What Postoperative Nutritional Interventions Lead to Better Outcomes in Fragility Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593231155828
Jennifer S Oberstar, Caitlin J Bakker, Megan Sorich, Teresa McCarthy
{"title":"What Postoperative Nutritional Interventions Lead to Better Outcomes in Fragility Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jennifer S Oberstar,&nbsp;Caitlin J Bakker,&nbsp;Megan Sorich,&nbsp;Teresa McCarthy","doi":"10.1177/21514593231155828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fragility hip fracture patients are often malnourished. Nutrition supplementation may help, but it is unclear if supplementation is impactful when considering outcomes. A systematic review of literature examining perioperative nutrition status for older adults experiencing a hip fracture was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, CAB Abstracts and Embase (Ovid); Cochrane Library (Wiley); PubMed; Scopus; Global Index Medicus; Web of Science Core Collection; SPORTDiscus (EBSCO); and clinical trial registries ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from inception to April 2021, incorporating terminology related to nutritional interventions, fragility fractures, and postoperative outcomes. Two investigators reviewed citations for inclusion, extracted nutrition intervention criteria, and categorized hip fragility outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1792 citations, 90 articles underwent full-text screening, and 14 articles were included in the final sample. We identified nutritional interventions and 4 outcomes of interest. 8 studies (n = 649) demonstrated a mean difference of .78 days (CI .34-1.21) in length of stay (LOS) between the nutritional intervention and control groups. Rehabilitation ward stays were discussed in 2 studies demonstrating a non-statistically significant difference. 7 studies (n = 341) reported mortality rates; when pooled there was no statistically significant difference. 5 studies showed data for postoperative infections and 4 studies reported on postoperative urinary tract infections. Pooling of data found a statistically significant result (Relative Risk: .49 [.32, .75], P = .001) with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 27%). 4 studies reported urinary tract infections (n = 140) in the intervention group and (n = 121) in the control group with a non-statistically significant result. Grip strength was only reported in two studies but pooling of the data was non-statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlighted the lack of consensus regarding the type of nutrition interventions available and impact on outcomes of interest including mortality, length of stay, infections, and grip strength for fragility hip fractures in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"14 ","pages":"21514593231155828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/c1/10.1177_21514593231155828.PMC9936399.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231155828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fragility hip fracture patients are often malnourished. Nutrition supplementation may help, but it is unclear if supplementation is impactful when considering outcomes. A systematic review of literature examining perioperative nutrition status for older adults experiencing a hip fracture was performed.

Methods: We searched Medline, CAB Abstracts and Embase (Ovid); Cochrane Library (Wiley); PubMed; Scopus; Global Index Medicus; Web of Science Core Collection; SPORTDiscus (EBSCO); and clinical trial registries ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from inception to April 2021, incorporating terminology related to nutritional interventions, fragility fractures, and postoperative outcomes. Two investigators reviewed citations for inclusion, extracted nutrition intervention criteria, and categorized hip fragility outcomes.

Results: Of 1792 citations, 90 articles underwent full-text screening, and 14 articles were included in the final sample. We identified nutritional interventions and 4 outcomes of interest. 8 studies (n = 649) demonstrated a mean difference of .78 days (CI .34-1.21) in length of stay (LOS) between the nutritional intervention and control groups. Rehabilitation ward stays were discussed in 2 studies demonstrating a non-statistically significant difference. 7 studies (n = 341) reported mortality rates; when pooled there was no statistically significant difference. 5 studies showed data for postoperative infections and 4 studies reported on postoperative urinary tract infections. Pooling of data found a statistically significant result (Relative Risk: .49 [.32, .75], P = .001) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 27%). 4 studies reported urinary tract infections (n = 140) in the intervention group and (n = 121) in the control group with a non-statistically significant result. Grip strength was only reported in two studies but pooling of the data was non-statistically significant.

Conclusions: This systematic review highlighted the lack of consensus regarding the type of nutrition interventions available and impact on outcomes of interest including mortality, length of stay, infections, and grip strength for fragility hip fractures in older adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后哪些营养干预措施能改善脆性髋部骨折的预后?系统评价。
背景:脆性髋部骨折患者通常营养不良。营养补充可能有所帮助,但在考虑结果时,补充是否有影响尚不清楚。系统回顾了有关老年人髋部骨折围手术期营养状况的文献。方法:检索Medline、CAB Abstracts和Embase (Ovid);科克伦图书馆(Wiley);PubMed;斯高帕斯;全球索引Medicus;Web of Science核心馆藏;SPORTDiscus (EBSCO);临床试验登记处ClinicalTrials.gov和WHO ICTRP从成立到2021年4月,纳入与营养干预、脆弱性骨折和术后结果相关的术语。两名研究人员回顾了纳入的引用,提取了营养干预标准,并对髋关节易碎性结果进行了分类。结果:在1792篇引用中,90篇文章进行了全文筛选,14篇文章被纳入最终样本。我们确定了营养干预措施和4个感兴趣的结果。8项研究(n = 649)显示营养干预组与对照组的住院时间(LOS)平均差异为0.78天(CI .34-1.21)。2项研究讨论了康复病房住院时间,显示无统计学意义的差异。7项研究(n = 341)报告了死亡率;当合并时,没有统计学上的显著差异。5项研究报告了术后感染的数据,4项研究报告了术后尿路感染的数据。汇集数据发现具有统计学意义的结果(相对风险:0.49)。32, .75], P = .001),异质性较低(I2 = 27%)。干预组出现尿路感染4例(n = 140),对照组出现尿路感染121例(n = 121),结果无统计学意义。握力仅在两项研究中有报道,但数据汇总无统计学意义。结论:本系统综述强调了对老年人脆性髋部骨折的可用营养干预类型及其对相关结果的影响缺乏共识,包括死亡率、住院时间、感染和握力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Trunk Muscle Cross-Sectional Areas at Hip Fractures and Their Association With Recovery of Postoperative Gait Ability: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study. Pre-Operative Direct Oral Anticoagulant Level Measurement Reduces Time to Surgery in Hip Fracture Patients. Functional Outcomes After Nonoperative Management in Older Adult Low-Energy Stable and Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Review of 158 Patients. Early Full Weight-Bearing Exercises to Improve Gait Function in Older Adult Patients Following Surgery for Distal Femoral Fractures. Low Rate of Teriparatide Supplementation for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures in Elderly Females.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1