Genital Mutilation in Males.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Urology Reports Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s11934-022-01129-2
Carlos Toribio-Vázquez, Álvaro Yebes, José Quesada-Olarte, Andrea Rodriguez, María Alonso-Bartolomé, Héctor Ayllon, Luis Martinez-Piñeiro
{"title":"Genital Mutilation in Males.","authors":"Carlos Toribio-Vázquez,&nbsp;Álvaro Yebes,&nbsp;José Quesada-Olarte,&nbsp;Andrea Rodriguez,&nbsp;María Alonso-Bartolomé,&nbsp;Héctor Ayllon,&nbsp;Luis Martinez-Piñeiro","doi":"10.1007/s11934-022-01129-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Genital mutilation in males can range from minor injuries (cuts from a blade) to severe urological emergencies (testicular or penile amputation). Due to the rarity of these events, there is a lack of extensive reports, as most of the available literature is regarding single cases. Genital mutilation has been associated with psychotic and non-psychotic causes, psychiatric conditions, drug consumption, sexual practices, or even cultural or religious beliefs. It is crucial to perform a psychiatric evaluation of these patients to obtain the best therapeutic approach. This manuscript serves as a review of the currently available knowledge regarding male genital mutilation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A great variety of reasons have been associated with genital mutilation. Previous authors have distinguished between those that present with a clear mental health precursor from cases with no psychotic background. Nevertheless, sometimes, it is difficult to make this distinction. Recently, reconstructive techniques for amputation cases have moved towards a microsurgical approach in order to improve outcomes. A holistic therapeutic approach must be performed to increase the chances of effective treatment. Close collaboration between urologists, psychiatrists, and emergency doctors is essential to ensure the best care for patients performing genital mutilation. Future publications must evaluate differences in treatment options and the impact that these have on the long-term well-being of patients undergoing genital self-mutilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01129-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: Genital mutilation in males can range from minor injuries (cuts from a blade) to severe urological emergencies (testicular or penile amputation). Due to the rarity of these events, there is a lack of extensive reports, as most of the available literature is regarding single cases. Genital mutilation has been associated with psychotic and non-psychotic causes, psychiatric conditions, drug consumption, sexual practices, or even cultural or religious beliefs. It is crucial to perform a psychiatric evaluation of these patients to obtain the best therapeutic approach. This manuscript serves as a review of the currently available knowledge regarding male genital mutilation.

Recent findings: A great variety of reasons have been associated with genital mutilation. Previous authors have distinguished between those that present with a clear mental health precursor from cases with no psychotic background. Nevertheless, sometimes, it is difficult to make this distinction. Recently, reconstructive techniques for amputation cases have moved towards a microsurgical approach in order to improve outcomes. A holistic therapeutic approach must be performed to increase the chances of effective treatment. Close collaboration between urologists, psychiatrists, and emergency doctors is essential to ensure the best care for patients performing genital mutilation. Future publications must evaluate differences in treatment options and the impact that these have on the long-term well-being of patients undergoing genital self-mutilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男性生殖器切割。
综述的目的:男性生殖器切割的范围从轻微的伤害(被刀片割伤)到严重的泌尿外科急诊(睾丸或阴茎截肢)。由于这些事件的罕见性,缺乏广泛的报道,因为大多数可用的文献都是关于单个病例的。生殖器切割与精神病和非精神病原因、精神状况、药物消费、性行为甚至文化或宗教信仰有关。对这些患者进行精神病学评估以获得最佳治疗方法是至关重要的。这份手稿是对目前关于男性生殖器切割的现有知识的回顾。最近的发现:各种各样的原因都与生殖器切割有关。以前的作者已经区分了那些有明显精神健康前兆的病例和没有精神病背景的病例。然而,有时很难做出这种区分。最近,截肢病例的重建技术已经转向显微外科方法,以改善结果。必须采用整体治疗方法,以增加有效治疗的机会。泌尿科医生、精神科医生和急诊医生之间的密切合作对于确保对实施生殖器切割的患者提供最佳护理至关重要。未来的出版物必须评估治疗选择的差异及其对生殖器自残患者长期福祉的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology Reports
Current Urology Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Professional Burnout and Career Choice Regret in Urology Residents. Third-Line Therapeutic Interventions for Non-Neurogenic Bladder Dysfunction in Children. Results of Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy. Voiding Dysfunction in Transgender Patients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. Focal Therapy in Grade Group 3 Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1