Modeling the Potential Impact of Changing Access Rates to Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Dependence for Local Authorities in England: The Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Model (STreAM).

Alan Brennan, Daniel Hill-McManus, Tony Stone, Penny Buykx, Abdallah Ally, Robert E Pryce, Robert Alston, Andrew Jones, Donal Cairns, Tim Millar, Michael Donmall, Tom Phillips, Petra Meier, Colin Drummond
{"title":"Modeling the Potential Impact of Changing Access Rates to Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Dependence for Local Authorities in England: The Specialist Treatment for Alcohol Model (STreAM).","authors":"Alan Brennan, Daniel Hill-McManus, Tony Stone, Penny Buykx, Abdallah Ally, Robert E Pryce, Robert Alston, Andrew Jones, Donal Cairns, Tim Millar, Michael Donmall, Tom Phillips, Petra Meier, Colin Drummond","doi":"10.15288/jsads.2019.s18.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We modeled the impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates to different treatment pathways on the future prevalence of alcohol dependence, treatment outcomes, service capacity, costs, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Local Authority numbers and the prevalence of people \"potentially in need of assessment for and treatment in specialist services for alcohol dependence\" (PINASTFAD) are estimated by mild, moderate, severe, and complex needs. Administrative data were used to estimate the Specialist Treatment Access Rate per PINASTFAD person and classify 22 different treatment pathways. Other model inputs include natural remission, relapse after treatment, service costs, and mortality rates. \"What-if\" analyses assess changes to Specialist Treatment Access Rates and treatment pathways. Model outputs include the numbers and prevalence of people who are PINASTFAD, numbers treated by 22 pathways, outcomes (successful completion with abstinence, successfully moderated nonproblematic drinking, re-treatment within 6 months, dropout, transfer, custody), mortality rates, capacity requirements (numbers in contact with community services or staying in residential or inpatient places), total treatment costs, and general health care savings. Five scenarios illustrate functionality: (a) no change, (b) achieve access rates at the 70th percentile nationally, (c) increase access by 25%, (d) increase access to Scotland rate, and (e) reduce access by 25%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 14,581 people are PINASTFAD (2.43% of adults) and the Specialist Treatment Access Rate is 10.84%. The 5-year impact of scenarios on PINASTFAD numbers (vs. no change) are (B) reduced by 191 (-1.3%), (C) reduced by 477 (-3.3%), (D) reduced by almost 2,800 (-19.2%), and (E) increased by 533 (+3.6%). The relative impact is similar for other outputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decision makers can estimate the potential impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates for alcohol dependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","volume":"Sup 18 ","pages":"96-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6377021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2019.s18.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We modeled the impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates to different treatment pathways on the future prevalence of alcohol dependence, treatment outcomes, service capacity, costs, and mortality.

Method: Local Authority numbers and the prevalence of people "potentially in need of assessment for and treatment in specialist services for alcohol dependence" (PINASTFAD) are estimated by mild, moderate, severe, and complex needs. Administrative data were used to estimate the Specialist Treatment Access Rate per PINASTFAD person and classify 22 different treatment pathways. Other model inputs include natural remission, relapse after treatment, service costs, and mortality rates. "What-if" analyses assess changes to Specialist Treatment Access Rates and treatment pathways. Model outputs include the numbers and prevalence of people who are PINASTFAD, numbers treated by 22 pathways, outcomes (successful completion with abstinence, successfully moderated nonproblematic drinking, re-treatment within 6 months, dropout, transfer, custody), mortality rates, capacity requirements (numbers in contact with community services or staying in residential or inpatient places), total treatment costs, and general health care savings. Five scenarios illustrate functionality: (a) no change, (b) achieve access rates at the 70th percentile nationally, (c) increase access by 25%, (d) increase access to Scotland rate, and (e) reduce access by 25%.

Results: At baseline, 14,581 people are PINASTFAD (2.43% of adults) and the Specialist Treatment Access Rate is 10.84%. The 5-year impact of scenarios on PINASTFAD numbers (vs. no change) are (B) reduced by 191 (-1.3%), (C) reduced by 477 (-3.3%), (D) reduced by almost 2,800 (-19.2%), and (E) increased by 533 (+3.6%). The relative impact is similar for other outputs.

Conclusions: Decision makers can estimate the potential impact of changing Specialist Treatment Access Rates for alcohol dependence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰地方当局酒精依赖专科治疗就诊率变化的潜在影响建模:酒精专业治疗模型(STreAM)。
目的我们模拟了不同治疗途径的专科治疗率变化对未来酒精依赖患病率、治疗效果、服务能力、成本和死亡率的影响:按轻度、中度、重度和复杂需求估算地方当局的人数和 "可能需要酒精依赖评估和专家服务治疗"(PINASTFAD)的患病率。管理数据用于估算每个 PINASTFAD 患者的专科治疗获得率,并对 22 种不同的治疗途径进行分类。其他模型输入包括自然缓解、治疗后复发、服务成本和死亡率。"假设 "分析评估专家治疗率和治疗途径的变化。模型输出包括 PINASTFAD 患者的人数和患病率、22 种治疗途径的治疗人数、治疗结果(成功完成治疗并戒酒、成功控制非问题性饮酒、6 个月内重新接受治疗、辍学、转院、监护)、死亡率、治疗能力要求(与社区服务机构联系或住院治疗的人数)、治疗总成本以及一般医疗费用节省情况。五种方案说明了其功能性:(a)无变化,(b)达到全国第 70 百分位数的就诊率,(c)增加 25%的就诊率,(d)增加到苏格兰的就诊率,以及(e)减少 25%的就诊率:基线时,14,581 人患有 PINASTFAD(占成人的 2.43%),专科治疗获得率为 10.84%。各方案对 PINASTFAD 人数的 5 年影响(与不变相比)分别为:(B) 减少 191 人 (-1.3%),(C) 减少 477 人 (-3.3%),(D) 减少近 2,800 人 (-19.2%),(E) 增加 533 人 (+3.6%)。其他产出的相对影响类似:决策者可以估算出改变酒精依赖专科治疗率的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Youth Cognitive Responses to Alcohol Promotional Messaging: A Systematic Review. Alcohol Marketing and Adolescent and Young Adult Alcohol Use Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies. Exposure to Digital Alcohol Marketing and Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review. A Neurobiological Model of Alcohol Marketing Effects on Underage Drinking. Psychological Processes Underlying Effects of Alcohol Marketing on Youth Drinking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1