首页 > 最新文献

BMJ Open Science最新文献

英文 中文
Correction: Preclinical safety study of nacre powder in an intraosseous sheep model. 更正:珍珠粉在绵羊骨内模型中的临床前安全性研究。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231corr1

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231.].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231.].
{"title":"Correction: Preclinical safety study of nacre powder in an intraosseous sheep model.","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231corr1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231corr1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231.].</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412327/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protocol for a systematic review of the validity of animal models of polydipsia with a basis in schizophrenia aetiology. 以精神分裂症病因学为基础,对烦渴动物模型有效性进行系统评价的方案。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2022-100276
Brian J Slattery, Sophie Sabherwal, William T O'Connor
Objective Primary polydipsia most commonly affects those with schizophrenia. The pathophysiology of this occurrence is not established. The aim of this systematic review is to critically assess the internal and external validity of the preclinical animal models available. Search strategy PubMed and Embase will be searched systematically to identify all relevant animal studies that describe polydipsia induction with a basis in schizophrenia aetiology. The SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation) search filters to identify all animal studies in both databases will be used. All studies published up to the date of the search will be considered. Screening and annotation Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved studies for eligibility based on (1) title and abstract and (2) full text. Disagreements between researchers will be resolved by discussion and referral back to the predefined eligibility criteria with involvement of a third researcher if required.
目的:原发性烦渴最常见于精神分裂症患者。这种发生的病理生理学尚未确定。本系统综述的目的是批判性地评估现有临床前动物模型的内部和外部有效性。检索策略:将系统地检索PubMed和Embase,以确定所有描述以精神分裂症病因为基础的烦渴诱导的相关动物研究。将使用sycle(实验动物实验系统评价中心)搜索过滤器来识别两个数据库中的所有动物研究。将考虑到搜索日期之前发表的所有研究。筛选和注释:两名独立审稿人将根据(1)标题和摘要和(2)全文对检索到的研究进行筛选。研究人员之间的分歧将通过讨论来解决,如果需要,第三位研究人员的参与将被推荐回预定义的资格标准。
{"title":"Protocol for a systematic review of the validity of animal models of polydipsia with a basis in schizophrenia aetiology.","authors":"Brian J Slattery,&nbsp;Sophie Sabherwal,&nbsp;William T O'Connor","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2022-100276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2022-100276","url":null,"abstract":"Objective Primary polydipsia most commonly affects those with schizophrenia. The pathophysiology of this occurrence is not established. The aim of this systematic review is to critically assess the internal and external validity of the preclinical animal models available. Search strategy PubMed and Embase will be searched systematically to identify all relevant animal studies that describe polydipsia induction with a basis in schizophrenia aetiology. The SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation) search filters to identify all animal studies in both databases will be used. All studies published up to the date of the search will be considered. Screening and annotation Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved studies for eligibility based on (1) title and abstract and (2) full text. Disagreements between researchers will be resolved by discussion and referral back to the predefined eligibility criteria with involvement of a third researcher if required.","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644721/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40469585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preclinical safety study of nacre powder in an intraosseous sheep model. 在绵羊骨内模型中对珍珠粉进行临床前安全性研究。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231
Donata Iandolo, Norbert Laroche, Dung Kim Nguyen, Miriam Normand, Christophe Met, Ganggang Zhang, Laurence Vico, Didier Mainard, Marthe Rousseau

Objectives: The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the safety, the local tissue effects and bone healing performance (osteoconduction, osseointegration) of nacre powder in a sheep intraosseous implantation model. This represents the first preclinical study to assess nacre safety and efficacy in supporting new bone formation in accordance with the ISO 10993 standard for biomedical devices.

Methods: The local tissue effects and the material performance were evaluated 8 weeks after implantation by qualitative macroscopic observation and qualitative as well as semiquantitative microscopic analyses of the bone sites. Histopathological characterisations were run to assess local tissue effects. In addition, microarchitectural, histomorphometric and histological characterisations were used to evaluate the effects of the implanted material.

Results: Nacre powder was shown to cause a moderate inflammatory response in the site where it was implanted compared with the sites left empty. The biomaterial implanted within the generated defects was almost entirely degraded over the investigated time span and resulted in the formation of new bone with a seamless connection with the surrounding tissue. On the contrary, in the empty defects, the formation of a thick compact band of sclerotic bone was observed by both microarchitectural and histological characterisation.

Conclusions: Nacre powder was confirmed to be a safe biomaterial for bone regeneration applications in vivo, while supporting bone formation.

研究目的这项临床前研究旨在评估珍珠粉在绵羊骨内植入模型中的安全性、局部组织效应和骨愈合性能(骨传导、骨结合)。这是首次根据 ISO 10993 生物医学设备标准,对珍珠岩在支持新骨形成方面的安全性和功效进行评估的临床前研究:方法:通过对骨骼部位进行定性宏观观察、定性和半定量显微分析,评估植入8周后的局部组织效应和材料性能。组织病理学特征分析用于评估局部组织效应。此外,还使用微结构、组织形态计量学和组织学特征分析来评估植入材料的效果:结果:结果表明,在植入珍珠质粉末的部位,与没有植入粉末的部位相比,会引起中度炎症反应。在研究时间跨度内,植入缺损部位的生物材料几乎完全降解,并形成了与周围组织无缝连接的新骨。相反,在空的缺损部位,通过微观结构和组织学特征观察,形成了厚实的硬化骨带:结论:珍珠岩粉末被证实是一种安全的生物材料,可用于体内骨再生应用,同时支持骨形成。
{"title":"Preclinical safety study of nacre powder in an intraosseous sheep model.","authors":"Donata Iandolo, Norbert Laroche, Dung Kim Nguyen, Miriam Normand, Christophe Met, Ganggang Zhang, Laurence Vico, Didier Mainard, Marthe Rousseau","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100231","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the safety, the local tissue effects and bone healing performance (osteoconduction, osseointegration) of nacre powder in a sheep intraosseous implantation model. This represents the first preclinical study to assess nacre safety and efficacy in supporting new bone formation in accordance with the ISO 10993 standard for biomedical devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The local tissue effects and the material performance were evaluated 8 weeks after implantation by qualitative macroscopic observation and qualitative as well as semiquantitative microscopic analyses of the bone sites. Histopathological characterisations were run to assess local tissue effects. In addition, microarchitectural, histomorphometric and histological characterisations were used to evaluate the effects of the implanted material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nacre powder was shown to cause a moderate inflammatory response in the site where it was implanted compared with the sites left empty. The biomaterial implanted within the generated defects was almost entirely degraded over the investigated time span and resulted in the formation of new bone with a seamless connection with the surrounding tissue. On the contrary, in the empty defects, the formation of a thick compact band of sclerotic bone was observed by both microarchitectural and histological characterisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nacre powder was confirmed to be a safe biomaterial for bone regeneration applications in vivo, while supporting bone formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40469587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protocol for a systematic review of good surgical practice guidelines for experimental rodent surgery. 实验性啮齿动物外科良好手术规范指南系统审查方案。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2022-100280
Felix Gantenbein, Tim Buchholz, Kimberley Elaine Wever, Merel Ritskes Hoitinga, Stephan Zeiter, Petra Seebeck

Objective: Surgery is an integral part of many experimental studies. Aseptic and minimal invasive surgical technique and optimal perioperative and post-operative care are prerequisites to achieve surgical success and best possible animal welfare outcomes. Good surgical practice cannot only improve the animal's postoperative recovery, but also study outcome and validity. There seems to be a lack of implementation of good surgical practice during rodent surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, critically evaluate and compare the currently recommended standards and underlying guidelines for rodent surgery-and finally to compile a comprehensive guideline of good surgical practice for rodent surgery.

Search strategy: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched to identify guidelines published in peer-reviewed journals. To identify grey literature and unpublished guidelines, we will perform a Google search for published guidelines and search laboratory animal sciences books for relevant book chapters. Additionally, we will conduct a survey among animal researchers enquiring about the guidelines they use.

Screening and study selection: For publications retrieved by the systematic search, unique references are screened by two reviewers, first for eligibility based on title and abstract and subsequently for final inclusion based on full text. Eligibility of books is based on title and content, final inclusion based on chapter full text. Guidelines are either retrieved by Google searches or a survey. Google searches will be conducted by at least four of the authors. Thereafter, guidelines will be screened by two of the authors.

Data extraction and synthesis: We will extract data from publications, book chapters and guidelines. Based on the extracted data, we will perform a descriptive synthesis of the bibliographical details, guideline development and endorsement, and the prevalence of individual recommendations, including subgroup analysis of the guidance per continent or country and differences between peer-reviewed versus non-peer-reviewed guidance.

目的:外科是许多实验研究中不可分割的一部分。无菌和微创手术技术以及最佳的围手术期和术后护理是实现手术成功和最佳动物福利结果的先决条件。良好的手术操作不仅可以提高动物的术后恢复,而且可以提高研究的结果和有效性。在啮齿动物手术中,似乎缺乏良好的外科实践。本系统综述的目的是识别、批判性评估和比较目前推荐的啮齿动物外科标准和基本指南,并最终编制一份全面的啮齿动物外科良好手术规范指南。检索策略:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science以确定发表在同行评议期刊上的指南。为了识别灰色文献和未发表的指南,我们将对已发表的指南进行谷歌搜索,并搜索实验动物科学书籍的相关章节。此外,我们将在动物研究人员中进行调查,询问他们使用的指导方针。筛选和研究选择:对于通过系统搜索检索到的出版物,唯一的参考文献由两位审稿人筛选,首先根据标题和摘要筛选合格性,然后根据全文筛选最终纳入。图书资格以标题和内容为准,最终以章节全文为准。指南可以通过谷歌搜索或调查来检索。谷歌搜索将由至少四位作者进行。之后,指南将由两位作者进行筛选。数据提取和综合:我们将从出版物、书籍章节和指南中提取数据。基于提取的数据,我们将对书目细节、指南制定和认可以及个别建议的流行情况进行描述性综合,包括对各大洲或国家指南的亚组分析以及同行评议与非同行评议指南之间的差异。
{"title":"Protocol for a systematic review of good surgical practice guidelines for experimental rodent surgery.","authors":"Felix Gantenbein,&nbsp;Tim Buchholz,&nbsp;Kimberley Elaine Wever,&nbsp;Merel Ritskes Hoitinga,&nbsp;Stephan Zeiter,&nbsp;Petra Seebeck","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2022-100280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2022-100280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgery is an integral part of many experimental studies. Aseptic and minimal invasive surgical technique and optimal perioperative and post-operative care are prerequisites to achieve surgical success and best possible animal welfare outcomes. Good surgical practice cannot only improve the animal's postoperative recovery, but also study outcome and validity. There seems to be a lack of implementation of good surgical practice during rodent surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, critically evaluate and compare the currently recommended standards and underlying guidelines for rodent surgery-and finally to compile a comprehensive guideline of good surgical practice for rodent surgery.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched to identify guidelines published in peer-reviewed journals. To identify grey literature and unpublished guidelines, we will perform a Google search for published guidelines and search laboratory animal sciences books for relevant book chapters. Additionally, we will conduct a survey among animal researchers enquiring about the guidelines they use.</p><p><strong>Screening and study selection: </strong>For publications retrieved by the systematic search, unique references are screened by two reviewers, first for eligibility based on title and abstract and subsequently for final inclusion based on full text. Eligibility of books is based on title and content, final inclusion based on chapter full text. Guidelines are either retrieved by Google searches or a survey. Google searches will be conducted by at least four of the authors. Thereafter, guidelines will be screened by two of the authors.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>We will extract data from publications, book chapters and guidelines. Based on the extracted data, we will perform a descriptive synthesis of the bibliographical details, guideline development and endorsement, and the prevalence of individual recommendations, including subgroup analysis of the guidance per continent or country and differences between peer-reviewed versus non-peer-reviewed guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40469142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genome-wide DNA methylation in an animal model and human studies of schizophrenia: a protocol for a meta-analysis. 精神分裂症动物模型和人类研究中的全基因组DNA甲基化:一项荟萃分析方案。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100264
Thabo Magwai, Fredrick Otieno Oginga, Bonginkosi Chiliza, Thabisile Mpofana, Khethelo Richman Xulu

Introduction and objective: Neuropsychiatric disorders like schizophrenia are heterogeneous in that they occur because of the interaction of factors. These factors include but are not limited to genetic, epigenetic, neurobiological and environmental factors. Methylation of DNA, like other erpigenetic modifications, is risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders. Candidate gene approach projects have produced contradictory results to find candidate gene methylation. The current genome-wide studies have limitations.

Search strategy: An exhaustive search strategy was designed to recover studies on genome-wide DNA methylation in schizophrenia patients or schizophrenia rat models. The Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science, databases were searched, giving 4077 references in total.

Screening and annotation: Studies will undergo two phases of screening, title and abstract screening and article screening, for inclusion by two reviewers. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements in the article screening phase. Data will be collected using the Systematic Review Facility (http://syrf.org.uk/) tool. All included studies will undergo study quality and risk of bias assessment.

Data management and reporting: Data will be extracted and used to calculate effect sizes. For the purpose of this meta-analysis, a random effects model will be used to combine effect sizes. Heterogeneity will be assessed, and the sources identified. A risk-of-bias assessment will be carried out to assess the quality of the studies. An assessment of publication bias will also be carried out.

Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is required as there are no participants in the study. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and disseminate the findings through publication and conference presentation.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021283159.

简介和目的:精神分裂症等神经精神疾病是异质性的,因为它们是由于各种因素的相互作用而发生的。这些因素包括但不限于遗传、表观遗传、神经生物学和环境因素。像其他表观遗传修饰一样,DNA甲基化是神经精神疾病的危险因素。候选基因方法项目在寻找候选基因甲基化方面产生了相互矛盾的结果。目前的全基因组研究存在局限性。搜索策略:穷尽搜索策略旨在恢复精神分裂症患者或精神分裂症大鼠模型中全基因组DNA甲基化的研究。检索Medline (PubMed)、SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库,共收录文献4077篇。筛选和注释:研究将经过两个阶段的筛选,标题和摘要筛选和文章筛选,由两名审稿人纳入。第三审稿人将在文章筛选阶段解决任何分歧。数据将通过系统审查工具(http://syrf.org.uk/)收集。所有纳入的研究都将进行研究质量和偏倚风险评估。数据管理和报告:数据将被提取并用于计算效应量。为了这个荟萃分析的目的,将使用随机效应模型来组合效应大小。将评估异质性,并确定来源。将进行风险偏倚评估以评估研究的质量。还将对发表偏倚进行评估。伦理与传播:由于本研究没有参与者,因此不需要伦理批准。我们将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目,并通过出版物和会议报告传播研究结果。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021283159。
{"title":"Genome-wide DNA methylation in an animal model and human studies of schizophrenia: a protocol for a meta-analysis.","authors":"Thabo Magwai,&nbsp;Fredrick Otieno Oginga,&nbsp;Bonginkosi Chiliza,&nbsp;Thabisile Mpofana,&nbsp;Khethelo Richman Xulu","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Neuropsychiatric disorders like schizophrenia are heterogeneous in that they occur because of the interaction of factors. These factors include but are not limited to genetic, epigenetic, neurobiological and environmental factors. Methylation of DNA, like other erpigenetic modifications, is risk factors for neuropsychiatric disorders. Candidate gene approach projects have produced contradictory results to find candidate gene methylation. The current genome-wide studies have limitations.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>An exhaustive search strategy was designed to recover studies on genome-wide DNA methylation in schizophrenia patients or schizophrenia rat models. The Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science, databases were searched, giving 4077 references in total.</p><p><strong>Screening and annotation: </strong>Studies will undergo two phases of screening, title and abstract screening and article screening, for inclusion by two reviewers. A third reviewer will resolve any disagreements in the article screening phase. Data will be collected using the Systematic Review Facility (http://syrf.org.uk/) tool. All included studies will undergo study quality and risk of bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Data management and reporting: </strong>Data will be extracted and used to calculate effect sizes. For the purpose of this meta-analysis, a random effects model will be used to combine effect sizes. Heterogeneity will be assessed, and the sources identified. A risk-of-bias assessment will be carried out to assess the quality of the studies. An assessment of publication bias will also be carried out.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>No ethical approval is required as there are no participants in the study. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines and disseminate the findings through publication and conference presentation.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021283159.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40469586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meta-analysis on reporting practices as a source of heterogeneity in in vitro cancer research. 对作为体外癌症研究异质性来源的报告方法进行元分析。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100272
Timo Sander, Joly Ghanawi, Emma Wilson, Sajjad Muhammad, Malcolm Macleod, Ulf Dietrich Kahlert

Objectives: Heterogeneity of results of exact same research experiments oppose a significant socioeconomic burden. Insufficient methodological reporting is likely to be one of the contributors to results heterogeneity; however, little knowledge on reporting habits of in vitro cancer research and their effects on results reproducibility is available. Exemplified by a commonly performed in vitro assay, we aim to fill this knowledge gap and to derive recommendations necessary for reproducible, robust and translational preclinical science.

Methods: Here, we use systematic review to describe reporting practices in in vitro glioblastoma research using the Uppsala-87 Malignant Glioma (U-87 MG) cell line and perform multilevel random-effects meta-analysis followed by meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity within that literature, and any associations between reporting characteristics and reported findings. Literature that includes experiments measuring the effect of temozolomide on the viability of U-87 MG cells is searched on three databases (Embase, PubMed and Web of Science).

Results: In 137 identified articles, the methodological reporting is incomplete, for example, medium glucose level and cell density are reported in only 21.2% and 16.8% of the articles. After adjustments for different drug concentrations and treatment durations, the results heterogeneity across the studies (I2=68.5%) is concerningly large. Differences in culture medium glucose level are a driver of this heterogeneity. However, infrequent reporting of most experimental parameters limits the analysis of reproducibility moderating parameters.

Conclusions: Our results further support the ongoing efforts of establishing consensus reporting practices to elevate durability of results. By doing so, this work can raise awareness of how stricter reporting may help to improve the frequency of successful translation of preclinical results into human application. The authors received no specific funding for this work. A preregistered protocol is available at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9k3dq).

目的:完全相同的研究实验结果的异质性会造成巨大的社会经济负担。方法学报告不足很可能是导致结果异质性的原因之一;然而,关于体外癌症研究的报告习惯及其对结果可重复性的影响,目前却知之甚少。方法:在此,我们利用系统综述描述了使用乌普萨拉-87 恶性胶质瘤(U-87 MG)细胞系进行体外胶质母细胞瘤研究的报告习惯,并进行了多层次随机效应荟萃分析(multi-level random-effects meta-analysis),随后进行了元回归(meta-regression),以探索文献中的异质性来源,以及报告特征与报告结果之间的任何关联。我们在三个数据库(Embase、PubMed 和 Web of Science)中检索了包含替莫唑胺对 U-87 MG 细胞活力影响实验的文献:结果:在已发现的 137 篇文章中,报告方法不完整,例如,仅有 21.2% 和 16.8% 的文章报告了培养基葡萄糖水平和细胞密度。在对不同药物浓度和治疗持续时间进行调整后,各研究结果的异质性(I2=68.5%)之大令人担忧。培养基葡萄糖水平的差异是造成这种异质性的原因之一。然而,由于大多数实验参数的报告不频繁,限制了对可重复性调节参数的分析:我们的研究结果进一步支持了目前正在进行的建立共识报告实践的努力,以提高结果的持久性。通过这样做,这项工作可以提高人们对更严格的报告如何有助于提高临床前结果成功转化为人类应用的频率的认识。作者在这项工作中没有获得任何特定资助。预注册协议可在开放科学框架 (https://osf.io/9k3dq) 上查阅。
{"title":"Meta-analysis on reporting practices as a source of heterogeneity in in vitro cancer research.","authors":"Timo Sander, Joly Ghanawi, Emma Wilson, Sajjad Muhammad, Malcolm Macleod, Ulf Dietrich Kahlert","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100272","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Heterogeneity of results of exact same research experiments oppose a significant socioeconomic burden. Insufficient methodological reporting is likely to be one of the contributors to results heterogeneity; however, little knowledge on reporting habits of in vitro cancer research and their effects on results reproducibility is available. Exemplified by a commonly performed in vitro assay, we aim to fill this knowledge gap and to derive recommendations necessary for reproducible, robust and translational preclinical science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we use systematic review to describe reporting practices in in vitro glioblastoma research using the Uppsala-87 Malignant Glioma (U-87 MG) cell line and perform multilevel random-effects meta-analysis followed by meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity within that literature, and any associations between reporting characteristics and reported findings. Literature that includes experiments measuring the effect of temozolomide on the viability of U-87 MG cells is searched on three databases (Embase, PubMed and Web of Science).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 137 identified articles, the methodological reporting is incomplete, for example, medium glucose level and cell density are reported in only 21.2% and 16.8% of the articles. After adjustments for different drug concentrations and treatment durations, the results heterogeneity across the studies (I<sup>2</sup>=68.5%) is concerningly large. Differences in culture medium glucose level are a driver of this heterogeneity. However, infrequent reporting of most experimental parameters limits the analysis of reproducibility moderating parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results further support the ongoing efforts of establishing consensus reporting practices to elevate durability of results. By doing so, this work can raise awareness of how stricter reporting may help to improve the frequency of successful translation of preclinical results into human application. The authors received no specific funding for this work. A preregistered protocol is available at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9k3dq).</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171230/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40041593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Road to FAIR genomes: a gap analysis of NGS data generation and sharing in the Netherlands 通往公平基因组之路:荷兰NGS数据生成和共享的差距分析
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100268
J. Belien, A. Kip, M. Swertz
Objective This study investigates current standards and operational gaps in the management and sharing of next generation sequencing (NGS) data within the healthcare and research setting and according to Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) principles. Methods The analysis was performed as the basis from which to bridge identified gaps and develop widely accepted working standards that ensure optimal reusability of genomic data in healthcare and research settings in the Netherlands. This work is part of the ‘Rational Pharmacotherapy Program’ led by ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, which aims to promote the efficient implementation of NGS and personalised medicine within Dutch healthcare, with an initial focus on oncology and rare diseases. Results Based on this analysis and as part of this programme, a consortium was formed to develop an instruction manual for FAIR genomic data in clinical care and research based on an inventory of commonly used workflows and standards in the (inter)national field of genome analysis. Conclusions The gap analysis presented and discussed in this paper represents the starting point for this inventory and is a possible contribution from the Netherlands to the European 1+ Million Genomes Initiative. This paper addresses the topics of data generation, data quality, (meta)data standards, data storage and archiving and data integration and exchange.
目的本研究根据可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重复使用(FAIR)原则,调查医疗保健和研究环境中下一代测序(NGS)数据管理和共享的现行标准和操作差距。方法该分析是弥合已发现的差距并制定广泛接受的工作标准的基础,以确保基因组数据在荷兰医疗保健和研究环境中的最佳可重用性。这项工作是荷兰卫生研究与发展组织ZonMw领导的“合理药物治疗计划”的一部分,该计划旨在促进荷兰医疗保健中NGS和个性化药物的有效实施,最初重点关注肿瘤学和罕见病。结果基于这一分析,作为该计划的一部分,成立了一个联盟,根据国家间基因组分析领域常用的工作流程和标准清单,为临床护理和研究中的FAIR基因组数据制定指导手册。结论本文中提出和讨论的差距分析是该清单的起点,也是荷兰对欧洲100多万基因组计划的可能贡献。本文讨论了数据生成、数据质量、(元数据)标准、数据存储和归档以及数据集成和交换等主题。
{"title":"Road to FAIR genomes: a gap analysis of NGS data generation and sharing in the Netherlands","authors":"J. Belien, A. Kip, M. Swertz","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100268","url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study investigates current standards and operational gaps in the management and sharing of next generation sequencing (NGS) data within the healthcare and research setting and according to Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) principles. Methods The analysis was performed as the basis from which to bridge identified gaps and develop widely accepted working standards that ensure optimal reusability of genomic data in healthcare and research settings in the Netherlands. This work is part of the ‘Rational Pharmacotherapy Program’ led by ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, which aims to promote the efficient implementation of NGS and personalised medicine within Dutch healthcare, with an initial focus on oncology and rare diseases. Results Based on this analysis and as part of this programme, a consortium was formed to develop an instruction manual for FAIR genomic data in clinical care and research based on an inventory of commonly used workflows and standards in the (inter)national field of genome analysis. Conclusions The gap analysis presented and discussed in this paper represents the starting point for this inventory and is a possible contribution from the Netherlands to the European 1+ Million Genomes Initiative. This paper addresses the topics of data generation, data quality, (meta)data standards, data storage and archiving and data integration and exchange.","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42267168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
What has preclinical systematic review ever done for us? 临床前系统评价为我们做了什么?
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100219
A. A. M. Russell, B. Sutherland, Lila M Landowski, Malcolm R Macleod, D. Howells
Systematic review and meta-analysis are a gift to the modern researcher, delivering a crystallised understanding of the existing research data in any given space. This can include whether candidate drugs are likely to work or not and which are better than others, whether our models of disease have predictive value and how this might be improved and also how these all interact with disease pathophysiology. Grappling with the literature needed for such analyses is becoming increasingly difficult as the number of publications grows. However, narrowing the focus of a review to reduce workload runs the risk of diminishing the generalisability of conclusions drawn from such increasingly specific analyses. Moreover, at the same time as we gain greater insight into our topic, we also discover more about the flaws that undermine much scientific research. Systematic review and meta-analysis have also shown that the quality of much preclinical research is inadequate. Systematic review has helped reveal the extent of selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias and low statistical power, raising questions about the validity of many preclinical research studies. This is perhaps the greatest virtue of systematic review and meta-analysis, the knowledge generated ultimately helps shed light on the limitations of existing research practice, and in doing so, helps bring reform and rigour to research across the sciences. In this commentary, we explore the lessons that we have identified through the lens of preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.
系统综述和荟萃分析是送给现代研究人员的礼物,可以对任何给定空间中的现有研究数据提供具体的理解。这可能包括候选药物是否可能有效,哪些药物比其他药物更好,我们的疾病模型是否具有预测价值,如何改进,以及这些药物如何与疾病病理生理学相互作用。随着出版物数量的增长,掌握此类分析所需的文献变得越来越困难。然而,缩小审查的重点以减少工作量,有可能削弱从这种日益具体的分析中得出的结论的普遍性。此外,在我们对我们的主题有了更深入的了解的同时,我们也发现了更多破坏许多科学研究的缺陷。系统综述和荟萃分析也表明,许多临床前研究的质量不足。系统综述有助于揭示选择偏差、表现偏差、检测偏差、损耗偏差和低统计能力的程度,这对许多临床前研究的有效性提出了质疑。这也许是系统综述和荟萃分析的最大优点,所产生的知识最终有助于揭示现有研究实践的局限性,并在这样做的过程中,有助于为整个科学的研究带来改革和严格性。在这篇评论中,我们从临床前系统综述和荟萃分析的角度探讨了我们已经确定的经验教训。
{"title":"What has preclinical systematic review ever done for us?","authors":"A. A. M. Russell, B. Sutherland, Lila M Landowski, Malcolm R Macleod, D. Howells","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100219","url":null,"abstract":"Systematic review and meta-analysis are a gift to the modern researcher, delivering a crystallised understanding of the existing research data in any given space. This can include whether candidate drugs are likely to work or not and which are better than others, whether our models of disease have predictive value and how this might be improved and also how these all interact with disease pathophysiology. Grappling with the literature needed for such analyses is becoming increasingly difficult as the number of publications grows. However, narrowing the focus of a review to reduce workload runs the risk of diminishing the generalisability of conclusions drawn from such increasingly specific analyses. Moreover, at the same time as we gain greater insight into our topic, we also discover more about the flaws that undermine much scientific research. Systematic review and meta-analysis have also shown that the quality of much preclinical research is inadequate. Systematic review has helped reveal the extent of selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, attrition bias and low statistical power, raising questions about the validity of many preclinical research studies. This is perhaps the greatest virtue of systematic review and meta-analysis, the knowledge generated ultimately helps shed light on the limitations of existing research practice, and in doing so, helps bring reform and rigour to research across the sciences. In this commentary, we explore the lessons that we have identified through the lens of preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44930590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Preregistration of animal research protocols: development and 3-year overview of preclinicaltrials.eu 动物研究方案的预注册:临床前试验的发展和3年概述
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100259
Mira van der Naald, S. Chamuleau, J. M. L. Menon, Wim de Leeuw, J. de Haan, D. Duncker, K. Wever
Open, prospective registration of a study protocol can improve research rigour in a number of ways. Through preregistration, key features of the study’s methodology are recorded and maintained as a permanent record, enabling comparison of the completed study with what was planned. By recording the study hypothesis and planned outcomes a priori, preregistration creates transparency and can reduce the risk of several common biases, such as hypothesising after results are known and outcome switching or selective outcome reporting. Second, preregistration raises awareness of measures to reduce bias, such as randomisation and blinding. Third, preregistration provides a comprehensive listing of planned studies, which can prevent unnecessary duplication and reduce publication bias. Although commonly acknowledged and applied in clinical research since 2000, preregistration of animal studies is not yet the norm. In 2018 we launched the first dedicated, open, online register for animal study protocols: wwwpreclinicaltrialseu. Here, we provide insight in the development of preclinicaltrials.eu (PCT) and evaluate its use during the first 3 years after its launch. Furthermore, we elaborate on ongoing developments such as the rise of comparable registries, increasing support for preregistration in the Netherlands—which led to the funding of PCT by the Dutch government—and pilots of mandatory preregistration by several funding bodies. We show the international coverage of currently registered protocols but with the overall low number of (pre)registered protocols.
开放的、前瞻性的研究方案注册可以在许多方面提高研究的严谨性。通过预登记,研究方法的关键特征被记录并保存为永久记录,以便将完成的研究与计划的研究进行比较。通过先验地记录研究假设和计划结果,预登记创造了透明度,并可以减少几种常见偏差的风险,例如在结果已知后进行假设,结果切换或选择性结果报告。其次,预注册提高了人们对减少偏倚措施的认识,例如随机化和盲法。第三,预注册提供了一个全面的计划研究清单,可以防止不必要的重复,减少发表偏倚。虽然自2000年以来在临床研究中得到普遍认可和应用,但动物研究的预注册尚未成为规范。2018年,我们推出了第一个专门的、开放的动物研究方案在线注册:www.preclinicaltrialseu。在这里,我们为临床前试验的发展提供见解。欧盟(PCT),并在其启动后的头3年内评估其使用情况。此外,我们还详细介绍了正在进行的发展,如可比注册机构的增加,荷兰对预注册的支持不断增加(这导致荷兰政府为PCT提供资金),以及一些资助机构开展的强制性预注册试点。我们展示了当前注册协议的国际覆盖范围,但总体上(预)注册协议的数量较少。
{"title":"Preregistration of animal research protocols: development and 3-year overview of preclinicaltrials.eu","authors":"Mira van der Naald, S. Chamuleau, J. M. L. Menon, Wim de Leeuw, J. de Haan, D. Duncker, K. Wever","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2021-100259","url":null,"abstract":"Open, prospective registration of a study protocol can improve research rigour in a number of ways. Through preregistration, key features of the study’s methodology are recorded and maintained as a permanent record, enabling comparison of the completed study with what was planned. By recording the study hypothesis and planned outcomes a priori, preregistration creates transparency and can reduce the risk of several common biases, such as hypothesising after results are known and outcome switching or selective outcome reporting. Second, preregistration raises awareness of measures to reduce bias, such as randomisation and blinding. Third, preregistration provides a comprehensive listing of planned studies, which can prevent unnecessary duplication and reduce publication bias. Although commonly acknowledged and applied in clinical research since 2000, preregistration of animal studies is not yet the norm. In 2018 we launched the first dedicated, open, online register for animal study protocols: wwwpreclinicaltrialseu. Here, we provide insight in the development of preclinicaltrials.eu (PCT) and evaluate its use during the first 3 years after its launch. Furthermore, we elaborate on ongoing developments such as the rise of comparable registries, increasing support for preregistration in the Netherlands—which led to the funding of PCT by the Dutch government—and pilots of mandatory preregistration by several funding bodies. We show the international coverage of currently registered protocols but with the overall low number of (pre)registered protocols.","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63868869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Fibroblasts: the neglected cell type in peripheral sensitisation and chronic pain? A review based on a systematic search of the literature. 成纤维细胞:外周敏化和慢性疼痛中被忽视的细胞类型?基于系统性文献检索的综述。
Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2021-100235
Naomi Shinotsuka, Franziska Denk

Chronic pain and its underlying biological mechanisms have been studied for many decades, with a myriad of molecules, receptors and cell types known to contribute to abnormal pain sensations. Besides an obvious role for neurons, immune cells like microglia, macrophages and T cells are also important drivers of persistent pain. While neuroinflammation has therefore been widely studied in pain research, there is one cell type that appears to be rather neglected in this context: the humble fibroblast. Fibroblasts may seem unassuming but actually play a major part in regulating immune cell function and driving chronic inflammation. Here, our aim was to determine the breadth and quality of research that implicates fibroblasts in chronic pain conditions and models.

Objectives: We set out to analyse the current literature on this topic-using systematic screening and data extraction methods to obtain a balanced view on what has been published.

Methods: We categorised the articles we included-stratifying them according to what was investigated, the estimated quality of results and any common conclusions.

Results: We found that there has been surprisingly little research in this area: 134 articles met our inclusion criteria, only a tiny minority of which directly investigated interactions between fibroblasts and peripheral neurons.

Conclusions: Fibroblasts are a ubiquitous cell type and a prominent source of many proalgesic mediators in a wide variety of tissues. We think that they deserve a more central role in pain research and propose a new, testable model of how fibroblasts might drive peripheral neuron sensitisation.

几十年来,人们一直在研究慢性疼痛及其潜在的生物机制,已知有无数的分子、受体和细胞类型会导致异常痛觉。除了神经元的明显作用外,小胶质细胞、巨噬细胞和 T 细胞等免疫细胞也是导致持续性疼痛的重要因素。因此,神经炎症在疼痛研究中被广泛研究,但有一种细胞类型在这方面似乎被忽视了,那就是不起眼的成纤维细胞。成纤维细胞看似不起眼,但实际上在调节免疫细胞功能和驱动慢性炎症方面发挥着重要作用。在这里,我们的目的是确定将成纤维细胞与慢性疼痛状况和模型相关联的研究的广度和质量:我们着手分析当前有关这一主题的文献,采用系统筛选和数据提取方法,以获得对已发表文献的平衡观点:方法:我们对收录的文章进行了分类,根据研究内容、结果的估计质量和共同结论对文章进行了分级:结果:我们发现该领域的研究少得令人吃惊:134篇文章符合我们的纳入标准,其中只有极少数文章直接研究了成纤维细胞与外周神经元之间的相互作用:成纤维细胞是一种无处不在的细胞类型,也是多种组织中许多镇痛介质的主要来源。我们认为成纤维细胞应该在疼痛研究中发挥更重要的作用,并提出了一个新的、可检验的模型,说明成纤维细胞如何驱动外周神经元敏感化。
{"title":"Fibroblasts: the neglected cell type in peripheral sensitisation and chronic pain? A review based on a systematic search of the literature.","authors":"Naomi Shinotsuka, Franziska Denk","doi":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100235","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjos-2021-100235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain and its underlying biological mechanisms have been studied for many decades, with a myriad of molecules, receptors and cell types known to contribute to abnormal pain sensations. Besides an obvious role for neurons, immune cells like microglia, macrophages and T cells are also important drivers of persistent pain. While neuroinflammation has therefore been widely studied in pain research, there is one cell type that appears to be rather neglected in this context: the humble fibroblast. Fibroblasts may seem unassuming but actually play a major part in regulating immune cell function and driving chronic inflammation. Here, our aim was to determine the breadth and quality of research that implicates fibroblasts in chronic pain conditions and models.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We set out to analyse the current literature on this topic-using systematic screening and data extraction methods to obtain a balanced view on what has been published.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorised the articles we included-stratifying them according to what was investigated, the estimated quality of results and any common conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that there has been surprisingly little research in this area: 134 articles met our inclusion criteria, only a tiny minority of which directly investigated interactions between fibroblasts and peripheral neurons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fibroblasts are a ubiquitous cell type and a prominent source of many proalgesic mediators in a wide variety of tissues. We think that they deserve a more central role in pain research and propose a new, testable model of how fibroblasts might drive peripheral neuron sensitisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9212,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768938/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39772106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BMJ Open Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1