Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits.

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES One Earth Pub Date : 2022-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.006
Claudia Sattler, Jens Rommel, Cheng Chen, Marina García-Llorente, Inés Gutiérrez-Briceño, Katrin Prager, Maria F Reyes, Barbara Schröter, Christoph Schulze, Lenny G J van Bussel, Lasse Loft, Bettina Matzdorf, Eszter Kelemen
{"title":"Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits.","authors":"Claudia Sattler,&nbsp;Jens Rommel,&nbsp;Cheng Chen,&nbsp;Marina García-Llorente,&nbsp;Inés Gutiérrez-Briceño,&nbsp;Katrin Prager,&nbsp;Maria F Reyes,&nbsp;Barbara Schröter,&nbsp;Christoph Schulze,&nbsp;Lenny G J van Bussel,&nbsp;Lasse Loft,&nbsp;Bettina Matzdorf,&nbsp;Eszter Kelemen","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solving grand environmental societal challenges calls for transdisciplinary and participatory methods in social-ecological research. These methods enable co-designing the research, co-producing the results, and co-creating the impacts together with concerned stakeholders. COVID-19 has had serious impacts on the choice of research methods, but reflections on recent experiences of \"moving online\" are still rare. In this perspective, we focus on the challenge of adjusting different participatory methods to online formats used in five transdisciplinary social-ecological research projects. The key added value of our research is the lessons learned from a comparison of the pros and cons of adjusting a broader set of methods to online formats. We conclude that combining the adjusted online approaches with well-established face-to-face formats into more inclusive hybrid approaches can enrich and diversify the pool of available methods for postpandemic research. Furthermore, a more diverse group of participants can be engaged in the research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"5 1","pages":"62-73"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8779601/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Solving grand environmental societal challenges calls for transdisciplinary and participatory methods in social-ecological research. These methods enable co-designing the research, co-producing the results, and co-creating the impacts together with concerned stakeholders. COVID-19 has had serious impacts on the choice of research methods, but reflections on recent experiences of "moving online" are still rare. In this perspective, we focus on the challenge of adjusting different participatory methods to online formats used in five transdisciplinary social-ecological research projects. The key added value of our research is the lessons learned from a comparison of the pros and cons of adjusting a broader set of methods to online formats. We conclude that combining the adjusted online approaches with well-established face-to-face formats into more inclusive hybrid approaches can enrich and diversify the pool of available methods for postpandemic research. Furthermore, a more diverse group of participants can be engaged in the research process.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19及其后的参与式研究:调整你的方法工具包。
解决重大的环境社会挑战需要跨学科和参与式的社会生态学研究方法。这些方法可以与相关利益相关者共同设计研究,共同产生结果,共同创造影响。新冠肺炎疫情对研究方法的选择产生了严重影响,但对近期“移动网络”经验的反思仍然很少。从这个角度来看,我们关注的是在五个跨学科社会生态研究项目中调整不同的参与式方法以适应在线格式所面临的挑战。我们的研究的关键附加值在于,我们比较了将更广泛的方法调整为在线格式的利弊,从中获得了经验教训。我们的结论是,将调整后的在线方法与完善的面对面形式结合起来,形成更具包容性的混合方法,可以丰富和多样化大流行后研究的可用方法库。此外,更多样化的参与者群体可以参与研究过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
期刊最新文献
China's carbon-neutral policies will reduce short-term PM2.5-associated excess incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Generating affordable protection of high seas biodiversity through cross-sectoral spatial planning New framework reveals gaps in US ocean biodiversity protection FinTech for environmental sustainability: Promises and pitfalls Policy documents considering biodiversity, land use, and climate in the European Arctic reveal visible, hidden, and imagined nexus approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1