Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845
Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Adam Durczyński, Piotr Hogendorf, Janusz Strzelczyk
{"title":"Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience.","authors":"Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Adam Durczyński, Piotr Hogendorf, Janusz Strzelczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionEndoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant and early neoplastic tumours of esophageus, stomach and intestine in selected group of patients.AimAim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0) and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Material and methodsThe data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 was collected and analysed retrospectively. Results42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years old (ranging 31 – 89 yo) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25 – 185 minutes). Tumours were located in oesophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%) and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%) - 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment Average size of dissection lesions was 26 x 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 x 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma) and smallest one was 5 x 5 mm (GNET). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%) – 9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hamorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). ConclusionsWith proper qualification, ESD is effective and safe method of treatment for benign, premalignant and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in hands of experienced endoscopists. Following current guidelines satisfying outcomes, comparable with leading center, can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionEndoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant and early neoplastic tumours of esophageus, stomach and intestine in selected group of patients.AimAim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0) and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Material and methodsThe data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 was collected and analysed retrospectively. Results42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years old (ranging 31 – 89 yo) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25 – 185 minutes). Tumours were located in oesophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%) and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%) - 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment Average size of dissection lesions was 26 x 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 x 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma) and smallest one was 5 x 5 mm (GNET). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%) – 9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hamorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). ConclusionsWith proper qualification, ESD is effective and safe method of treatment for benign, premalignant and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in hands of experienced endoscopists. Following current guidelines satisfying outcomes, comparable with leading center, can be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)在胃肠道病变治疗中的应用-单中心经验。
内镜下胃肠道病变切除术起源于日本,在欧洲国家越来越常用。内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)确保了选定患者组的食管、胃和肠良性、癌前和早期肿瘤的微创切除。本研究的目的是了解我科ESD手术的预后、根治率(R0)和并发症发生率。材料与方法回顾性分析我院自2020年1月2日至2023年6月30日收治的100例食管、胃、十二指肠和结直肠病变ESD手术资料。结果男性42例,女性58例,中位年龄64岁,年龄31 ~ 89岁。手术平均持续时间为66分钟(25 - 185分钟)。肿瘤位于食道8例(8%),胃25例(25%),十二指肠1例(1%),结肠66例(66%)。98例(98%)成功根治性切除,2例符合手术条件,解剖病变平均大小为26 × 19 mm。最大的为60 × 60mm(乙状结肠腺瘤),最小的为5 × 5mm (GNET)。10例(10%)患者出现并发症,其中9例(9%)出现肠壁穿孔,1例(1%)出现出血,需要内镜干预。结论在经验丰富的内镜医师的指导下,ESD是一种安全有效的治疗胃肠道良性、癌前及早期肿瘤病变的方法。按照目前的指导方针,可以获得与指导中心相当的满意结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser The impact of adipose fat tissue on pathogenesis of crypto-glandular anal fistula Assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of interactive telemedicine classes in surgery – survey of polish medical students The intraoperative application of indocyanine green (ICG), in breast reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi flap, as a preventive factor for tissue ischemia and postoperative complications Analysis of risk factor for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1