Private renters in shared housing: investigating housing conditions and mental well-being in Australia during COVID-19.

Piret Veeroja, Zoë Goodall, Nestor Agustin Guity-Zapata, Wendy Stone
{"title":"Private renters in shared housing: investigating housing conditions and mental well-being in Australia during COVID-19.","authors":"Piret Veeroja,&nbsp;Zoë Goodall,&nbsp;Nestor Agustin Guity-Zapata,&nbsp;Wendy Stone","doi":"10.1007/s10901-023-10038-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lockdowns were the major policy response to COVID-19 containment in many countries, and subsequently many people spent abnormal amounts of time at home. Research has found that housing conditions affected more peoples' mental health during the COVID-19 crisis than prior to it, and vulnerable groups were especially affected. One group that may be particularly vulnerable is private renters in shared housing. Using a socio-economic lens, our research examined to what extent mental well-being outcomes were associated with housing conditions in shared housing under COVID-19 restrictions in Australia. Data about private renters were obtained from the Australian Rental Housing Conditions Dataset (<i>n</i> = 1908), collected in mid-2020 during the easing of the first lockdown restrictions. Respondents living in shared arrangements reported higher levels of worry and anxiety (8.5-13.2%) and loneliness and isolation (3.7-18.3%) compared to other household types. Binary logistic regressions showed that COVID-19-related mental and financial well-being variables were the main contributors in COVID-19-related worry/anxiety and loneliness/isolation models. Accumulated housing problems were the only housing condition measure that was significant in the worry/anxiety model. Participants who had more than two people living in a household felt 1.4 times lonelier/isolated compared to those who lived with four or more people. Males and participants who reported good mental health were less likely to feel COVID-19-related worry/anxiety and loneliness/isolation. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of measures for mental health and income during a pandemic and concludes with recommendations of support for shared housing renters during and beyond crisis events.</p>","PeriodicalId":73781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of housing and the built environment : HBE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10038-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lockdowns were the major policy response to COVID-19 containment in many countries, and subsequently many people spent abnormal amounts of time at home. Research has found that housing conditions affected more peoples' mental health during the COVID-19 crisis than prior to it, and vulnerable groups were especially affected. One group that may be particularly vulnerable is private renters in shared housing. Using a socio-economic lens, our research examined to what extent mental well-being outcomes were associated with housing conditions in shared housing under COVID-19 restrictions in Australia. Data about private renters were obtained from the Australian Rental Housing Conditions Dataset (n = 1908), collected in mid-2020 during the easing of the first lockdown restrictions. Respondents living in shared arrangements reported higher levels of worry and anxiety (8.5-13.2%) and loneliness and isolation (3.7-18.3%) compared to other household types. Binary logistic regressions showed that COVID-19-related mental and financial well-being variables were the main contributors in COVID-19-related worry/anxiety and loneliness/isolation models. Accumulated housing problems were the only housing condition measure that was significant in the worry/anxiety model. Participants who had more than two people living in a household felt 1.4 times lonelier/isolated compared to those who lived with four or more people. Males and participants who reported good mental health were less likely to feel COVID-19-related worry/anxiety and loneliness/isolation. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of measures for mental health and income during a pandemic and concludes with recommendations of support for shared housing renters during and beyond crisis events.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享住房中的私人租房者:调查新冠肺炎期间澳大利亚的住房条件和心理健康状况。
封锁是许多国家遏制新冠肺炎的主要政策措施,随后许多人在家度过了异常长的时间。研究发现,在新冠肺炎危机期间,住房条件对人们心理健康的影响比危机前更多,弱势群体尤其受到影响。一个可能特别脆弱的群体是共享住房中的私人租房者。我们的研究从社会经济角度考察了在澳大利亚新冠肺炎限制下,心理健康结果在多大程度上与共享住房的住房条件相关。关于私人租房者的数据来自澳大利亚租房条件数据集(n = 1908年),收集于2020年年中第一次封锁限制放松期间。与其他家庭类型相比,生活在共同安排中的受访者的担忧和焦虑程度(8.5-13.2%)以及孤独和孤立程度(3.7-18.3%)更高。二元逻辑回归显示,与新冠肺炎相关的心理和财务健康变量是与新冠疫情相关的担忧/焦虑和孤独/隔离模型的主要贡献者。累积的住房问题是在担忧/焦虑模型中唯一显著的住房状况指标。与四个人或四人以上的参与者相比,一个家庭中有两个人以上的参与者感到孤独/孤立1.4倍。报告心理健康状况良好的男性和参与者不太可能感到与新冠肺炎相关的担忧/焦虑和孤独/孤立。我们的分析表明了在疫情期间采取心理健康和收入措施的重要性,并提出了在危机事件期间及之后支持共享住房租户的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sales prices, social rigidity and the second home property market. Correlates of dormitory satisfaction and differences involving social density and room locations. Private renters in shared housing: investigating housing conditions and mental well-being in Australia during COVID-19. Effects of housing layout and perceived behavioral control over social distancing in relation between social isolation and psychological distress during pandemic of COVID-19. Do COVID-19 pandemic-related policy shocks flatten the bid-rent curve? Evidence from real estate markets in Shanghai.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1