The effects of basic body awareness therapy on balance in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised crossover trial.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Somatosensory and Motor Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-23 DOI:10.1080/08990220.2023.2181327

Kamil Yilmaz, Fatma Gul Yazicioglu, Ozlem Akkoyun Sert, Burak Ozturk, Kadriye Armutlu, Hamiyet Yuce

{"title":"The effects of basic body awareness therapy on balance in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised crossover trial.","authors":"Kamil Yilmaz, Fatma Gul Yazicioglu, Ozlem Akkoyun Sert, Burak Ozturk, Kadriye Armutlu, Hamiyet Yuce","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2023.2181327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of basic body awareness therapy (BBAT) and conventional treatments (CT) on balance in patients with chronic neck pain.Methods: Thirty-five patients with neck pain participated in this randomised two-period crossover trial. Patients were divided into A (BBAT/CT) (n = 17) and B (CT/BBAT) (n = 18) groups. Group A received BBAT twice a week for 6 weeks, whereas Group B received CT within the same parameters. After a 5-week washout period, the treatments received by the groups were changed. The primary outcome was balance, assessed via the sensory organisation test (SOT) using the computerised dynamic posturography device. The secondary outcome was pain assessed by the visual analogue scale. Assessments were performed before and after primary and secondary treatments.Results: In Group A, the SOT conditions 4, 5, 6; composites score; and visual and vestibular system scores increased after BBAT; however, only condition five scores and vestibular system scores increased (p < .05) in Group B, which started with CT. Within the groups, both treatments were effective for easing pain (p < .05).Conclusions: Although patients who started the therapy with BBAT showed more improvement in balance, no differences were observed between the therapies.","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":" ","pages":"147-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2181327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of basic body awareness therapy (BBAT) and conventional treatments (CT) on balance in patients with chronic neck pain.

Methods: Thirty-five patients with neck pain participated in this randomised two-period crossover trial. Patients were divided into A (BBAT/CT) (n = 17) and B (CT/BBAT) (n = 18) groups. Group A received BBAT twice a week for 6 weeks, whereas Group B received CT within the same parameters. After a 5-week washout period, the treatments received by the groups were changed. The primary outcome was balance, assessed via the sensory organisation test (SOT) using the computerised dynamic posturography device. The secondary outcome was pain assessed by the visual analogue scale. Assessments were performed before and after primary and secondary treatments.

Results: In Group A, the SOT conditions 4, 5, 6; composites score; and visual and vestibular system scores increased after BBAT; however, only condition five scores and vestibular system scores increased (p < .05) in Group B, which started with CT. Within the groups, both treatments were effective for easing pain (p < .05).

Conclusions: Although patients who started the therapy with BBAT showed more improvement in balance, no differences were observed between the therapies.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

基本身体意识疗法对慢性颈部疼痛患者平衡的影响:一项随机交叉试验。

目的:比较基础身体意识疗法(BBAT)与常规疗法(CT)对慢性颈痛患者平衡能力的影响。方法:35例颈部疼痛患者参加了这项随机两期交叉试验。患者分为A (BBAT/CT)组(n = 17)和B (CT/BBAT)组(n = 18)。A组接受BBAT治疗，每周2次，连续6周;B组在相同参数下接受CT治疗。在5周的洗脱期后，各组接受的治疗改变。主要结果是平衡，通过使用计算机动态姿势记录设备的感觉组织测试(SOT)进行评估。次要终点是疼痛，用视觉模拟量表评估。在一次和二次治疗前后进行评估。结果:A组:SOT条件4、5、6;复合材料分数;BBAT后视觉和前庭系统评分升高;结论:虽然开始BBAT治疗的患者在平衡方面表现出更多的改善，但两种治疗之间没有观察到差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Somatosensory and Motor Research 医学-神经科学

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.