Enhancing interprofessional practice through the co-design of a holistic culturally and developmentally informed First Nations child health assessment.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian journal of primary health Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1071/PY21293
Natasha Reid, Wei Liu, Shirley Morrissey, Marjad Page, Theresa McDonald, Erinn Hawkins, Andrew Wood, Michelle Parker-Tomlin, Grace Myatt, Heidi Webster, Bridget Greathead, Doug Shelton, Sarah Horton, Mary Katsikitis, Dianne Shanley
{"title":"Enhancing interprofessional practice through the co-design of a holistic culturally and developmentally informed First Nations child health assessment.","authors":"Natasha Reid,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Shirley Morrissey,&nbsp;Marjad Page,&nbsp;Theresa McDonald,&nbsp;Erinn Hawkins,&nbsp;Andrew Wood,&nbsp;Michelle Parker-Tomlin,&nbsp;Grace Myatt,&nbsp;Heidi Webster,&nbsp;Bridget Greathead,&nbsp;Doug Shelton,&nbsp;Sarah Horton,&nbsp;Mary Katsikitis,&nbsp;Dianne Shanley","doi":"10.1071/PY21293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This qualitative study explored staff experiences of co-designing and implementing a novel interprofessional (IP) First Nations child health assessment (the helpful check), developed in partnership with a remote North-Queensland Aboriginal CommunityControlled Health Organisation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eleven staff across two teams (family health and allied health) were involved in co-designing and implementing the child health assessment and associated IP practices. Interviews were undertaken using a semi-structured interview template and were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes were developed: (1) connect teams by building strong relationships; (2) leave space for helpful check processes to evolve; and (3) integrate helpful check processes into routine practice to sustain change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate how the incorporation of IP practices into a remote primary healthcare setting led to perceived benefits for both the health service staff and clients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY21293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This qualitative study explored staff experiences of co-designing and implementing a novel interprofessional (IP) First Nations child health assessment (the helpful check), developed in partnership with a remote North-Queensland Aboriginal CommunityControlled Health Organisation.

Method: Eleven staff across two teams (family health and allied health) were involved in co-designing and implementing the child health assessment and associated IP practices. Interviews were undertaken using a semi-structured interview template and were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three overarching themes were developed: (1) connect teams by building strong relationships; (2) leave space for helpful check processes to evolve; and (3) integrate helpful check processes into routine practice to sustain change.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate how the incorporation of IP practices into a remote primary healthcare setting led to perceived benefits for both the health service staff and clients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过共同设计综合文化和发展情况的第一民族儿童健康评估,加强专业间的实践。
背景:本定性研究探讨了工作人员共同设计和实施一种新的跨专业(IP)第一民族儿童健康评估(有益检查)的经验,该评估是与偏远的北昆士兰土著社区控制的卫生组织合作开发的。方法:来自两个小组(家庭健康和联合健康)的11名工作人员参与了儿童健康评估和相关知识产权实践的共同设计和实施。访谈采用半结构化访谈模板,录音并逐字抄写。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:三个主要主题:(1)通过建立牢固的关系来连接团队;(2)为有益的检查过程的演变留下空间;(3)将有用的检查过程整合到日常实践中,以维持变化。结论:结果表明,将知识产权实践纳入远程初级卫生保健环境如何为卫生服务人员和客户带来可感知的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
期刊最新文献
Australian healthcare professionals’ beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey General practice registrars’ practice in outer metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional comparison with rural and inner metropolitan areas Hepatitis C elimination: amplifying the role of primary care nurses in Australia Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference Older patients want to talk about sexual health in Australian primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1