首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Mental Health最新文献

英文 中文
Supporting transitions: a scoping review of interventions for students with mental health conditions entering higher education. 支持过渡:对有心理健康问题的学生进入高等教育的干预措施的范围审查。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2026.2622084
Tara Jain, Debbie Yui Kiu Lo, Rebecca Upsher, Nicola Byrom

Background: Emerging adulthood is a peak period for mental health problems, and transition to university heightens both risks and opportunities. Targeted interventions may support students with pre-existing conditions, but the evidence base has not been systematically updated since 2021.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and ERIC (2015-2025) for peer-reviewed studies evaluating interventions supporting students with diagnosed or self-reported mental health conditions during transition to higher education. Eligible designs included quantitative pre-post and controlled studies. Data extraction followed the TIDieR checklist, and risk of bias was assessed using a modified NIH tool.

Results: Eight studies (five interventions) were identified. Four interventions used controlled designs, three were randomised controlled trials. Common components included peer mentorship, goal setting, psychoeducation, and skills for independence. Several targeted help-seeking barriers, empowerment, and loneliness. Interventions were generally acceptable, with evidence of improvements in educational outcomes, adjustment, and depressive symptoms, but not anxiety. Most were opt-in, reliant on disclosure, and none were university-led.

Conclusion: Targeted interventions show promise in supporting students with mental health conditions during university transition. However, evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, and predominantly North American. Larger, equity-focused, and university-led trials are urgently required.

背景:初成期是心理健康问题的高峰期,进入大学后风险和机会都增加了。有针对性的干预措施可能会支持已有疾病的学生,但自2021年以来,证据基础尚未系统更新。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase和ERIC(2015-2025),以获取同行评审的研究,这些研究评估了在向高等教育过渡期间为诊断或自述心理健康状况的学生提供支持的干预措施。符合条件的设计包括定量前后研究和对照研究。数据提取遵循TIDieR检查表,并使用改进的NIH工具评估偏倚风险。结果:确定了8项研究(5项干预措施)。4项干预采用对照设计,3项为随机对照试验。常见的组成部分包括同伴指导、目标设定、心理教育和独立技能。一些针对求助障碍、赋权和孤独。干预措施总体上是可接受的,有证据表明教育成果、适应能力和抑郁症状有所改善,但焦虑没有改善。大多数是自愿加入的,依赖于信息披露,没有一个是由大学主导的。结论:有针对性的干预措施在支持大学生转学期间的心理健康问题方面具有良好的效果。然而,证据仍然有限,异质性,主要是北美。迫切需要规模更大、以股权为中心、由大学主导的试验。
{"title":"Supporting transitions: a scoping review of interventions for students with mental health conditions entering higher education.","authors":"Tara Jain, Debbie Yui Kiu Lo, Rebecca Upsher, Nicola Byrom","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2622084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2622084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging adulthood is a peak period for mental health problems, and transition to university heightens both risks and opportunities. Targeted interventions may support students with pre-existing conditions, but the evidence base has not been systematically updated since 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and ERIC (2015-2025) for peer-reviewed studies evaluating interventions supporting students with diagnosed or self-reported mental health conditions during transition to higher education. Eligible designs included quantitative pre-post and controlled studies. Data extraction followed the TIDieR checklist, and risk of bias was assessed using a modified NIH tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (five interventions) were identified. Four interventions used controlled designs, three were randomised controlled trials. Common components included peer mentorship, goal setting, psychoeducation, and skills for independence. Several targeted help-seeking barriers, empowerment, and loneliness. Interventions were generally acceptable, with evidence of improvements in educational outcomes, adjustment, and depressive symptoms, but not anxiety. Most were opt-in, reliant on disclosure, and none were university-led.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted interventions show promise in supporting students with mental health conditions during university transition. However, evidence remains limited, heterogeneous, and predominantly North American. Larger, equity-focused, and university-led trials are urgently required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of initial depression and anxiety levels on symptom severity change during psychological treatment for common mental disorders: a systematic review. 在常见精神障碍的心理治疗过程中,初始抑郁和焦虑水平对症状严重程度变化的影响:一项系统综述。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2026.2622085
Anna Kamardina, Rob Saunders, Emma Broglia

Background: Depression and anxiety are highly comorbid conditions, which may impact treatment response.

Aims: We intended to examine how depression and anxiety symptoms change during psychological interventions for adults and how the initial severity is associated with distinct trajectory classes.

Methods: We identified papers examining longitudinal changes in depression and anxiety. Trajectory classes were grouped into responders, improvers and non-improvers. Narrative synthesis, alongside meta-analysis, was applied to explore the number and nature of classes, their associations with study characteristics and predictors of trajectory class membership. This study was pre-registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023393155), and the authors followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance.

Results: We identified 18 papers, including 22 models with two to six classes. Responding and non-improving classes prevailed. Meta-regression revealed no characteristics associated with the proportion of these classes. Initial depression and anxiety levels predicted trajectory class membership for each other, but not always non-response. Unemployment, suicidality, social functioning impairment, treatment type and medication use predicted following non-responding trajectory.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the complex relationship between initial anxiety and depression severity and their changes during psychological interventions. They provide practitioners with insights into factors associated with non-response patterns of symptom change.

背景:抑郁和焦虑是高度合并症,可能影响治疗效果。目的:我们旨在研究成人在心理干预期间抑郁和焦虑症状如何改变,以及初始严重程度如何与不同的轨迹类别相关。方法:我们找到了研究抑郁和焦虑的纵向变化的论文。轨迹分类分为反应者、改善者和非改善者。运用叙事综合和元分析来探索班级的数量和性质、它们与研究特征的关联以及轨迹班级成员的预测因素。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO) (CRD42023393155)上预先注册,作者遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。结果:共鉴定出18篇论文,包括22个2 ~ 6类的模型。回应类和不改进类占了上风。元回归没有发现与这些类别的比例相关的特征。最初的抑郁和焦虑水平预测了彼此的班级成员轨迹,但并不总是无反应。失业、自杀、社会功能障碍、治疗类型和药物使用预测遵循无反应轨迹。结论:我们的研究结果强调了焦虑和抑郁的初始严重程度及其在心理干预期间的变化之间的复杂关系。它们为从业人员提供了与症状变化的非反应模式相关的因素的见解。
{"title":"The impact of initial depression and anxiety levels on symptom severity change during psychological treatment for common mental disorders: a systematic review.","authors":"Anna Kamardina, Rob Saunders, Emma Broglia","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2622085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2622085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression and anxiety are highly comorbid conditions, which may impact treatment response.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We intended to examine how depression and anxiety symptoms change during psychological interventions for adults and how the initial severity is associated with distinct trajectory classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified papers examining longitudinal changes in depression and anxiety. Trajectory classes were grouped into responders, improvers and non-improvers. Narrative synthesis, alongside meta-analysis, was applied to explore the number and nature of classes, their associations with study characteristics and predictors of trajectory class membership. This study was pre-registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023393155), and the authors followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 18 papers, including 22 models with two to six classes. Responding and non-improving classes prevailed. Meta-regression revealed no characteristics associated with the proportion of these classes. Initial depression and anxiety levels predicted trajectory class membership for each other, but not always non-response. Unemployment, suicidality, social functioning impairment, treatment type and medication use predicted following non-responding trajectory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the complex relationship between initial anxiety and depression severity and their changes during psychological interventions. They provide practitioners with insights into factors associated with non-response patterns of symptom change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reducing incidents of self-harm in mental health wards: a tale of two rates. 减少精神健康病房的自残事件:两个比率的故事。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-04 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2026.2622086
Kia-Chong Chua
{"title":"Reducing incidents of self-harm in mental health wards: a tale of two rates.","authors":"Kia-Chong Chua","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2026.2622086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2622086","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146120473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-production of accessible digital mental health supports with marginalised young people: a scoping review. 与边缘化青年共同制作可获得的数字精神卫生支持:范围审查。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2512317
Carmen Kealy, Courtney Potts, Alba Madrid-Cagigal, Maurice D Mulvenna, Gary Donohoe, Siobhan O'Neill, Margaret M Barry

Background and aims: While some digital supports aid in improving young people's mental health, there is a dearth of information regarding the most effective ways to involve young people in the co-production of digital technologies. User input is essential, particularly for marginalised young people who are often excluded. The aim of this scoping review was to examine recent literature on the most common co-production processes of digital mental health supports with marginalised young people.

Method: A scoping review was conducted to identify literature published since 2021, written in English, focusing on co-production processes of digital mental health supports with marginalised young people aged 16-25. Basic information, data relating to the research question and key findings were extracted. A combination of Excel and Covidence management software was used to collate the charted data and manage the screening process. Studies were included if they used innovative youth-led approaches in the design, development, implementation or evaluation of digital mental health supports ranging from mental health promotion to targeted interventions.

Results: Out of 2341 studies initially screened, 21 studies published between 2021 and 2023 with a range of study designs and evidence were included. The studies reported on engagement with marginalised young people in the design, implementation, and/or evaluation of digital mental health technologies. The review examined qualitative and mixed methods studies from eleven countries, with most co-produced digital supports relating to mental health promotion and prevention. Most common were supports targeting general mental health and mental wellbeing. More than half of the studies included representation from LGBTQ+ young people, followed by ethnic minorities and migrants, but few included other marginalised groups. Only 6 of 21 studies used innovative approaches and many typically involved young people in only one of the co-production processes with design identified as most common. Finally, passive rather than active participation of young people was found to be pronounced. This limits young people's opportunities to shape the outcome to the data collection process only.

Conclusion: Given the extent to which marginalised groups are actually involved in co-production, the review suggests the need for young people to be more actively involved in all co-production processes of digital mental health technologies. Offering a diverse range of methods through innovative, participatory approaches can facilitate more effective engagement from young people and provide an environment that is inclusive to a range of voices and perspectives. Lastly, the lack of inclusion of marginalised groups such as young people with a disability, or youth living in rural areas is an important issue to consider for future research.

背景和目的:虽然一些数字支持有助于改善年轻人的心理健康,但缺乏关于让年轻人参与数字技术联合生产的最有效方式的信息。用户的投入至关重要,特别是对于经常被排除在外的边缘化年轻人。本次范围审查的目的是审查最近关于边缘化年轻人最常见的数字心理健康支持合作生产过程的文献。方法:对自2021年以来发表的英文文献进行了范围审查,重点关注16-25岁边缘化年轻人的数字心理健康支持合作生产过程。提取与研究问题有关的基本信息、数据和主要发现。结合使用Excel和冠状病毒管理软件对图表数据进行整理和筛选过程管理。如果研究在设计、开发、实施或评估数字心理健康支持(从心理健康促进到有针对性的干预措施)方面采用了由青年主导的创新方法,则纳入研究。结果:在最初筛选的2341项研究中,21项在2021年至2023年间发表的研究纳入了一系列研究设计和证据。这些研究报告了边缘化年轻人参与数字心理健康技术的设计、实施和/或评估的情况。该审查审查了来自11个国家的定性和混合方法研究,其中大多数是共同制作的与心理健康促进和预防有关的数字支持。最常见的是针对一般心理健康和心理福祉的支持。超过一半的研究包括LGBTQ+年轻人的代表,其次是少数民族和移民,但很少包括其他边缘化群体。在21项研究中,只有6项采用了创新方法,许多研究通常只让年轻人参与其中一项共同生产过程,其中设计被认为是最常见的。最后,青年的被动参与比积极参与更为明显。这限制了年轻人在数据收集过程中塑造结果的机会。结论:鉴于边缘化群体实际参与联合生产的程度,该审查建议年轻人需要更积极地参与数字精神卫生技术的所有联合生产过程。通过创新的参与性方法提供多种方法,可以促进年轻人更有效地参与,并提供一个包容各种声音和观点的环境。最后,缺乏对边缘群体的包容,如残疾青年或生活在农村地区的青年,是未来研究需要考虑的一个重要问题。
{"title":"Co-production of accessible digital mental health supports with marginalised young people: a scoping review.","authors":"Carmen Kealy, Courtney Potts, Alba Madrid-Cagigal, Maurice D Mulvenna, Gary Donohoe, Siobhan O'Neill, Margaret M Barry","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512317","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2512317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>While some digital supports aid in improving young people's mental health, there is a dearth of information regarding the most effective ways to involve young people in the co-production of digital technologies. User input is essential, particularly for marginalised young people who are often excluded. The aim of this scoping review was to examine recent literature on the most common co-production processes of digital mental health supports with marginalised young people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted to identify literature published since 2021, written in English, focusing on co-production processes of digital mental health supports with marginalised young people aged 16-25. Basic information, data relating to the research question and key findings were extracted. A combination of Excel and Covidence management software was used to collate the charted data and manage the screening process. Studies were included if they used innovative youth-led approaches in the design, development, implementation or evaluation of digital mental health supports ranging from mental health promotion to targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2341 studies initially screened, 21 studies published between 2021 and 2023 with a range of study designs and evidence were included. The studies reported on engagement with marginalised young people in the design, implementation, and/or evaluation of digital mental health technologies. The review examined qualitative and mixed methods studies from eleven countries, with most co-produced digital supports relating to mental health promotion and prevention. Most common were supports targeting general mental health and mental wellbeing. More than half of the studies included representation from LGBTQ+ young people, followed by ethnic minorities and migrants, but few included other marginalised groups. Only 6 of 21 studies used innovative approaches and many typically involved young people in only one of the co-production processes with design identified as most common. Finally, passive rather than active participation of young people was found to be pronounced. This limits young people's opportunities to shape the outcome to the data collection process only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the extent to which marginalised groups are actually involved in co-production, the review suggests the need for young people to be more actively involved in all co-production processes of digital mental health technologies. Offering a diverse range of methods through innovative, participatory approaches can facilitate more effective engagement from young people and provide an environment that is inclusive to a range of voices and perspectives. Lastly, the lack of inclusion of marginalised groups such as young people with a disability, or youth living in rural areas is an important issue to consider for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"76-93"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring intimate relationship self-stigma in serious mental illness: scale development and validation. 严重精神疾病中亲密关系自我污名的测量:量表开发与验证。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2595604
Meryl Caiada, Antoinette Prouteau, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Justin Lamontagne, Emma Tison, Kevin-Marc Valery, Luc Vigneault, Tania Lecomte

Background: Individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI) face pervasive stigma, with damaging effects on their intimate lives. Although evidence suggests individuals might endorse stereotypes about their romantic relationships, no tool has addressed self-stigma in this domain.

Aims: This study aimed to develop and validate the Intimate Relationship Self-Stigma Scale (IRSS), specifically, to determine its structural and construct validity, as well as the internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Methods: This instrument was co-constructed with peer support workers living with SMI. Using a bipolar semantic differential format, the IRSS captures both self-stigmatizing beliefs and positive self-perceptions. Items were generated through focus groups and literature review. Participants with SMI (N = 150) completed the IRSS online, along with measures of internalized stigma, self-esteem, and romantic functioning.

Results: Exploratory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure-Disclosure Effects, Self-Attractiveness, Stability, and Intimacy Needs-explaining 48.6% of the variance. Subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (ω = .69-.87), test-retest reliability (ICC = .79-.93), and expected correlations with related constructs.

Conclusion: The IRSS fills a critical gap in recovery-oriented mental health care by providing a comprehensive assessment of internalized stigma in romantic contexts while simultaneously capturing positive self-perceptions. Further validation, including confirmatory factor analyses and cross-cultural validity, is warranted.

背景:患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体面临普遍的耻辱,对他们的亲密生活产生破坏性影响。尽管有证据表明,个人可能会认同他们对恋爱关系的刻板印象,但在这一领域,没有工具能解决自我耻辱。目的:本研究旨在开发和验证亲密关系自我污名量表(IRSS),确定其结构效度和构效度,以及内部一致性和重测信度。方法:与重度精神障碍患者的同伴支持工作者共同构建该量表。IRSS使用双极性语义差异格式,捕获自我污名化信念和积极的自我感知。项目通过焦点小组和文献综述产生。重度精神障碍的参与者(N = 150)在线完成了IRSS,以及内化耻辱、自尊和浪漫功能的测量。结果:探索性因素分析支持一个四因素结构——披露效应、自我吸引力、稳定性和亲密需求——解释了48.6%的方差。子量表显示出令人满意的内部一致性(ω = 0.69 - 0.87)、重测信度(ICC = 0.79 - 0.93)以及与相关构念的预期相关性。结论:IRSS通过提供浪漫情境中内化污名的综合评估,同时捕捉到积极的自我认知,填补了以康复为导向的精神卫生保健的重要空白。进一步的验证,包括验证性因素分析和跨文化有效性,是必要的。
{"title":"Measuring intimate relationship self-stigma in serious mental illness: scale development and validation.","authors":"Meryl Caiada, Antoinette Prouteau, Simon Felix, Sarah Guionnet, Justin Lamontagne, Emma Tison, Kevin-Marc Valery, Luc Vigneault, Tania Lecomte","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2595604","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2595604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI) face pervasive stigma, with damaging effects on their intimate lives. Although evidence suggests individuals might endorse stereotypes about their romantic relationships, no tool has addressed self-stigma in this domain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate the Intimate Relationship Self-Stigma Scale (IRSS), specifically, to determine its structural and construct validity, as well as the internal consistency and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This instrument was co-constructed with peer support workers living with SMI. Using a bipolar semantic differential format, the IRSS captures both self-stigmatizing beliefs and positive self-perceptions. Items were generated through focus groups and literature review. Participants with SMI (N = 150) completed the IRSS online, along with measures of internalized stigma, self-esteem, and romantic functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure-Disclosure Effects, Self-Attractiveness, Stability, and Intimacy Needs-explaining 48.6% of the variance. Subscales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (ω = .69-.87), test-retest reliability (ICC = .79-.93), and expected correlations with related constructs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IRSS fills a critical gap in recovery-oriented mental health care by providing a comprehensive assessment of internalized stigma in romantic contexts while simultaneously capturing positive self-perceptions. Further validation, including confirmatory factor analyses and cross-cultural validity, is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review. 在精神卫生保健中使用以康复为重点的prom:什么是帮助,什么是阻碍?范围审查。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2607985
Asha Zappa, Justin Newton Scanlan, Anne Honey, Nicola Hancock

Background: Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures.

Aim: To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice.

Methods: Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted.

Results: Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access.

Conclusions: More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways.

Prisma/prospero: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews.

背景:以康复为重点的个人/病人报告的结果测量(PROMs)对于康复为导向的服务很重要,但工作者在实践中嵌入它们的速度很慢。人们对影响工人使用这些措施的因素知之甚少。目的:综合同行评议文献关于精神卫生工作者报告在实践中使用以康复为重点的prom的促进因素和障碍。方法:检索5个数据库。数据从符合纳入标准的出版物中提取,制成表格,并以图形方式呈现。还进行了定性专题分析。结果:在30个以恢复为重点的prom中,只有6个发表了工作报告,报告了员工使用它们的经验。影响PROM使用的因素包括:组织和结构因素;值校准;心理测验学工具;感知到与实践和获得服务的人的相关性;员工是否认为工具有用和有意义,以及是否易于使用和获取。结论:如果要常规地使用以恢复为重点的工具来协同支持人们探索自己与恢复相关的优势和优先事项,则需要做更多的工作来满足工人的需求。工具特定的方面和组织结构,可以支持或阻碍工人在日常和恢复导向的方式中使用这些工具。Prisma/prospero:遵循了Prisma范围审查扩展(Prisma - scr)。普洛斯彼罗不接受范围审查协议。
{"title":"Using recovery-focused PROMs in mental health care: what helps and what gets in the way? A scoping review.","authors":"Asha Zappa, Justin Newton Scanlan, Anne Honey, Nicola Hancock","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2607985","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2607985","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recovery-focused person/patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), are important for recovery-oriented services, but workers have been slow to embed them within practice. Little is known about factors that influence workers use of these measures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesise peer reviewed literature regarding the enablers and barriers mental health workers report to using recovery-focused PROMs in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched. Data were extracted from publications meeting the inclusion criteria, tabulated, and presented graphically. A qualitative thematic analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only six of 30 recovery-focused PROMs had any published work reporting staff experiences of using them. Aspects influencing PROM use included: organisational and structural factors; value alignment; tool psychometrics; perceived relevance to practice and people accessing service; whether staff deemed tools to be useful and meaningful, and ease of use and access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More work is needed to address worker needs if recovery-focused tools are to be used routinely to collaboratively support people to explore their own recovery-related strengths and priorities. Both tool specific aspects, and organisational structures, that can support or hinder workers to use these tools in routine and recovery-oriented ways.</p><p><strong>Prisma/prospero: </strong>The PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was followed. Prospero does not accept protocols for scoping reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Portrayal of mental illness and suicide in Facebook posts by Australian news organisations. 澳大利亚新闻机构在Facebook帖子中对精神疾病和自杀的描述。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2528187
Julia Lyons, Gayle McNaught, Elizabeth Paton, Amy J Morgan, Melinda Benson, Anna M Ross

Background: Trends in news being increasingly accessed via social media warrants more attention to how mental illness and suicide news is being communicated on social platforms, which have the potential to amplify or mitigate stigma in wider audiences.

Aims: This study aimed to determine how mental illness and suicide are portrayed in Facebook posts by Australian news organisations, and examine engagement trends with these posts.

Method: A systematic search of 22 Australian news Facebook pages was conducted on Meta's CrowdTangle database for posts about mental illness or suicide over a 1-year period.

Results: Of the 1343 Facebook news posts identified, over half (55%) comprised "helpful" content. News posts featuring people with lived experience were the most common topics with helpful content, however harmful content was still prominent. Problematic content in news posts often included sensationalist, trivialising, or "suffering" language, and stigmatising or sensationalist quotes. Public engagement with news posts did not differ based on alignment with media guidelines.

Conclusions: There is substantial room for improvement in how mental illness and suicide-related news is communicated on social media. Ensuring this aligns with responsible media guidelines will reduce public exposure to content that can perpetuate stigma and increase harms.

背景:越来越多通过社交媒体获取的新闻趋势需要更多地关注精神疾病和自杀新闻如何在社交平台上传播,这有可能在更广泛的受众中放大或减轻耻辱。目的:本研究旨在确定澳大利亚新闻机构如何在Facebook帖子中描述精神疾病和自杀,并检查这些帖子的参与趋势。方法:在Meta的CrowdTangle数据库中对22个澳大利亚新闻Facebook页面进行了系统搜索,以获取1年内有关精神疾病或自杀的帖子。结果:在1343个Facebook新闻帖子中,超过一半(55%)包含“有用”的内容。以有亲身经历的人为主题的新闻帖子是最常见的有益内容,但有害内容仍然很突出。新闻帖子中的问题内容通常包括耸人听闻、轻视或“痛苦”的语言,以及污名化或耸人听闻的引用。公众对新闻帖子的参与并没有因与媒体准则的一致性而有所不同。结论:在社交媒体上传播精神疾病和自杀相关新闻的方式有很大的改进空间。确保这与负责任的媒体准则保持一致,将减少公众接触可能使污名永久化并增加危害的内容。
{"title":"Portrayal of mental illness and suicide in Facebook posts by Australian news organisations.","authors":"Julia Lyons, Gayle McNaught, Elizabeth Paton, Amy J Morgan, Melinda Benson, Anna M Ross","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2528187","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2528187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trends in news being increasingly accessed via social media warrants more attention to how mental illness and suicide news is being communicated on social platforms, which have the potential to amplify or mitigate stigma in wider audiences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to determine how mental illness and suicide are portrayed in Facebook posts by Australian news organisations, and examine engagement trends with these posts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of 22 Australian news Facebook pages was conducted on Meta's CrowdTangle database for posts about mental illness or suicide over a 1-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1343 Facebook news posts identified, over half (55%) comprised \"helpful\" content. News posts featuring people with lived experience were the most common topics with helpful content, however harmful content was still prominent. Problematic content in news posts often included sensationalist, trivialising, or \"suffering\" language, and stigmatising or sensationalist quotes. Public engagement with news posts did not differ based on alignment with media guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is substantial room for improvement in how mental illness and suicide-related news is communicated on social media. Ensuring this aligns with responsible media guidelines will reduce public exposure to content that can perpetuate stigma and increase harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"4-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144601923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental health nurse practitioner psychotherapy; a scoping review. 心理保健执业护士心理治疗;范围审查。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2558505
Toby Raeburn, Meena Gupta, Lainie Cadry, Matthew Ireland

Background: Mental health nurse practitioners represent a workforce with capacity to significantly contribute to meeting public need for psychotherapy.

Aim: The purpose of this scoping review study is to synthesize evidence regarding mental health nurse practitioner use of psychotherapy.

Methods: Arksey and O' Malley's framework was used to guide the review which sought and synthesized papers written in English published between January 2000- April 2025 describing mental health nurse practitioners use of psychotherapy.

Results: Sixteen papers were included, nine written in the United States, four from Australia, and one each from South Africa, the Netherlands and Korea. Studies revealed that mental health nurse practitioners utilize a wide range of psychotherapy to assist people throughout the lifespan and across diverse settings. However, despite such wide-ranging and valuable service provision regulatory barriers often restrict mental health nurse practitioners' delivery of psychotherapy.

Conclusion: Evidence outlined in this scoping review challenges governments, policy advisors and service managers to better support mental health nurse practitioners as they seek to serve their communities by providing psychotherapy alongside other forms of mental healthcare.

背景:心理健康护士从业人员代表了一个有能力为满足公众心理治疗需求做出重大贡献的劳动力队伍。目的:本范围回顾研究的目的是综合有关心理健康护理从业人员使用心理治疗的证据。方法:采用Arksey和O' Malley的框架进行综述,检索并综合2000年1月至2025年4月期间发表的描述心理健康护理从业人员使用心理治疗的英文论文。结果:共纳入16篇论文,其中9篇来自美国,4篇来自澳大利亚,南非、荷兰和韩国各1篇。研究表明,心理健康护士从业人员利用广泛的心理治疗来帮助人们在整个生命周期和不同的环境。然而,尽管提供如此广泛和有价值的服务,监管障碍往往限制心理健康护士从业人员提供心理治疗。结论:在这个范围审查中概述的证据挑战政府,政策顾问和服务经理,以更好地支持心理健康护士从业人员,因为他们寻求通过提供心理治疗和其他形式的心理保健服务于他们的社区。
{"title":"Mental health nurse practitioner psychotherapy; a scoping review.","authors":"Toby Raeburn, Meena Gupta, Lainie Cadry, Matthew Ireland","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2558505","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2558505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health nurse practitioners represent a workforce with capacity to significantly contribute to meeting public need for psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review study is to synthesize evidence regarding mental health nurse practitioner use of psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Arksey and O' Malley's framework was used to guide the review which sought and synthesized papers written in English published between January 2000- April 2025 describing mental health nurse practitioners use of psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen papers were included, nine written in the United States, four from Australia, and one each from South Africa, the Netherlands and Korea. Studies revealed that mental health nurse practitioners utilize a wide range of psychotherapy to assist people throughout the lifespan and across diverse settings. However, despite such wide-ranging and valuable service provision regulatory barriers often restrict mental health nurse practitioners' delivery of psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence outlined in this scoping review challenges governments, policy advisors and service managers to better support mental health nurse practitioners as they seek to serve their communities by providing psychotherapy alongside other forms of mental healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"94-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145076416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the countermovement to online presentations of psychiatric disorder that are perceived as "faked". 了解对被认为是“伪造”的精神疾病在线展示的反作用力。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2558503
Vaughan Bell, Rhiannon White, Lucy Foulkes

Background: The self-presentation of psychiatric disorders on social media has generated a countermovement of sceptics who believe some are "faked" for reasons of self-promotion. This has been the focus of a Reddit forum called r/FakeDisorderCringe, an active community with almost 300,000 members. Given the influence of online discourse on public attitudes, understanding which diagnoses attract the most scepticism and what conversational themes surround these concerns is important in understanding lay controversies in mental health.

Methods: We used topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet allocation, a natural language processing technique, to analyse over 850,000 forum posts from August 2020 to December 2022 to identify the main topics.

Results: Topic modelling identified 15 topics, of which several identified specific disorders: anxiety, depression, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), ADHD (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder), autism, Tourette's syndrome and tics, and DID (dissociative identity disorder). Other topics included faking and attention-seeking, school and childhood context, trauma and abuse, validity of self-diagnosis, medical research evidence, gender identity and sexuality, profanity, and sarcasm-laden commentary.

Conclusions: This scepticism does not mirror previously identified public doubts about the legitimacy of specific diagnoses and seems to more commonly focus on conditions that have seen a recent increase in diagnosis in young people.

背景:精神疾病在社交媒体上的自我展示引发了怀疑论者的反运动,他们认为有些是出于自我推销的原因而“伪造”的。这一直是Reddit论坛r/FakeDisorderCringe的焦点,这是一个拥有近30万成员的活跃社区。考虑到网络话语对公众态度的影响,了解哪些诊断吸引了最多的怀疑,以及围绕这些问题的对话主题对于理解心理健康中的争论是很重要的。方法:我们使用自然语言处理技术潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet allocation)进行主题建模,分析了2020年8月至2022年12月期间超过85万篇论坛帖子,以确定主要主题。结果:主题建模确定了15个主题,其中几个确定了特定的疾病:焦虑、抑郁、强迫症、注意力缺陷和多动障碍、自闭症、图雷特综合征和抽搐,以及DID(分离性身份障碍)。其他话题包括假装和寻求关注、学校和童年背景、创伤和虐待、自我诊断的有效性、医学研究证据、性别认同和性取向、亵渎和充满讽刺的评论。结论:这种怀疑并没有反映出先前确定的公众对特定诊断合法性的怀疑,似乎更普遍地关注于最近在年轻人中诊断增加的情况。
{"title":"Understanding the countermovement to online presentations of psychiatric disorder that are perceived as \"faked\".","authors":"Vaughan Bell, Rhiannon White, Lucy Foulkes","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2558503","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2558503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The self-presentation of psychiatric disorders on social media has generated a countermovement of sceptics who believe some are \"faked\" for reasons of self-promotion. This has been the focus of a Reddit forum called r/FakeDisorderCringe, an active community with almost 300,000 members. Given the influence of online discourse on public attitudes, understanding which diagnoses attract the most scepticism and what conversational themes surround these concerns is important in understanding lay controversies in mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used topic modelling using Latent Dirichlet allocation, a natural language processing technique, to analyse over 850,000 forum posts from August 2020 to December 2022 to identify the main topics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Topic modelling identified 15 topics, of which several identified specific disorders: anxiety, depression, OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder), ADHD (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder), autism, Tourette's syndrome and tics, and DID (dissociative identity disorder). Other topics included faking and attention-seeking, school and childhood context, trauma and abuse, validity of self-diagnosis, medical research evidence, gender identity and sexuality, profanity, and sarcasm-laden commentary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scepticism does not mirror previously identified public doubts about the legitimacy of specific diagnoses and seems to more commonly focus on conditions that have seen a recent increase in diagnosis in young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145055884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations between mental health services and individuals' worry about harm from mental health issues: an international perspective. 心理健康服务与个人对心理健康问题危害的担忧之间的联系:国际视角。
IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2528209
Chia-Wen Wang, Carolyn J Lo, Wei Lun Yuen, Alex R Cook, Leonard Lee, Yiyun Shou

Background: Quality mental health services are pivotal in addressing mental health issues worldwide. Despite this importance, many countries face challenges in providing accessible, high-quality mental health care.

Aims: This study examines the nexus between mental health services and worry about mental health issues across different countries.

Methods: This study used data from the Lloyd's Register Foundation 2021 World Risk Poll, the OECD, the World Health Organization, and Our World in Data. The variables include worry about the personal harm that mental health issues could cause, mental health services (i.e. service facilities, service availability, and service utilisation), and estimated prevalences of major mental disorders.

Results: The results revealed that structural components - specifically the availability of mental health outpatient facilities - were associated with less worry about mental health issues across countries. However, no significant association was observed between process components - such as service utilisation - and worry about mental health issues. Additionally, the association between the prevalence of various mental disorders and worry about mental health issues showed mixed results.

Conclusions: The findings emphasise the importance of increasing the availability of these facilities to ensure universal access to essential mental health care, thereby improving mental well-being across both low-income and high-income countries.

背景:高质量的精神卫生服务是解决全球精神卫生问题的关键。尽管具有这种重要性,但许多国家在提供可获得的高质量精神卫生保健方面面临挑战。目的:本研究探讨了不同国家的心理健康服务和对心理健康问题的担忧之间的联系。方法:本研究使用的数据来自劳氏船级社基金会2021年世界风险调查、经合组织、世界卫生组织和我们的数据世界。这些变量包括对精神卫生问题可能造成的个人伤害的担忧、精神卫生服务(即服务设施、服务提供情况和服务利用情况)以及严重精神障碍的估计患病率。结果:结果显示,各国的结构成分——特别是精神卫生门诊设施的可用性——与对精神卫生问题的担忧程度较低有关。然而,在过程组成部分(如服务利用率)和对心理健康问题的担忧之间没有观察到显著的关联。此外,各种精神障碍的患病率与对精神健康问题的担忧之间的关系显示出不同的结果。结论:研究结果强调了增加这些设施的可用性的重要性,以确保普遍获得基本的精神卫生保健,从而改善低收入和高收入国家的精神健康。
{"title":"Associations between mental health services and individuals' worry about harm from mental health issues: an international perspective.","authors":"Chia-Wen Wang, Carolyn J Lo, Wei Lun Yuen, Alex R Cook, Leonard Lee, Yiyun Shou","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2528209","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09638237.2025.2528209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality mental health services are pivotal in addressing mental health issues worldwide. Despite this importance, many countries face challenges in providing accessible, high-quality mental health care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examines the nexus between mental health services and worry about mental health issues across different countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the Lloyd's Register Foundation 2021 World Risk Poll, the OECD, the World Health Organization, and Our World in Data. The variables include worry about the personal harm that mental health issues could cause, mental health services (i.e. service facilities, service availability, and service utilisation), and estimated prevalences of major mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that structural components - specifically the availability of mental health outpatient facilities - were associated with less worry about mental health issues across countries. However, no significant association was observed between process components - such as service utilisation - and worry about mental health issues. Additionally, the association between the prevalence of various mental disorders and worry about mental health issues showed mixed results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasise the importance of increasing the availability of these facilities to ensure universal access to essential mental health care, thereby improving mental well-being across both low-income and high-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"14-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144650945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Mental Health
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1