Clinical outcomes of patients treated with template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for post-operative recurrent gynecological malignancies: A retrospective analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2022.123976
Gargee Mulye, Lavanya Gurram, Supriya Chopra, Sudeep Gupta, Jaya Ghosh, Seema Gulia, Amita Maheshwari, Rajendra Kerkar, T S Shylasree, Libin Scaria, Dheera A, Yogesh Ghadi, Satish Kohle, Sudarshan Kadam, Umesh Mahantshetty
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of patients treated with template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for post-operative recurrent gynecological malignancies: A retrospective analysis.","authors":"Gargee Mulye,&nbsp;Lavanya Gurram,&nbsp;Supriya Chopra,&nbsp;Sudeep Gupta,&nbsp;Jaya Ghosh,&nbsp;Seema Gulia,&nbsp;Amita Maheshwari,&nbsp;Rajendra Kerkar,&nbsp;T S Shylasree,&nbsp;Libin Scaria,&nbsp;Dheera A,&nbsp;Yogesh Ghadi,&nbsp;Satish Kohle,&nbsp;Sudarshan Kadam,&nbsp;Umesh Mahantshetty","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2022.123976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the clinical outcomes in patients treated with Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT)-based interstitial brachytherapy boost for primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers, and to perform a comparative analysis with our previously published series of similar patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred and seventeen patients treated between January, 2009 and December, 2015 were evaluated. Descriptive statistics for the patterns of relapse, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities were carried out. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. All variables with the potential to affect outcomes were tested using log-rank test for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 63 months, LRFS, DFS, and OS at 3/5 years were 77.1%/74.7%, 61%/52%, and 72.3%/63.1%, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) of 56 days did not affect outcomes. Bulky tumors and OTT > 63 days adversely affected LRFS. Overall treatment time also significantly impacted DFS and OS. Grade 3-4 late bladder toxicities were observed in 1.7% patients, and grade 3-4 late rectal toxicities in 5% patients. Compared to our previous series, the outcome in the current series is better in terms of severe late toxicities (5% improvement in rectal toxicity, and 2.7% improvement in bladder toxicity) and OS by 10%. This could be attributed to the increasing use of concurrent chemotherapy and relative optimization strategies for organs at risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost using MUPIT resulted in modest clinical outcomes and acceptable late toxicities. OTT was the most important factor affecting the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"14 6","pages":"560-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/6c/JCB-14-49846.PMC9924156.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes in patients treated with Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT)-based interstitial brachytherapy boost for primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers, and to perform a comparative analysis with our previously published series of similar patients.

Material and methods: One hundred and seventeen patients treated between January, 2009 and December, 2015 were evaluated. Descriptive statistics for the patterns of relapse, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities were carried out. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. All variables with the potential to affect outcomes were tested using log-rank test for statistical significance.

Results: At a median follow-up of 63 months, LRFS, DFS, and OS at 3/5 years were 77.1%/74.7%, 61%/52%, and 72.3%/63.1%, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) of 56 days did not affect outcomes. Bulky tumors and OTT > 63 days adversely affected LRFS. Overall treatment time also significantly impacted DFS and OS. Grade 3-4 late bladder toxicities were observed in 1.7% patients, and grade 3-4 late rectal toxicities in 5% patients. Compared to our previous series, the outcome in the current series is better in terms of severe late toxicities (5% improvement in rectal toxicity, and 2.7% improvement in bladder toxicity) and OS by 10%. This could be attributed to the increasing use of concurrent chemotherapy and relative optimization strategies for organs at risk.

Conclusions: Patients with primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost using MUPIT resulted in modest clinical outcomes and acceptable late toxicities. OTT was the most important factor affecting the outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模板的高剂量间质近距离放射治疗提高术后复发妇科恶性肿瘤患者的临床结果:回顾性分析。
目的:报告以Martinez通用会阴间质模板(MUPIT)为基础的间质近距离放射治疗原发性和复发性拱顶癌和阴道癌患者的临床结果,并与我们之前发表的一系列类似患者进行比较分析。材料与方法:对2009年1月至2015年12月收治的117例患者进行评价。对复发模式、局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和晚期毒性进行描述性统计。Kaplan-Meier曲线用于生存分析。所有可能影响结果的变量均采用log-rank检验进行统计学显著性检验。结果:中位随访63个月时,3/5年LRFS、DFS和OS分别为77.1%/74.7%、61%/52%和72.3%/63.1%。56天的总治疗时间(OTT)对结果没有影响。体积较大的肿瘤和OTT > 63天对LRFS有不利影响。总体治疗时间也显著影响DFS和OS。1.7%的患者出现3-4级晚期膀胱毒性,5%的患者出现3-4级晚期直肠毒性。与我们之前的系列研究相比,本系列研究的结果在严重晚期毒性方面更好(直肠毒性改善5%,膀胱毒性改善2.7%),总生存率提高10%。这可能归因于越来越多地使用同步化疗和对危险器官的相对优化策略。结论:原发性和复发性拱顶癌和阴道癌患者接受MUPIT高剂量间质近距离强化治疗后,临床结果一般,晚期毒性可接受。OTT是影响结果的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Clinical value of CT-guided radioactive 125I particle implantation combined with 89SrCl2 in relieving pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases. Comparing swallowing function in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma after upfront brachytherapy followed by IMRT vs. surgery. Hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization in gynecologic brachytherapy: Comparison with conventional method. RE: Efficacy of medial needles in mitigating dose deficits from sub-optimally inserted tandems in cervical interstitial brachytherapy. Personalized brachytherapy in gynecological cancers: procedural narrative in patients with a poor response or challenging anatomy after chemoradiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1