An Alpha, Beta and Gamma Approach to Evaluating Occupational Health Organizational Interventions: Learning from the Measurement of Work-Family Conflict Change.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Occupational Health Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y
Beth A Livingston, Shaun Pichler, Ellen Ernst Kossek, Rebecca J Thompson, Todd Bodner
{"title":"An Alpha, Beta and Gamma Approach to Evaluating Occupational Health Organizational Interventions: Learning from the Measurement of Work-Family Conflict Change.","authors":"Beth A Livingston,&nbsp;Shaun Pichler,&nbsp;Ellen Ernst Kossek,&nbsp;Rebecca J Thompson,&nbsp;Todd Bodner","doi":"10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the rapid growth of intervention research in the occupational health sciences and related fields (e.g. work-family), we propose that occupational health scientists adopt an \"alpha, beta, gamma\" change approach when evaluating intervention efficacy. Interventions can affect absolute change in constructs directly (alpha change), changes in the scales used to assess change (beta change) or redefinitions of the construct itself (gamma change). Researchers should consider the extent to which they expect their intervention to affect each type of change and select evaluation approaches accordingly. We illustrate this approach using change data from groups of IT professionals and health care workers participating in the STAR intervention, designed by the Work Family Health Network. STAR was created to effect change in employee work-family conflict via supervisor family-supportive behaviors and schedule control. We hypothesize that it will affect change via all three change approaches-gamma, beta, and alpha. Using assessment techniques from measurement equivalence approaches, we find results consistent with some gamma and beta change in the IT company due to the intervention; our results suggest that not accounting for such change could affect the evaluation of alpha change. We demonstrate that using a tripartite model of change can help researchers more clearly specify intervention change targets and processes. This will enable the assessment of change in a way that has stronger fidelity between the theories used and the outcomes of interest. Our research has implications for how to assess change using a broader change framework, which employs measurement equivalence approaches in order to advance the design and deployment of more effective interventions in occupational settings.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":29938,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Health Science","volume":"6 4","pages":"513-543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the rapid growth of intervention research in the occupational health sciences and related fields (e.g. work-family), we propose that occupational health scientists adopt an "alpha, beta, gamma" change approach when evaluating intervention efficacy. Interventions can affect absolute change in constructs directly (alpha change), changes in the scales used to assess change (beta change) or redefinitions of the construct itself (gamma change). Researchers should consider the extent to which they expect their intervention to affect each type of change and select evaluation approaches accordingly. We illustrate this approach using change data from groups of IT professionals and health care workers participating in the STAR intervention, designed by the Work Family Health Network. STAR was created to effect change in employee work-family conflict via supervisor family-supportive behaviors and schedule control. We hypothesize that it will affect change via all three change approaches-gamma, beta, and alpha. Using assessment techniques from measurement equivalence approaches, we find results consistent with some gamma and beta change in the IT company due to the intervention; our results suggest that not accounting for such change could affect the evaluation of alpha change. We demonstrate that using a tripartite model of change can help researchers more clearly specify intervention change targets and processes. This will enable the assessment of change in a way that has stronger fidelity between the theories used and the outcomes of interest. Our research has implications for how to assess change using a broader change framework, which employs measurement equivalence approaches in order to advance the design and deployment of more effective interventions in occupational settings.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价职业健康组织干预的Alpha、Beta和Gamma方法:从工作-家庭冲突变化的测量中学习。
鉴于职业健康科学和相关领域(如工作-家庭)干预研究的快速发展,我们建议职业健康科学家在评估干预效果时采用“alpha, beta, gamma”变化方法。干预可以直接影响结构的绝对变化(α变化),用于评估变化的量表的变化(β变化)或结构本身的重新定义(γ变化)。研究人员应该考虑他们期望他们的干预影响每种类型的变化的程度,并相应地选择评估方法。我们使用参与STAR干预的IT专业人员和卫生保健工作者群体的变化数据来说明这种方法,STAR干预是由工作家庭健康网络设计的。本研究旨在透过主管家庭支持行为和进度控制来影响员工工作家庭冲突的改变。我们假设它将通过所有三种变化方法(gamma, beta和alpha)来影响变化。使用测量等效方法的评估技术,我们发现由于干预,结果与IT公司的一些gamma和beta变化一致;我们的结果表明,不考虑这种变化可能会影响alpha变化的评估。我们证明,使用三方变化模型可以帮助研究人员更清楚地指定干预变化的目标和过程。这将使评估变化的方式在所使用的理论和感兴趣的结果之间具有更强的保真度。我们的研究对如何使用更广泛的变革框架来评估变革具有启示意义,该框架采用测量等效方法,以推进职业环境中更有效干预措施的设计和部署。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s41542-022-00122-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Workplace Substance Use Programs, Policies, and Practices on Current Substance Use Among A National Sample of Low-Income Workers: Differences by Race/Ethnicity and Education Level An Evaluation of Indoor Sex Workers’ Psychosocial Occupational Health and Safety in Metro Vancouver, Canada Office Openess Affects Stress Regulation and Teamwork: A Neurophysiological Field Study Identifying Different Patterns of Citizenship Motives: A Latent Profile Analysis Methodological and Demographic Variation in Estimates of Economic Dependence Across Two Types of Gig Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1