Surgical management of gastroschisis with the use of primary and staged closure based on the department's 20-year experience.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.2122
Patrycja Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz, Ewa Bućko, Dominika Skinder, Przemysław Mańkowski
{"title":"Surgical management of gastroschisis with the use of primary and staged closure based on the department&apos;s 20-year experience.","authors":"Patrycja Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz,&nbsp;Ewa Bućko,&nbsp;Dominika Skinder,&nbsp;Przemysław Mańkowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstractbackground: </strong>Gastroschisis is a common developmental anomaly of the abdominal front wall. The aim of surgical management is to restore the integrity of the abdominal wall and to insert the bowel into the abdominal cavity with the use of the primary or staged closure technique.The objective of this paper is to analyze our 20-year experience with surgical treatment of gastroschisis with primary and staged closure, to compare the postoperative course for the said techniques as well as to identify factors influencing the course and early results of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research materials consist of a retrospective analysis of medical history of patients treated at the Pediatric Surgery Clinic in Poznan over 20 years period from 2000 to 2019. 59 patients were operated on: 30 girls and 29 boys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical treatment was performed in all the cases. Primary closure was performed in 32% of the cases, whereas staged silo closure was performed in 68% of the cases. Postoperative analgosedation was used for 6 days on average after primary closures, and 13 days on average after staged closures. Generalized bacterial infection was present in 21% of patients treated with primary closures and 37% for staged closures. Infants treated with staged closure began enteral feeding considerably later (day 22) than those treated with primary closure (day 12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is not possible to indicate clearly which surgical technique is superior to the other based on the results obtained. When choosing the treatment method, the patient&apos;s clinical condition, associated anomalies, and the medical team&apos;s experience must be taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstractbackground: Gastroschisis is a common developmental anomaly of the abdominal front wall. The aim of surgical management is to restore the integrity of the abdominal wall and to insert the bowel into the abdominal cavity with the use of the primary or staged closure technique.The objective of this paper is to analyze our 20-year experience with surgical treatment of gastroschisis with primary and staged closure, to compare the postoperative course for the said techniques as well as to identify factors influencing the course and early results of treatment.

Methods: The research materials consist of a retrospective analysis of medical history of patients treated at the Pediatric Surgery Clinic in Poznan over 20 years period from 2000 to 2019. 59 patients were operated on: 30 girls and 29 boys.

Results: Surgical treatment was performed in all the cases. Primary closure was performed in 32% of the cases, whereas staged silo closure was performed in 68% of the cases. Postoperative analgosedation was used for 6 days on average after primary closures, and 13 days on average after staged closures. Generalized bacterial infection was present in 21% of patients treated with primary closures and 37% for staged closures. Infants treated with staged closure began enteral feeding considerably later (day 22) than those treated with primary closure (day 12).

Conclusions: It is not possible to indicate clearly which surgical technique is superior to the other based on the results obtained. When choosing the treatment method, the patient's clinical condition, associated anomalies, and the medical team's experience must be taken into consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据该科20年的经验,采用初级和分阶段封闭术治疗胃裂。
摘要背景:腹裂是一种常见的腹前壁发育异常。手术治疗的目的是恢复腹壁的完整性,并使用初级或分阶段闭合技术将肠插入腹腔。本文的目的是分析我们20年来手术治疗胃裂的初步和分期关闭的经验,比较上述技术的术后过程,并确定影响过程和早期治疗结果的因素。方法:回顾性分析2000 - 2019年20年间在波兹南儿科外科诊所就诊的患者的病史。手术59例:女孩30例,男孩29例。结果:所有病例均行手术治疗。32%的病例进行了初级封闭,68%的病例进行了分阶段封闭。初次闭合后平均使用6天,分期闭合后平均使用13天。21%的初次闭合患者出现全身性细菌感染,37%的分期闭合患者出现全身性细菌感染。分阶段封闭治疗的婴儿开始肠内喂养的时间(第22天)明显晚于初级封闭治疗的婴儿(第12天)。结论:根据所获得的结果,不可能明确指出哪种手术技术优于另一种手术技术。在选择治疗方法时,必须综合考虑患者的临床情况、相关的异常情况以及医疗团队的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser The impact of adipose fat tissue on pathogenesis of crypto-glandular anal fistula Assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of interactive telemedicine classes in surgery – survey of polish medical students The intraoperative application of indocyanine green (ICG), in breast reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi flap, as a preventive factor for tissue ischemia and postoperative complications Analysis of risk factor for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1