Australian journal of primary health最新文献

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition, and sufferers present to healthcare professionals with variable complex symptoms and co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate the current beliefs and practice behaviours of healthcare professionals towards the management of CPP in Australian females.

We distributed an online survey to Australian healthcare professionals. Participants were questioned regarding their beliefs, the importance of various contributing factors and assessment variables, and their management preferences for two CPP vignettes. Demographic information and responses were analysed with descriptive statistics.

Complete data were obtained and analysed from 446 respondents including gynaecologists (n = 75), general practitioners (GPs) (n = 184) and physiotherapists (n = 187). Most of the respondents were female (88.1%), with male (11.7%) and other (0.2%) making up a smaller representation. Physiotherapists rated themselves higher in understanding mechanisms of CPP (64.7% very good to excellent) compared to gynaecologists (41.3%) and GPs (22.8%). Physiotherapists also reported higher levels of confidence in managing patients with CPP (57.8% quite or extremely confident) compared to 41.3% of gynaecologists and 22.3% of GPs who reported being quite or extremely confident. All three professions rated patient’s beliefs (89.8%), nervous system sensitisation (85.7%), stress/anxiety/depression (91.9%), fear avoidance (83.3%), history of sexual/emotional/physical abuse (94.1%) and pelvic floor muscle function (85.0%) as very/extremely important factors in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Most gynaecologists (71.0%) and GPs (70.2%) always referred for pelvic ultrasound during assessment. Physiotherapists assessed goal setting (88.8%) and screened for patients’ beliefs (80.9%) more often than gynaecologists (30.4% and 39.1% respectively) and GPs (46.5% and 29.0% respectively).

All three groups of healthcare professionals demonstrated a good understanding of pain mechanisms and incorporated a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to management of females with chronic pelvic pain. However, both gynaecologists and GPs were less confident in their understanding of and management of CPP, and less likely to consider patient beliefs and goals. The findings of this online survey may assist in the provision of more targeted education to further improve management of this condition.

General practice training in outer metropolitan (OM) areas contributes to patients’ access to care. Differences in clinical practice and training in rural versus urban areas have been established, but less is known about OM versus inner metropolitan (IM) differences – whether they offer a trainee learning experience of populations with distinct demographics and healthcare characteristics. This study sought to identify the characteristics and associations of general practice training in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory OM areas, compared to IM and rural areas.

Cross-sectional analyses of data (2016–2020) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, an ongoing cohort study of Australian GP registrars’ in-consultation clinical and educational experience and behaviours, were performed. Multinomial logistic regression assessed associations of rural/OM/IM practice location with registrar and practice factors, patient factors, consultation content factors and consultation action factors.

Overall, 1308 registrars provided data from 177,026 consultations. For several variables, there was a pattern in the differences of associations across rural/OM/IM areas. Experience of care of older patients and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health were more likely in OM than IM areas. Care of patients from non-English speaking background was more likely in OM than in rural areas. Possible markers of healthcare access (specialist referrals, and pathology and imaging requests) were less likely in OM than in both IM and rural areas.

OM areas are distinct (and educationally rich) clinical learning environments, with distinct demographic characteristics and seeming healthcare access limitations. This finding has implications for workforce support and health resource allocation.

Australia’s commitment to eliminate hepatitis C by 2030 is underpinned by the mobilisation of the primary care sector. Primary care nurses are well placed to contribute to achieving elimination given their unique access to people with/at risk of hepatitis C and their person-centred approach to care delivery. This study examines the enablers to primary care nurse involvement in elimination efforts.

Primary care nurses involved in the care of people with/at risk of hepatitis C were recruited through two national nursing organisations. Participants provided verbal consent to participate in an electronically recorded, semi-structured interview. Interview data were transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using a thematic analysis.

Sixteen interviews were conducted with nurses working in general practice, community health, alcohol and other drug services, and custodial settings, with the findings framed using a social-ecological model. The study identified individual attributes, such as empathy and advocacy for clients deemed ‘too hard for everyone else’. Interpersonal enablers included participants’ ability to effectively communicate with clients and colleagues, and using trusted professional relationships to improve client access to care. Public policy that addressed community factors, including stigma and confidentiality, were seen as supportive.

This study identified the critical and varied role primary care nurses play in hepatitis C elimination. Effective scale up of hepatitis C care involves recognising the pivotal role of primary care nurses, which will help to create an enabling environment that supports nurses to work to their full scope of practice and enhance their contribution to the elimination response.

Striving for health equity through research and education

15–16 August 2024, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, Sydney, Australia

The Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) held its Annual Research Conference from 15 to 16 August 2024 in Parramatta, Sydney, Australia. The Conference provided an important opportunity to: Showcase Australasia’s leading primary care research; Nurture research excellence; Promote multidisciplinary research networks and collaborations; Support the translation of evidence into policy and practice; Strengthen the impact of primary care research and Promote opportunities for networking. The Conference hosted almost 200 delegates from across Australia and New Zealand. We were also delighted to welcome colleagues from Asia, the UK and North America. In addition to engaging plenary presentations offered by the Honourable Mark Butler, Prof Rod McClure, Dr Elizabeth Deveny, A/Prof Mellissa Kang, Dr Summer Finlay and Prof Sue Crengle, the Conference hosted four workshops for academics at all stages of their careers. Delegates enjoyed 80 oral, 48 poster and 4 workshop presentations as well as some amazing presentations from international award winners.

To cite the full set of abstracts: (2024) Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference. Australian Journal of Primary Health 30, PYv30n4abs. doi:10.1071/PYv30n4abs

To cite individual abstracts use the following format: Assifi A et al. (2024) 2. Supporting community pharmacists’ in delivering contraceptive counselling: the ALLIANCE co-design workshop with consumers and community pharmacists transmitted infections (STIs) [Conference abstract]. Australian Journal of Primary Health 30, PYv30n4abs.

Maintaining sexual health and function is important to many older adults. Although older patients are regular users of primary care, opportunities to address sexual health concerns are missed. Building on interview studies, this research aimed to collect a larger number of older adults’ perspectives to deepen understanding of sexual healthcare needs and formulate recommendations for the Australian primary care context.

As part of the SHAPE2 Survey of older adults’ sexual health information-seeking behaviours, participants (aged ≥60 years and living in Australia) were asked what sexual health issues were most important to them, and the barriers they experienced in managing their sexual health. Data were collected in 2021 in the form of free-text comments. The sub-set of comments that related to healthcare experiences were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Out of 1470 survey participants, 864 responded to the relevant questions, and of these 107 wrote about healthcare experiences. Some comments described positive experiences seeking sexual health care; however, the majority outlined barriers to accessing support. Barriers were categorised into seven categories: patient embarrassment, barriers to rapport, uncertainty about finding solutions, ageism, barriers unique to minorities, needing general practitioners to initiate conversations and structural barriers.

Older patients want general practitioners to initiate sexual health conversations as part of routine care, and, crucially, sexual issues raised by the patient should be legitimised and treated with due attention. Although challenges, such as time, embarrassment and pressing health concerns, may hamper sexual health discussions, it is important that this area of holistic care is given more attention.

Background: Few general practitioners (GPs) pursue a career in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. This research examined factors motivating Australian General Practice Training Program (AGPT) graduates to remain in, or leave, Aboriginal Medical Services (AMSs).

Methods: AGPT graduates who remained (n =11) and left (n =9) AMSs after placements participated in semi-structured interviews across two studies. Thematic analysis informed by grounded theory was employed.

Results: Both participant groups highlighted similar motivations for requesting an AMS placement, particularly their interest in Aboriginal health or culture. Participants enjoyed organisational structures and relationships, and faced similar barriers to working in AMSs. Those who left placed greater emphasis on the politics and bureaucracy, and unpredictability, and also faced the barrier of ties to their current practice. Those who remained in Aboriginal health more proactively addressed barriers and had a more external view of barriers.

Conclusions: Factors influencing career decisions of GPs in Aboriginal health overlap with those for GPs in rural and other under-served areas. Training providers can better prepare (e.g. more comprehensive orientations) and support registrars during their placements (e.g. greater mentoring). Registrars' perceptions of, and reactions to, barriers may be pivotal in determining whether they remain in Aboriginal health. This article provides guidance for training providers to better support AMS registrars and encourage more GPs to work in this sector.

Background: Lesbian, bisexual+ and queer (LBQ+) cisgender women have considerable unmet mental health needs. The aims of this study were to examine LBQ+ cisgender women's prior engagement with general practitioners (GPs), and how this relationship shaped their mental health service use.

Method: Data from 2707 cisgender LBQ+ women were drawn from a national survey of adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer or questioning, asexual and other diverse sexuality and gender identities (LGBTIQA+) in Australia. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined demographic predictors of continuity of care with GPs and GPs' awareness of LBQ+ women's sexual orientation. The relationship between these variables and recent mental health service use was then analysed, comparing LBQ+ women's engagement with services known to be LGBTIQA+ inclusive and those without an inclusive reputation.

Results: LBQ+ cisgender women with a regular GP had greater odds of having accessed mental health services in the last 12months. Two-thirds had a regular GP, with the lowest odds among women aged 18-35years and highest odds among women with a disability. LBQ+ women who did not believe their regular GP knew of their sexuality had lower odds of having accessed LGBTIQA+ inclusive mental health services. These individuals were typically aged below 25years, bisexual+ or queer identified, had below undergraduate-level education, earned <$2000 AUD per week, or lived in an outer-suburban or regional area.

Conclusion: GPs may be missing opportunities to promote continuity of care through developing trusting relationships with specific sub-populations of LBQ+ women, which in turn appears to sustain inequitable access to mental health care. To offer appropriate care and referrals for this population, GPs should provide safe and inclusive environments to enable comfortable and supportive discussions about sexual orientation when this is relevant to a person's health care.

Background: The Partners in Recovery (PIR) program was implemented by the Australian Government Department of Health. Its overriding aim was to improve the coordination of services for people with severe and persistent mental illness, and who have complex needs that are not being met. The PIR capacity-building project (CBP) was funded to provide capacity building activities to the nationwide network of consortia that were set up in 2013 to deliver PIR over a 3-year period. The purpose of this paper is to describe the design and findings from an evaluation of the PIR CBP.

Methods: The evaluation involved collecting feedback from consenting PIR staff via an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. CBP activities included: state and national meetings; a web portal; teleconferences; webinars; a support facilitator mentor program; and tailored support from the CBP team.

Results: The CBP made a positive contribution to the implementation and delivery of PIR. Staff highly valued activities that employed face-to-face interaction or provided informative knowledge exchange, and were appreciative of CBP staff being responsive and adaptable to their needs.

Conclusions: From this evaluation, we recommend the following: identify relevant functions (e.g. prioritise networking), select the right mode of delivery (e.g. establish an online presence) and abide by key principles (e.g. be responsive to staff needs). This information is informing the mental health workforce capacity building activities that our team is currently undertaking.

Background: Aboriginal culture stands as the oldest continuous culture in the world. It gives paramount importance to a harmonious balance between personal connections to the body, spirit, and mind, as well as collective relationships with family, land, and community, integral to the wellbeing of Aboriginal people. However, obstacles can emerge for patients due to language barriers, cultural differences, or a historical lack of trust in the healthcare system. The establishment of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) has undoubtedly improved the healthcare experience for Aboriginal patients, yet there is limited research on the specific approaches utilised by general practitioners (GPs) working in these clinics.

Methods: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with two groups of GPs working in Aboriginal health. Each GP was presented with three scenarios and asked questions related to each scenario. Braun and Clarke's method of thematic analysis was applied to transcribed interviews.

Results: Patient-doctor relationship, health literacy, and engagement with the health system emerged as key factors influencing communication with Aboriginal patients. Experienced GPs, despite differing clinical backgrounds, shared concise yet similar ideas to their less experienced counterparts. Notably, experienced GPs prioritised non-medical conversations and mindful body language, emphasising the importance of building strong patient relationships over other consultation aspects.

Conclusions: This research provides initial insights for GPs in Aboriginal health, comparing experienced GPs with more than 10years experience to novices. However, further research involving Aboriginal patients is needed to validate GP strategies and understand their significance from the patients' perspective.

Malnutrition and frailty affect up to one-third of community-dwelling older adults in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), burdening individuals, health systems and the economy. As these conditions are often under-recognised and untreated in the community, there is an urgent need for healthcare professionals (HCPs) from all disciplines to be able to identify and manage malnutrition and frailty in this setting. This paper describes the systematic and iterative process by which a practical guide for identifying and managing malnutrition and frailty in the community, tailored to the ANZ context, was developed. The development of the guide was underpinned by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and included the following research activities: (1) a comprehensive literature review; (2) a survey of ANZ dietitians' current practices and perceptions around malnutrition and frailty; (3) interviews with ANZ dietitians; and (4) a multidisciplinary expert panel. This resulted in the development of a guide tailored to the ANZ context that provides recommendations around how to identify and manage malnutrition and frailty in the community. It is now freely available online and can be used by all HCPs across several settings. The approach used to develop this guide might be applicable to other conditions or settings, and our description of the process might be informative to others who are developing such tools to guide practice in their healthcare environment.