A computed tomographic evaluation of femoral and tibial rotational reference axes in total knee arthroplasty.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS SICOT-J Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2023002
Johncy Panicker, Jai Thilak
{"title":"A computed tomographic evaluation of femoral and tibial rotational reference axes in total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Johncy Panicker,&nbsp;Jai Thilak","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2023002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> The surgical trans epicondylar axis (sTEA) is considered the gold standard for optimum rotation of the femoral component; however, no consensus exists on tibial component positioning. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship of sTEA to various femoral and tibial reference axes in varus osteoarthritis (OA) knees and (ii) to study the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the axis relationships.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> The study was done on preoperative computerised tomogram (CT) scans of 110 varus knees to assess the rotational relationships respectively of femoral side sTEA with whitesides line (WSL), posterior condylar axis (PCA), clinical trans epicondylar axis (cTEA) and on the tibial side sTEA with posterior tibial margin (PTM), anterior condylar axis (ACA), Akagi's line and line from the geometric centre of the tibial plateau to 1/3rd tibial tubercle (line GC 1/3rd TT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> On the femoral side the mean angles of sTEA with WSL, PCA, cTEA were 95.64° ± 2.85°, 1.77° ± 1.88°, 4.19° ± 0.99° respectively. On the tibial side, the mean angles of sTEA with, PTM, ACA, Akagi's line, and line GC 1/3rd TT were 1.10° ± 4.69°, 11.98° ± 4.51°, 2.43° ± 4.35°, 16.04° ± 5.93° respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Contrary to the generalization, TEA has variable relationships. The surgical trans epicondylar axis was not at the assumed 3° of external rotation to PCA in 85% of knees, nor perpendicular to WSL in >95% of knees. Of the four tibial axes, Akagi's line was the least variable with sTEA. Furthermore, surgeons should also be aware of the multiple reference axes and the range of deviation from sTEA to optimize the rotational alignment of components.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"9 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9878997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  The surgical trans epicondylar axis (sTEA) is considered the gold standard for optimum rotation of the femoral component; however, no consensus exists on tibial component positioning. The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship of sTEA to various femoral and tibial reference axes in varus osteoarthritis (OA) knees and (ii) to study the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of the axis relationships.

Materials and methods:  The study was done on preoperative computerised tomogram (CT) scans of 110 varus knees to assess the rotational relationships respectively of femoral side sTEA with whitesides line (WSL), posterior condylar axis (PCA), clinical trans epicondylar axis (cTEA) and on the tibial side sTEA with posterior tibial margin (PTM), anterior condylar axis (ACA), Akagi's line and line from the geometric centre of the tibial plateau to 1/3rd tibial tubercle (line GC 1/3rd TT).

Results:  On the femoral side the mean angles of sTEA with WSL, PCA, cTEA were 95.64° ± 2.85°, 1.77° ± 1.88°, 4.19° ± 0.99° respectively. On the tibial side, the mean angles of sTEA with, PTM, ACA, Akagi's line, and line GC 1/3rd TT were 1.10° ± 4.69°, 11.98° ± 4.51°, 2.43° ± 4.35°, 16.04° ± 5.93° respectively.

Conclusion:  Contrary to the generalization, TEA has variable relationships. The surgical trans epicondylar axis was not at the assumed 3° of external rotation to PCA in 85% of knees, nor perpendicular to WSL in >95% of knees. Of the four tibial axes, Akagi's line was the least variable with sTEA. Furthermore, surgeons should also be aware of the multiple reference axes and the range of deviation from sTEA to optimize the rotational alignment of components.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术中股骨和胫骨旋转参考轴的计算机断层扫描评价。
手术经上髁轴(sTEA)被认为是最佳旋转股骨假体的金标准;然而,对于胫骨构件的定位尚无共识。本研究的目的是确定膝内翻性骨关节炎(OA)患者sTEA与各种股骨和胫骨参考轴的关系,以及(ii)研究观察者内部和观察者之间轴线关系的变异性。材料和方法:本研究对110例膝内翻患者进行术前计算机断层扫描(CT),分别评估股骨侧sTEA与白边线(WSL)、后髁轴(PCA)、临床经上髁轴(cTEA)的旋转关系,以及胫骨侧sTEA与胫骨后缘(PTM)、前髁轴(ACA)、Akagi线和胫骨平台几何中心至胫骨结节1/3线(GC 1/3线TT)的旋转关系。结果:股骨侧与WSL、PCA、cTEA的平均夹角分别为95.64°±2.85°、1.77°±1.88°、4.19°±0.99°。胫骨侧sTEA与PTM、ACA、赤城线、GC 1/3线的平均夹角分别为1.10°±4.69°、11.98°±4.51°、2.43°±4.35°、16.04°±5.93°。结论:与一般结论相反,TEA存在变量关系。手术经上髁轴不在假定的3°外旋至PCA的85%的膝关节,也不垂直于WSL的95%以上的膝关节。在四条胫骨轴中,赤城线在sTEA中变化最小。此外,外科医生还应该了解多个参考轴和偏离sTEA的范围,以优化部件的旋转对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups following failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures at a mean follow-up of 6 years. Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. Delayed presentation of lower cervical facet dislocations: What to learn from past reports?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1