Coping profiles of family caregivers of people with schizophrenia: differentiations between parent and sibling caregivers.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-22 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2156986
Léa Plessis, Shyhrete Rexhaj, Philippe Golay, Hélène Wilquin
{"title":"Coping profiles of family caregivers of people with schizophrenia: differentiations between parent and sibling caregivers.","authors":"Léa Plessis, Shyhrete Rexhaj, Philippe Golay, Hélène Wilquin","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2156986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research on informal caregivers of people with schizophrenia (PWS) has primarily focused on parental caregivers. However, siblings also play an important role in the recovery process of PWS.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the coping profiles of family caregivers according to whether they are siblings or parents of the PWS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Parent and sibling caregivers (<i>N</i> = 181) completed the Family Coping Questionnaire (FCQ), which assessed their coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results reveal that parents and siblings do not use the same coping strategies and styles. Three coping profiles were identified depending on the caregiver's relationship with the PWS. Most parents displayed an undifferentiated profile (96.7%), while siblings were more heterogeneously distributed among the undifferentiated profile (58.3%), problem-focused profile (37.5%), and emotion and social support-focused profile (4.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the coping capacities of family caregivers to deal with the illness of their sibling or child with schizophrenia are diverse and that it is important to differentiate among them. This would enable these caregivers to benefit from support that could be tailored to their specific needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"244-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2156986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research on informal caregivers of people with schizophrenia (PWS) has primarily focused on parental caregivers. However, siblings also play an important role in the recovery process of PWS.

Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the coping profiles of family caregivers according to whether they are siblings or parents of the PWS.

Method: Parent and sibling caregivers (N = 181) completed the Family Coping Questionnaire (FCQ), which assessed their coping strategies.

Results: The results reveal that parents and siblings do not use the same coping strategies and styles. Three coping profiles were identified depending on the caregiver's relationship with the PWS. Most parents displayed an undifferentiated profile (96.7%), while siblings were more heterogeneously distributed among the undifferentiated profile (58.3%), problem-focused profile (37.5%), and emotion and social support-focused profile (4.2%).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the coping capacities of family caregivers to deal with the illness of their sibling or child with schizophrenia are diverse and that it is important to differentiate among them. This would enable these caregivers to benefit from support that could be tailored to their specific needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症患者家庭照顾者的应对概况:父母和兄弟姐妹照顾者之间的区别。
背景:之前对精神分裂症患者(PWS)非正式照顾者的研究主要集中在父母照顾者身上。目的:本研究旨在根据精神分裂症患者的兄弟姐妹或父母,比较家庭照顾者的应对情况:父母和兄弟姐妹照顾者(181 人)填写了家庭应对问卷(FCQ),以评估他们的应对策略:结果显示,父母和兄弟姐妹使用的应对策略和方式并不相同。根据照顾者与残疾人的关系,确定了三种应对方式。大多数父母表现出无差别的应对方式(96.7%),而兄弟姐妹在无差别应对方式(58.3%)、以问题为中心的应对方式(37.5%)以及以情感和社会支持为中心的应对方式(4.2%)之间的分布较为不均:这些研究结果表明,家庭照顾者应对其患有精神分裂症的兄弟姐妹或子女的疾病的能力是多种多样的,因此有必要对这些能力进行区分。这将使这些照顾者能够从针对其具体需求的支持中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Starting well, staying well: randomised controlled trial of "Whitu - seven ways in seven days," a well-being app for university students. Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder. Healthcare professional disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a rapid scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1