Functional and patient-reported outcomes of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): A prospective case series study

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2022.11.002
Cátia Azevedo, Miguel Breda, Daniela Ribeiro, Fernando Milhazes Mar, Sérgio Vilarinho, Luís Dias
{"title":"Functional and patient-reported outcomes of bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): A prospective case series study","authors":"Cátia Azevedo,&nbsp;Miguel Breda,&nbsp;Daniela Ribeiro,&nbsp;Fernando Milhazes Mar,&nbsp;Sérgio Vilarinho,&nbsp;Luís Dias","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes, and their correlation, after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center. All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study. Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation. The PROMs included a generic form (Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey (MOS SF-36)), and three disease-specific forms (Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale (SADLS), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study. The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average (PTA) was 29 dB, with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication (F(3,18) = 2.319, p = 0.110). The greater the preoperative air-bone gap, the greater the functional gain obtained (r = 0.505, p &lt; 0.05). In the PROMs, we found a significant improvement in HHI scores (p &lt; 0.005) and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores (p &lt; 0.05) with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices. We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients. The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/1c/main.PMC9937820.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167229302200068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and patient-reported outcomes, and their correlation, after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted between January 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary care center. All adult patients who were implanted with a percutaneous BAHA device during this evaluation period were included in the study. Complete auditory function and patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in the preoperative period and 6 months after the implant activation. The PROMs included a generic form (Medical Outcome Study 36 Short Form Healthy Survey (MOS SF-36)), and three disease-specific forms (Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale (SADLS), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI)).

Results

Twenty-two patients with an average age of 53 years were included in the study. The overall functional gain with the BAHA in sound-field pure tone average (PTA) was 29 dB, with no statistically significant differences according to surgical indication (F(3,18) = 2.319, p = 0.110). The greater the preoperative air-bone gap, the greater the functional gain obtained (r = 0.505, p < 0.05). In the PROMs, we found a significant improvement in HHI scores (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in overall SADLS scores (p < 0.05) with the use of percutaneous BAHA devices. We did not verify any statistically significant correlation between functional and PROMs results.

Conclusions

The BAHA is a safe and effective alternative hearing rehabilitation option in selected patients. The PROMs results prove patient's overall satisfaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨锚定助听器(BAHA)的功能和患者报告的结果:一项前瞻性病例系列研究
目的本研究的目的是评估经皮骨锚定助听器(BAHA)植入后的功能和患者报告的结果及其相关性。方法于2018年1月至2020年12月在一家三级护理中心进行前瞻性研究。在评估期间植入经皮BAHA装置的所有成年患者均纳入研究。在术前和植入物激活后6个月评估完整的听觉功能和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。PROMs包括一种通用形式(医学结果研究36简式健康调查(MOS SF-36))和三种疾病特异性形式(听力障碍量表(HHI)、日常生活放大满意度量表(SADLS)和耳鸣障碍量表)。BAHA在声场纯音平均值(PTA)中的总体功能增益为29dB,根据手术指征没有统计学显著差异(F(3,18)=2.319,p=0.110)。术前气骨间隙越大,获得的功能增益越大(r=0.505,p<;0.05),我们发现使用经皮BAHA装置可显著改善HHI评分(p<0.005),并显著增加总体SADLS评分(p>0.05)。我们没有验证功能和胎膜早破结果之间的任何统计学显著相关性。结论BAHA是一种安全有效的选择性听力康复选择。PROMs的结果证明了患者的总体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comparative utility of vestibular function tests in patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction Co-infection with Neisseria mucosa in a patient with tuberculous otitis media A case report on a rare case of primary tuberculous otitis media The application of the strip-shaped cymba conchae orthosis in the nonsurgical correction of complex auricular deformity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1