Assessing endovascular team performances in a hybrid room using the Black Box system: a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3
Bart Doyen, Gilles Soenens, Blandine Maurel, Adrien Hertault, Lauren Gordon, Peter Vlerick, Frank Vermassen, Teodor Grantcharov, Isabelle van Herzeele
{"title":"Assessing endovascular team performances in a hybrid room using the Black Box system: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Bart Doyen,&nbsp;Gilles Soenens,&nbsp;Blandine Maurel,&nbsp;Adrien Hertault,&nbsp;Lauren Gordon,&nbsp;Peter Vlerick,&nbsp;Frank Vermassen,&nbsp;Teodor Grantcharov,&nbsp;Isabelle van Herzeele","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hybrid room (HR) is a complex, high-risk environment, requiring teams (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, technologists) to master various skills, including the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' principle of radiation safety. This prospective single center cohort reports the first use of the Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) in a HR. This medical data recording system captures procedural and audio-visual data to facilitate structured team performance analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients planned for endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or treatment of symptomatic iliac-femoral-popliteal atherosclerotic disease (Peripheral Vascular Interventions or PVI) were included. Validated measures and established assessment tools were used to assess (non-)technical skills, radiation safety performance and environmental distractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six EVAR and sixteen PVI procedures were captured. Technical performance for one EVAR was rated 19/35 on the procedure-specific scale, below the 'acceptable' score of 21. Technical skills were rated above acceptable in all PVI procedures. Shared decision making and leadership were rated highly in 12/22 cases, whereas surgical communication and nurses' task management were rated low in 14/22 cases. Team members rarely stepped back from the C-arm during digital subtraction angiography. Radiation safety behavior was scored below 'acceptable' in 14/22 cases. A median (interquartile range) number of 12 (6-23) auditory distractions was observed per procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ORBB facilitates holistic workplace-based assessment of endovascular performance in a HR by combining objective assessment parameters and rating scale-based evaluations. Strengths and weaknesses were identified in team members' (non-)technical and radiation safety practices. This technology has the potential to improve vascular surgical practice, though human input remains crucial. (NCT04854278).</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12226-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hybrid room (HR) is a complex, high-risk environment, requiring teams (surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, technologists) to master various skills, including the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' principle of radiation safety. This prospective single center cohort reports the first use of the Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) in a HR. This medical data recording system captures procedural and audio-visual data to facilitate structured team performance analysis.

Methods: Patients planned for endovascular repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or treatment of symptomatic iliac-femoral-popliteal atherosclerotic disease (Peripheral Vascular Interventions or PVI) were included. Validated measures and established assessment tools were used to assess (non-)technical skills, radiation safety performance and environmental distractions.

Results: Six EVAR and sixteen PVI procedures were captured. Technical performance for one EVAR was rated 19/35 on the procedure-specific scale, below the 'acceptable' score of 21. Technical skills were rated above acceptable in all PVI procedures. Shared decision making and leadership were rated highly in 12/22 cases, whereas surgical communication and nurses' task management were rated low in 14/22 cases. Team members rarely stepped back from the C-arm during digital subtraction angiography. Radiation safety behavior was scored below 'acceptable' in 14/22 cases. A median (interquartile range) number of 12 (6-23) auditory distractions was observed per procedure.

Conclusions: The ORBB facilitates holistic workplace-based assessment of endovascular performance in a HR by combining objective assessment parameters and rating scale-based evaluations. Strengths and weaknesses were identified in team members' (non-)technical and radiation safety practices. This technology has the potential to improve vascular surgical practice, though human input remains crucial. (NCT04854278).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用黑盒系统评估混合室血管内团队的表现:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:混合室(HR)是一个复杂、高风险的环境,需要团队(外科医生、麻醉师、护士、技术人员)掌握各种技能,包括“尽可能低”的辐射安全原则。本前瞻性单中心队列报告了在HR中首次使用手术室黑匣子(ORBB)。该医疗数据记录系统捕获程序和视听数据,以方便结构化的团队绩效分析。方法:纳入计划行血管内修复肾下腹主动脉瘤(EVAR)或治疗症状性髂-股-腘动脉粥样硬化疾病(外周血管干预或PVI)的患者。验证的措施和建立的评估工具用于评估(非)技术技能,辐射安全性能和环境干扰。结果:共捕获EVAR 6例,PVI 16例。一个EVAR的技术表现在手术特定量表上被评为19/35,低于“可接受”的21分。在所有PVI程序中,技术技能被评为可接受以上。12/22例患者对共同决策和领导评价较高,14/22例患者对手术沟通和护士任务管理评价较低。在数字减影血管造影术中,团队成员很少离开c臂。辐射安全行为评分低于“可接受”的有14/22。每个过程中观察到12(6-23)个听觉干扰的中位数(四分位数范围)。结论:ORBB通过结合客观评估参数和基于评分量表的评估,促进了HR血管内表现的整体工作场所评估。在团队成员的(非)技术和辐射安全实践中确定了优势和劣势。这项技术有可能改善血管手术实践,尽管人工输入仍然至关重要。(NCT04854278)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting. Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1