Letter to editor: Academic journals should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in papers.

IF 2.8 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2180359

Gengyan Tang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter to the editor argues that if academic journals are willing to accept papers that include NLP-generated content under certain conditions, editorial policies should clarify the proportion of NLP-generated content in the paper. Excessive use of NLP-generated content should be considered as academic misconduct.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

致编辑的信：学术期刊应明确论文中NLP生成内容的比例。

这封致编辑的信认为，如果学术期刊愿意在一定条件下接受包含NLP生成内容的论文，那么编辑政策就应该明确NLP生成内容在论文中所占的比例。过度使用NLP生成的内容应被视为学术不端行为。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.