Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-31 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12636-X
Alice Lopes, Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Pedro Amorim, Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes, Luís Mendes Pedro
{"title":"Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review.","authors":"Alice Lopes, Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Pedro Amorim, Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes, Luís Mendes Pedro","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12636-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this new millennial, endovascular strategies have revolutionized the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). With reduced in-hospital mortality and good long-term outcomes TEVAR has become the gold standard for the treatment of complicated dissection and is gaining increasing support for its preventive applicability in some uncomplicated dissections. With this new paradigm came a shift of the treatment goal where just covering the entry tear is not enough and instead achieving long-term positive thoracoabdominal remodeling is needed. More extensive approaches with composite device designs (covered stent graft and bare metal stent) emerged to answer this aortic conundrum. At 5-year of follow-up, \"Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete Attachment technique\" (PETTICOAT) and its evolution \"Stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair\" (STABILISE) seem to be safe techniques that can allow, when anatomically feasible, excellent aortic remodeling and, in some cases, even the healing of the dissection. Nevertheless, STABILISE results, although promising, are mostly based on small series and therefore need to be validated by analyzing medium-long-term results from the international registry. Given the plethora of new data and the disparity of expert opinions on the best treatment to adopt, in this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the results of these different strategies for acute TBAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12636-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this new millennial, endovascular strategies have revolutionized the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). With reduced in-hospital mortality and good long-term outcomes TEVAR has become the gold standard for the treatment of complicated dissection and is gaining increasing support for its preventive applicability in some uncomplicated dissections. With this new paradigm came a shift of the treatment goal where just covering the entry tear is not enough and instead achieving long-term positive thoracoabdominal remodeling is needed. More extensive approaches with composite device designs (covered stent graft and bare metal stent) emerged to answer this aortic conundrum. At 5-year of follow-up, "Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete Attachment technique" (PETTICOAT) and its evolution "Stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair" (STABILISE) seem to be safe techniques that can allow, when anatomically feasible, excellent aortic remodeling and, in some cases, even the healing of the dissection. Nevertheless, STABILISE results, although promising, are mostly based on small series and therefore need to be validated by analyzing medium-long-term results from the international registry. Given the plethora of new data and the disparity of expert opinions on the best treatment to adopt, in this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the results of these different strategies for acute TBAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性 B 型主动脉夹层的现状:文献综述。
在新的千年里,血管内治疗策略彻底改变了急性 B 型主动脉夹层(aTBAD)的治疗方法。TEVAR 降低了院内死亡率,取得了良好的长期疗效,已成为治疗复杂性主动脉夹层的黄金标准,并因其对某些不复杂性主动脉夹层的预防性应用而获得越来越多的支持。随着这一新模式的出现,治疗目标也发生了转变,仅仅覆盖入口撕裂是不够的,还需要实现长期积极的胸腹重塑。为了解决这一主动脉难题,出现了更广泛的复合装置设计方法(覆盖支架移植物和裸金属支架)。在 5 年的随访中,"临时张力诱导完全附着技术"(PETTICOAT)及其演变版 "主动脉夹层修复中的支架辅助球囊诱导内膜破坏和再分层"(STABILISE)似乎是一种安全的技术,在解剖学可行的情况下,可以实现良好的主动脉重塑,在某些情况下甚至可以使夹层愈合。不过,STABILISE 的结果虽然很有希望,但大多是基于小规模的系列研究,因此需要通过分析国际登记处的中长期结果来验证。鉴于新数据层出不穷,专家们对最佳治疗方法的意见也不尽相同,我们在这篇综述中旨在总结目前关于急性 TBAD 不同治疗策略结果的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting. Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1