Housing cost burden and life satisfaction.

Arthur Acolin, Vincent Reina
{"title":"Housing cost burden and life satisfaction.","authors":"Arthur Acolin, Vincent Reina","doi":"10.1007/s10901-021-09921-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The share of income spent on housing varies across individuals and countries but it has been increasing over time in a wide range of countries, particularly among lower income households, rising housing affordability as a prominent challenge in higher income economies. Variations in share of income spent on housing can reflect variations in household preferences but when more than a certain level of income is spent on housing, households face tradeoffs between housing and non-housing consumption that are expected to negatively affect their overall life satisfaction. Using data from the 2018 European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) for 14 countries we find that, controlling for household sociodemographic characteristics, households spending more than 30 percent of their income and those spending more than 50 percent of their income on housing report lower levels of life satisfaction, with the latter group reporting the lowest level. The negative relationship between housing cost burden and reported life satisfaction is found across countries but varies in magnitude, which points to the need to further investigate the mechanisms behind the association between housing cost burden and life satisfaction and the role of country-specific effects, including differences in welfare systems, in moderating this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":73781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09921-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The share of income spent on housing varies across individuals and countries but it has been increasing over time in a wide range of countries, particularly among lower income households, rising housing affordability as a prominent challenge in higher income economies. Variations in share of income spent on housing can reflect variations in household preferences but when more than a certain level of income is spent on housing, households face tradeoffs between housing and non-housing consumption that are expected to negatively affect their overall life satisfaction. Using data from the 2018 European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) for 14 countries we find that, controlling for household sociodemographic characteristics, households spending more than 30 percent of their income and those spending more than 50 percent of their income on housing report lower levels of life satisfaction, with the latter group reporting the lowest level. The negative relationship between housing cost burden and reported life satisfaction is found across countries but varies in magnitude, which points to the need to further investigate the mechanisms behind the association between housing cost burden and life satisfaction and the role of country-specific effects, including differences in welfare systems, in moderating this association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住房成本负担与生活满意度。
住房支出占收入的比例因个人和国家而异,但随着时间的推移,在许多国家,特别是在低收入家庭中,这一比例一直在增加,住房负担能力的提高是高收入经济体面临的一个突出挑战。用于住房的收入份额的变化可以反映家庭偏好的变化,但当用于住房的收入超过一定水平时,家庭面临住房和非住房消费之间的权衡,预计这将对他们的总体生活满意度产生负面影响。利用2018年欧盟收入和生活条件统计数据(EU-SILC)对14个国家的数据,我们发现,在控制家庭社会人口特征的情况下,将收入的30%以上用于住房的家庭和将收入的50%以上用于住房的家庭报告的生活满意度水平较低,后者报告的水平最低。住房成本负担和报告的生活满意度之间的负相关关系在各个国家都有发现,但在程度上有所不同,这表明需要进一步调查住房成本负担和生活满意度之间关联背后的机制,以及国家特定影响的作用,包括福利制度的差异,在缓和这种关联方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sales prices, social rigidity and the second home property market. Correlates of dormitory satisfaction and differences involving social density and room locations. Private renters in shared housing: investigating housing conditions and mental well-being in Australia during COVID-19. Effects of housing layout and perceived behavioral control over social distancing in relation between social isolation and psychological distress during pandemic of COVID-19. Do COVID-19 pandemic-related policy shocks flatten the bid-rent curve? Evidence from real estate markets in Shanghai.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1