Clinical characteristics of acute rhinosinusitis in COVID-19 a post hoc analysis of a longitudinal study.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Polish Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.1076
Zuzanna Steć, Zofia Burska, Eliza Brożek-Mądry, Marcin Straburzyński, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Antoni Krzeski
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of acute rhinosinusitis in COVID-19 a post hoc analysis of a longitudinal study.","authors":"Zuzanna Steć,&nbsp;Zofia Burska,&nbsp;Eliza Brożek-Mądry,&nbsp;Marcin Straburzyński,&nbsp;Marta Waliszewska-Prosół,&nbsp;Antoni Krzeski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is a common and well-defined disorder, primarily of viral aetiology, with rhinovirus and coronavirus accounting for more than 50% of viral ARS. The fight with COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increased availability viral testing, which in turn allowed testing for presence of SARS-Cov-2 in all patients presenting common cold (or ARS) symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics of acute rhinosinusitis in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methodology/principal: </strong>This study is a post-hoc analysis. Patients symptoms were evaluated using a structured questionnaire twice: directly after a positive SARS-Cov-2 result and 7-12 days following the first evaluation. Subjects were asked about presence of nasal and systemic symptoms as well as headache.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 130 COVID-19 symptomatic patients were recruited into the study, 58 (45%) patients met EPOS2020 diagnostic criteria for ARS. Of all ARS patients, 72% presented with rhinorrhoea, 69% with pain perceived over paranasal sinuses, 62% with nasal congestion, 52% with cough, 45% with olfactory dysfunction, 38% with fever, 33% with facial pressure and in 22% pain was exacerbated by sinus palpation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Half of COVID-19 subjects has ARS. The course of SARS-Cov-2 ARS does not seem to differ significantly from ARS of other aetiologies. Since ARS in the course of COVID-19 seems to meet the definition of ARS proposed by EPOS 2020, we hypothesize that substances validated for ARS treatment, such as intranasal corticosteroids could be effective in SARS-Cov-2 ARS.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"77 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is a common and well-defined disorder, primarily of viral aetiology, with rhinovirus and coronavirus accounting for more than 50% of viral ARS. The fight with COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increased availability viral testing, which in turn allowed testing for presence of SARS-Cov-2 in all patients presenting common cold (or ARS) symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics of acute rhinosinusitis in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

Methodology/principal: This study is a post-hoc analysis. Patients symptoms were evaluated using a structured questionnaire twice: directly after a positive SARS-Cov-2 result and 7-12 days following the first evaluation. Subjects were asked about presence of nasal and systemic symptoms as well as headache.

Results: A total of 130 COVID-19 symptomatic patients were recruited into the study, 58 (45%) patients met EPOS2020 diagnostic criteria for ARS. Of all ARS patients, 72% presented with rhinorrhoea, 69% with pain perceived over paranasal sinuses, 62% with nasal congestion, 52% with cough, 45% with olfactory dysfunction, 38% with fever, 33% with facial pressure and in 22% pain was exacerbated by sinus palpation.

Conclusions: Half of COVID-19 subjects has ARS. The course of SARS-Cov-2 ARS does not seem to differ significantly from ARS of other aetiologies. Since ARS in the course of COVID-19 seems to meet the definition of ARS proposed by EPOS 2020, we hypothesize that substances validated for ARS treatment, such as intranasal corticosteroids could be effective in SARS-Cov-2 ARS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19患者急性鼻窦炎的临床特征:一项纵向研究的事后分析
背景:急性鼻窦炎(Acute rhinosinusitis, ARS)是一种常见且定义明确的疾病,主要由病毒病因引起,鼻病毒和冠状病毒占病毒性ARS的50%以上。与COVID-19大流行的斗争导致病毒检测的可用性增加,从而可以在所有出现普通感冒(或ARS)症状的患者中检测SARS-Cov-2的存在。本研究的目的是评估诊断为COVID-19的患者急性鼻窦炎的临床特征。方法/主要内容:本研究为事后分析。使用结构化问卷对患者的症状进行两次评估:在SARS-Cov-2阳性结果后直接进行评估,以及在第一次评估后7-12天进行评估。受试者被问及是否出现鼻腔和全身症状以及头痛。结果:共有130例COVID-19症状患者纳入研究,58例(45%)患者符合EPOS2020诊断标准。在所有ARS患者中,72%表现为鼻流,69%表现为鼻窦疼痛,62%表现为鼻塞,52%表现为咳嗽,45%表现为嗅觉功能障碍,38%表现为发烧,33%表现为面部压力,22%的患者因鼻窦触诊而加重疼痛。结论:一半的COVID-19患者有急性呼吸道综合征。SARS-Cov-2急性呼吸道综合征的病程似乎与其他病因的急性呼吸道综合征没有显著差异。由于COVID-19过程中的ARS似乎符合epos2020提出的ARS定义,我们假设经验证可用于ARS治疗的物质,如鼻内皮质类固醇,可能对SARS-Cov-2 ARS有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The impact of using FM systems on phonemic awareness in children with central auditory processing disorders (APD). A rapid parallel increase in the incidence and mortality of head and neck cancer among the Polish elderly over the last two decades and upward trends until 2035. Comparison Of Surgical Techniques Used In Post-Traumatic And Non-Traumatic Rhinoseptoplasty. Hyper eosinophilic diseases - diagnosis and therapeutic approach - practical position of the Polish working group. Patient Satisfaction after Open Rhinoseptoplasty: What Do the Statistics Say?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1