Appropriate usage of post-exposure prophylaxis-in-pocket for HIV prevention by individuals with low-frequency exposures.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1177/09564624231215151
Matthew Clifford Rashotte, Deborah Yoong, Mark Naccarato, Oscar J Pico Espinosa, Karla Fisher, Isaac I Bogoch, Darrell Hs Tan
{"title":"Appropriate usage of post-exposure prophylaxis-in-pocket for HIV prevention by individuals with low-frequency exposures.","authors":"Matthew Clifford Rashotte, Deborah Yoong, Mark Naccarato, Oscar J Pico Espinosa, Karla Fisher, Isaac I Bogoch, Darrell Hs Tan","doi":"10.1177/09564624231215151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PEP-In-Pocket (Post-Exposure Prophylaxis-In-Pocket, or \"PIP\") is a biobehavioural HIV prevention strategy wherein patients are proactively identified and given a prescription for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) medications to self-initiate in case of high-risk exposures. We evaluated this strategy in a prospective observational study at two hospital-based clinics in Toronto, Canada. HIV-negative adults using PIP underwent chart review and completed quarterly electronic questionnaires over 12 months. The primary objective was to quantify appropriate PIP initiation, defined as starting PIP within 72 h of a high-risk exposure. Secondary objectives were to quantify HIV seroconversions, changes in sexual risk behaviour, sexual satisfaction, and satisfaction with the PIP strategy. From 11/2017 to 02/2020, 43 participants enrolled and completed ≥1 questionnaire. PIP was self-initiated on 27 occasions by 15 participants, of which 24 uses (89%) were appropriate, 2 were unnecessary, and 1 was for an unknown exposure. Chart review identified no inappropriate non-use. Over 32 person-years of testing follow-up, we observed zero HIV seroconversions. Sexual risk declined modestly over follow-up, with a HIRI-MSM (HIV Incidence Risk Index for MSM) change of -0.39 (95% CI = -0.58, -0.21 per 3 months, <i>p</i> < .001). Sexual satisfaction was stable over time. At 12 months, 31 (72%) remained on PIP, 8 (19%) had transitioned to pre-exposure prophylaxis and 4 (9%) were lost-to-follow-up. Among participants who remained on PIP and completed questionnaires at 12 months, 24/25 (96%) strongly/somewhat agreed that PIP decreased their anxiety about contracting HIV and 25/25 (100%) strongly/somewhat agreed that they would recommend PIP to a friend. PIP is a feasible HIV prevention strategy in carefully selected individuals at modest HIV risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11047008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624231215151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PEP-In-Pocket (Post-Exposure Prophylaxis-In-Pocket, or "PIP") is a biobehavioural HIV prevention strategy wherein patients are proactively identified and given a prescription for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) medications to self-initiate in case of high-risk exposures. We evaluated this strategy in a prospective observational study at two hospital-based clinics in Toronto, Canada. HIV-negative adults using PIP underwent chart review and completed quarterly electronic questionnaires over 12 months. The primary objective was to quantify appropriate PIP initiation, defined as starting PIP within 72 h of a high-risk exposure. Secondary objectives were to quantify HIV seroconversions, changes in sexual risk behaviour, sexual satisfaction, and satisfaction with the PIP strategy. From 11/2017 to 02/2020, 43 participants enrolled and completed ≥1 questionnaire. PIP was self-initiated on 27 occasions by 15 participants, of which 24 uses (89%) were appropriate, 2 were unnecessary, and 1 was for an unknown exposure. Chart review identified no inappropriate non-use. Over 32 person-years of testing follow-up, we observed zero HIV seroconversions. Sexual risk declined modestly over follow-up, with a HIRI-MSM (HIV Incidence Risk Index for MSM) change of -0.39 (95% CI = -0.58, -0.21 per 3 months, p < .001). Sexual satisfaction was stable over time. At 12 months, 31 (72%) remained on PIP, 8 (19%) had transitioned to pre-exposure prophylaxis and 4 (9%) were lost-to-follow-up. Among participants who remained on PIP and completed questionnaires at 12 months, 24/25 (96%) strongly/somewhat agreed that PIP decreased their anxiety about contracting HIV and 25/25 (100%) strongly/somewhat agreed that they would recommend PIP to a friend. PIP is a feasible HIV prevention strategy in carefully selected individuals at modest HIV risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低频率接触者适当使用暴露后口袋预防方法预防艾滋病毒。
PEP- in - pocket(暴露后预防-口袋,或“PIP”)是一种生物行为艾滋病毒预防策略,其中患者被主动识别并给予艾滋病毒暴露后预防(PEP)药物处方,以便在高风险暴露的情况下自行启动。我们在加拿大多伦多两家医院诊所的前瞻性观察研究中评估了这一策略。使用PIP的hiv阴性成人在12个月内进行了图表审查并完成了季度电子问卷调查。主要目的是量化适当的PIP启动,定义为在高风险暴露后72小时内启动PIP。次要目标是量化艾滋病毒血清转化,性危险行为的变化,性满意度和对PIP策略的满意度。2017年11月至2020年2月,共纳入43名参与者,完成≥1份问卷。15名参与者27次自我启动PIP,其中24次(89%)使用是适当的,2次是不必要的,1次是未知的暴露。图表审查没有发现不适当的非使用。在32人年的检测随访中,我们观察到零HIV血清转化。性风险在随访期间略有下降,HIRI-MSM (MSM的HIV发病率风险指数)变化为-0.39 (95% CI = -0.58, -0.21 / 3个月,p < .001)。随着时间的推移,性满意度是稳定的。12个月时,31例(72%)仍在使用PIP, 8例(19%)已过渡到暴露前预防,4例(9%)失访。在继续使用PIP并在12个月后完成问卷的参与者中,24/25(96%)强烈/多少同意PIP减少了他们对感染艾滋病毒的焦虑,25/25(100%)强烈/多少同意他们会向朋友推荐PIP。PIP是一种可行的艾滋病毒预防策略,适用于精心挑选的艾滋病毒风险适中的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Assessing and improving the quality of guideline-adherent hepatitis B virus care in people with HIV: A cross-sectional study. Association between CD4 lymphocyte count and the incidence of comorbidities in Human immunodeficiency virus positive patients with virological suppression after antiretroviral treatment. Addressing stigma, enhancing social support and improving mental health among men who have sex with men in the Philippines. Case-control study on challenges in loss of follow-up care and the limitations in the reach of HIV policies for women. HIV and intersectional stigma among people living with HIV and healthcare workers and antiretroviral therapy adherence in the Dominican Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1