Racial and ethnic diversity of US participants in clinical trials for acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis: a comprehensive review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Dermatological Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09546634.2022.2114783
Anjana Sevagamoorthy, Patrick Sockler, Christine Akoh, Junko Takeshita
{"title":"Racial and ethnic diversity of US participants in clinical trials for acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis: a comprehensive review.","authors":"Anjana Sevagamoorthy,&nbsp;Patrick Sockler,&nbsp;Christine Akoh,&nbsp;Junko Takeshita","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2022.2114783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An increasing body of literature describes underreporting of race and ethnicity, and overrepresentation of White individuals in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic diversity of US participants in clinical trials for acne, atopic dermatitis (AD), and psoriasis. We performed a comprehensive review of clinical trials for these common dermatologic diseases that were published between January 2014 and July 2019. Race and ethnicity reporting among all trials, and the racial and ethnic distribution of US participants were compared by skin disease, intervention type, and trial phase. In total, 103 articles representing 119 unique trials were evaluated. Race and ethnicity were reported in only 22.7% of trials. The proportion of White participants (77.5%) was higher than that of the US population (72.5%, <i>p</i> < .01); a finding largely driven by psoriasis trials (84.7% White). The proportions of non-White and Hispanic individuals in non-topical (21.0 and 16.3%, respectively) and Phase III (20.5 and 18.7%, respectively) trials were lower than those in topical (23.5 and 23.3%, respectively; <i>p</i> < .01) and Phase I/II trials (25.6 and 22.3%, respectively; <i>p</i> < .01). Race and ethnicity remain underreported in dermatologic clinical trials, and US trial participant diversity differs by skin disease, intervention type, and trial phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":15639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","volume":"33 8","pages":"3086-3097"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatological Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2114783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

An increasing body of literature describes underreporting of race and ethnicity, and overrepresentation of White individuals in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the racial and ethnic diversity of US participants in clinical trials for acne, atopic dermatitis (AD), and psoriasis. We performed a comprehensive review of clinical trials for these common dermatologic diseases that were published between January 2014 and July 2019. Race and ethnicity reporting among all trials, and the racial and ethnic distribution of US participants were compared by skin disease, intervention type, and trial phase. In total, 103 articles representing 119 unique trials were evaluated. Race and ethnicity were reported in only 22.7% of trials. The proportion of White participants (77.5%) was higher than that of the US population (72.5%, p < .01); a finding largely driven by psoriasis trials (84.7% White). The proportions of non-White and Hispanic individuals in non-topical (21.0 and 16.3%, respectively) and Phase III (20.5 and 18.7%, respectively) trials were lower than those in topical (23.5 and 23.3%, respectively; p < .01) and Phase I/II trials (25.6 and 22.3%, respectively; p < .01). Race and ethnicity remain underreported in dermatologic clinical trials, and US trial participant diversity differs by skin disease, intervention type, and trial phase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痤疮、特应性皮炎和牛皮癣临床试验中美国参与者的种族和民族多样性:一项全面的综述。
越来越多的文献描述了种族和民族的少报,以及临床试验中白人个体的过多代表。我们的目的是评估痤疮、特应性皮炎(AD)和牛皮癣临床试验中美国参与者的种族和民族多样性。我们对2014年1月至2019年7月期间发表的针对这些常见皮肤病的临床试验进行了全面回顾。所有试验的种族和民族报告,以及美国参与者的种族和民族分布按皮肤病、干预类型和试验阶段进行比较。总共评估了103篇代表119项独特试验的文章。只有22.7%的试验报告了种族和民族。白人参与者的比例(77.5%)高于美国人口的比例(72.5%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dermatological Treatment covers all aspects of the treatment of skin disease, including the use of topical and systematically administered drugs and other forms of therapy. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment is positioned to give dermatologists cutting edge information on new treatments in all areas of dermatology. It also publishes valuable clinical reviews and theoretical papers on dermatological treatments.
期刊最新文献
Boxed warnings for dermatologic JAK inhibitors: are they standardized worldwide? A review of biosimilars in psoriasis: impacts on efficacy, safety, access, and a first-hand look at biosimilar cost savings within the department of veterans affairs Postoperative risk assessment of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and the efficacy of delayed prevention following 532 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of solar lentigines: a randomized controlled study. Biodegradable polymers and platelet-rich plasma causing visual impairment: a literature review. Exploring the effect of deucravacitinib in patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1