scale (Caff-VAS) scores ('relaxed', 'alert', 'jittery', 'tired', 'tense', 'headache', 'overall mood' and 'mentally fatigued') were also evaluated. Fifteen subjects completed the study. Mean tmax was 4.08 ± 2.13h for SR-Caffeine compared to 0.83 ± 0.39h for IR-Caffeine, (p < 0.0001). Similarly, mean t½ was 7.07 ± 3.48h for SR-Caffeine compared to 5.78 ± 2.11h for IR-Caffeine (p = 0.04189). However, total exposure was similar for SR-Caffeine and IR-Caffeine (90% CI: 89.89-120.50% to 94.49-123.82% for geometric least square mean of ln-transformed AUC0-t and AUC0-∞). In the Caff-VAS evaluation, the SR-Caffeine group showed significantly better scores for 'jitteriness', 'tiredness', 'alertness' and 'overall mood' for 8-12 h than the IR-Caffeine group. No adverse events were reported. Results demonstrated sustained release of caffeine over 24 h from SR-Caffeine as compared to IR-Caffeine, which showed significant improvements in the scores for 'relaxed', 'alertness' and 'overall mood' and significantly lower scores for the parameters-'jittery' and 'tired' for extended period.Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2021/06/034185.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型缓释咖啡因胶囊与速释咖啡因胶囊的生物利用度比较及对精神功能的益处:一项开放标签、随机、交叉、单剂量双向交叉研究。
本研究旨在比较缓释型CaffXtend®胶囊(SR-Caffeine)和速释型咖啡因胶囊(IR-Caffeine)的药代动力学特征,以及sr -咖啡因对记忆、动机、注意力和注意力的影响。这项开放标签、随机、单剂量、两治疗、两顺序、两期、双向交叉口服生物利用度研究随机(1:1)健康受试者(N = 15)接受sr -咖啡因(200 mg)和ir -咖啡因(200 mg)。于每个周期0.25、0.50、0.75、1、1.5、2、3、4、5、6、8、10、12、24、36、48 h采集血样。主要研究结果包括在禁食条件下比较sr -咖啡因200毫克和ir -咖啡因200毫克的相对生物利用度,并评估咖啡因研究视觉模拟量表(caffa - vas)评分的变化(“放松”、“警觉”、“紧张”、“疲倦”、“紧张”、“头痛”、“整体情绪”和“精神疲劳”)。15名受试者完成了这项研究。sr -咖啡因组的平均tmax为4.08±2.13h, ir -咖啡因组为0.83±0.39h (p½为7.07±3.48h, sr -咖啡因组为5.78±2.11h, p = 0.04189)。然而,sr -咖啡因和ir -咖啡因的总暴露量相似(ln变换的AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的几何最小二乘平均值的90% CI: 89.89-120.50%至94.49-123.82%)。在咖啡因- vas评估中,sr -咖啡因组在8-12小时的“紧张”、“疲劳”、“警觉性”和“整体情绪”方面的得分明显高于ir -咖啡因组。无不良事件报告。结果显示,与ir -咖啡因相比,sr -咖啡因在24小时内持续释放咖啡因,在“放松”、“警觉性”和“整体情绪”方面的得分显著提高,而在“紧张”和“疲劳”等参数上的得分明显降低。临床试验注册:CTRI/2021/06/034185。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dietary Supplements
Journal of Dietary Supplements Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dietary Supplements (formerly the Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional & Medical Foods) has been retitled to reflect the bold departure from a traditional scientific journal presentation to a leading voice for anyone with a stake in dietary supplements. The journal addresses important issues that meet the broad range of interests from researchers, regulators, marketers, educators, and health professionals from academic, governmental, industry, healthcare, public health, and consumer education sectors. This vital tool not only presents scientific information but interprets it - helping you more readily pass it on to your students, patients, clients, or company.
期刊最新文献
Caffeic Acid: Numerous Chemoprotective Effects are Mediated via Hormesis. Biochemical and Histopathological Evidence on Beneficial Effects of Standardized Extract from Tragopogon graminifolius as a Dietary Supplement in Fatty Liver: Role of Oxidative Stress. Efficacy of Dichrostachys Glomerata Supplementation on Overweight and Mildly Obese Adult's Weight, Mood, and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Effects of an Isotonic Beetroot Drink on Power Output During Sprint Exercise and Jump Performance in Physically Active Individuals: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Dietary Collagen Peptides Ameliorate the Mood Status of Fatigue and Vigor: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Comparative Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1