Fiona J Ramage, Alexander S Clewlow, Lynda M Williams, Malcolm R Macleod, Rosamund F Langston
{"title":"Effects of dietary fat manipulation on cognition in mice and rats: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fiona J Ramage, Alexander S Clewlow, Lynda M Williams, Malcolm R Macleod, Rosamund F Langston","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2020-100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>The Western diet that comprises high levels of long-chain saturated fats and sugar is associated not only with metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes but also has been recently linked to brain changes and cognitive dysfunction. However, in animal studies, reported effects are variable, and the mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. In the proposed review, we aim to summarise the diverse evidence of the effects of so-called 'high-fat' and ketogenic diets on behavioural measures of cognition in postweaning mice and rats, relative to animals on standard diets and to determine potential underlying mechanisms of high-fat diet-induced effects.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>A comprehensive search strategy was designed to retrieve studies reporting use of a high-fat or ketogenic diet in postweaning mice and rats that included cognitive assessments. Three databases (Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched and 4487 unique references were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Screening and annotation: </strong>Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers, with 330 studies retained for analysis. Characteristics of disease model choice, experimental design, intervention use and outcome assessment are to be extracted using the Systematic Review Facility (http://syrf.org.uk/) tool. Studies will be assessed for study quality and risk of bias and confidence of mechanistic involvement.</p><p><strong>Data management and reporting: </strong>For cognitive outcomes, effect sizes will be calculated using normalised mean difference and summarised using a random effects model. The contribution of potential sources of heterogeneity to the observed effects of diet on cognition will be assessed using multivariable meta-regression, with partitioning of heterogeneity as a sensitivity analysis. A preliminary version of this protocol was published on 9 April 2019 on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies website (http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/camarades/research.html%23protocols).</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>No ethical approval is required as there are no subjects in the proposed study.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":"4 1","pages":"e100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100108","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2020-100108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Introduction and objective: The Western diet that comprises high levels of long-chain saturated fats and sugar is associated not only with metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes but also has been recently linked to brain changes and cognitive dysfunction. However, in animal studies, reported effects are variable, and the mechanisms underlying these effects are unclear. In the proposed review, we aim to summarise the diverse evidence of the effects of so-called 'high-fat' and ketogenic diets on behavioural measures of cognition in postweaning mice and rats, relative to animals on standard diets and to determine potential underlying mechanisms of high-fat diet-induced effects.
Search strategy: A comprehensive search strategy was designed to retrieve studies reporting use of a high-fat or ketogenic diet in postweaning mice and rats that included cognitive assessments. Three databases (Medline, SCOPUS and Web of Science) were searched and 4487 unique references were retrieved.
Screening and annotation: Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers, with 330 studies retained for analysis. Characteristics of disease model choice, experimental design, intervention use and outcome assessment are to be extracted using the Systematic Review Facility (http://syrf.org.uk/) tool. Studies will be assessed for study quality and risk of bias and confidence of mechanistic involvement.
Data management and reporting: For cognitive outcomes, effect sizes will be calculated using normalised mean difference and summarised using a random effects model. The contribution of potential sources of heterogeneity to the observed effects of diet on cognition will be assessed using multivariable meta-regression, with partitioning of heterogeneity as a sensitivity analysis. A preliminary version of this protocol was published on 9 April 2019 on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies website (http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/camarades/research.html%23protocols).
Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is required as there are no subjects in the proposed study.
简介和目的:含有大量长链饱和脂肪和糖的西方饮食不仅与代谢紊乱(如肥胖和2型糖尿病)有关,最近还与大脑变化和认知功能障碍有关。然而,在动物研究中,报告的影响是可变的,并且这些影响的机制尚不清楚。在这篇综述中,我们的目标是总结“高脂肪”和生酮饮食对断奶后小鼠和大鼠认知行为测量的影响的各种证据,并确定高脂肪饮食诱导效应的潜在潜在机制。检索策略:设计了一个全面的检索策略,以检索报道在断奶后小鼠和大鼠中使用高脂肪或生酮饮食的研究,包括认知评估。检索三个数据库(Medline、SCOPUS和Web of Science),检索到4487篇唯一参考文献。筛选和注释:研究由两名独立审稿人筛选纳入,其中330项研究保留用于分析。使用系统评价工具(http://syrf.org.uk/)提取疾病模型选择、实验设计、干预措施使用和结果评估的特征。将对研究质量、偏倚风险和机械介入的置信度进行评估。数据管理和报告:对于认知结果,效应大小将使用归一化平均差计算,并使用随机效应模型进行汇总。异质性的潜在来源对观察到的饮食对认知的影响的贡献将使用多变量元回归进行评估,异质性的划分作为敏感性分析。该方案的初步版本于2019年4月9日发表在《实验研究网站(http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/camarades/research.html%23protocols).Ethics)动物数据荟萃分析和审查的协作方法》和《传播:不需要伦理批准,因为拟议研究中没有受试者》上。