Benefits of Information Technology in Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Personal Health Records.

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Healthcare Informatics Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.4258/hir.2023.29.4.323
Hyejung Chang, Jae-Young Choi, Jaesun Shim, Mihui Kim, Mona Choi
{"title":"Benefits of Information Technology in Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Personal Health Records.","authors":"Hyejung Chang, Jae-Young Choi, Jaesun Shim, Mihui Kim, Mona Choi","doi":"10.4258/hir.2023.29.4.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systematic evaluations of the benefits of health information technology (HIT) play an essential role in enhancing healthcare quality by improving outcomes. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the benefits of IT adoption in healthcare settings. This study aimed to review the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), the internet of things (IoT), and personal health records (PHR), based on scientific evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature published in peer-reviewed journals between 2016 and 2022 was searched for systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Manual searches were also performed using the reference lists of systematic reviews and eligible studies from major health informatics journals. The benefits of each HIT were assessed from multiple perspectives across four outcome domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four systematic review or meta-analysis studies on AI, IoT, and PHR were identified. The benefits of each HIT were assessed and summarized from a multifaceted perspective, focusing on four outcome domains: clinical, psycho-behavioral, managerial, and socioeconomic. The benefits varied depending on the nature of each type of HIT and the diseases to which they were applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, our review indicates that AI and PHR can positively impact clinical outcomes, while IoT holds potential for improving managerial efficiency. Despite ongoing research into the benefits of health IT in line with advances in healthcare, the existing evidence is limited in both volume and scope. The findings of our study can help identify areas for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10651408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2023.29.4.323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Systematic evaluations of the benefits of health information technology (HIT) play an essential role in enhancing healthcare quality by improving outcomes. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the benefits of IT adoption in healthcare settings. This study aimed to review the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI), the internet of things (IoT), and personal health records (PHR), based on scientific evidence.

Methods: The literature published in peer-reviewed journals between 2016 and 2022 was searched for systematic reviews and meta-analysis studies using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Manual searches were also performed using the reference lists of systematic reviews and eligible studies from major health informatics journals. The benefits of each HIT were assessed from multiple perspectives across four outcome domains.

Results: Twenty-four systematic review or meta-analysis studies on AI, IoT, and PHR were identified. The benefits of each HIT were assessed and summarized from a multifaceted perspective, focusing on four outcome domains: clinical, psycho-behavioral, managerial, and socioeconomic. The benefits varied depending on the nature of each type of HIT and the diseases to which they were applied.

Conclusions: Overall, our review indicates that AI and PHR can positively impact clinical outcomes, while IoT holds potential for improving managerial efficiency. Despite ongoing research into the benefits of health IT in line with advances in healthcare, the existing evidence is limited in both volume and scope. The findings of our study can help identify areas for further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息技术在医疗保健中的好处:人工智能、物联网和个人健康记录。
目的:系统评价卫生信息技术(HIT)的效益在通过改善结果来提高卫生保健质量方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,关于在医疗保健环境中采用IT的好处的经验证据有限。本研究旨在以科学证据为基础,回顾人工智能(AI)、物联网(IoT)和个人健康记录(PHR)的好处。方法:使用PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库检索2016年至2022年同行评议期刊上发表的文献,进行系统评价和荟萃分析研究。还使用来自主要卫生信息学期刊的系统评价和符合条件的研究的参考列表进行了人工检索。从四个结果领域的多个角度评估每个HIT的益处。结果:确定了24项关于人工智能、物联网和PHR的系统评价或荟萃分析研究。从多方面评估和总结了每个HIT的益处,重点关注四个结果领域:临床、心理行为、管理和社会经济。效益取决于每种HIT的性质和所应用的疾病。结论:总体而言,我们的综述表明人工智能和PHR可以对临床结果产生积极影响,而物联网具有提高管理效率的潜力。尽管随着医疗保健的发展,对医疗IT的好处进行了持续的研究,但现有的证据在数量和范围上都很有限。我们的研究结果可以帮助确定进一步调查的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Informatics Research
Healthcare Informatics Research MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Status and Trends of the Digital Healthcare Industry. Technology and Access to Healthcare with Different Scheduling Systems: A Scoping Review. Associations between Nicotine Dependence, Smartphone Usage Patterns, and Expected Compliance with a Smoking Cessation Application among Smokers. ChatGPT Predicts In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality for Sepsis: In-Context Learning with the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database. Data Market-related Issues in the Medical Field: Accelerating Digital Healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1