Purpose: To investigate a semi-automatic hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization (HIPO) approach for gynecological brachytherapy that preserves the pear-shaped dose distribution without relying on dummy structures.
Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with gynecological cancers, who underwent combined intracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) brachytherapy. HIPO enables optimization of dwell times for specific applicators, while other applicators are fixed in Oncentra® Brachy. Clinical treatment plans (CPs) were compared based on manual adjustments using four HIPO methods: Hovoid, Hfree, HMS, and HMS*. Hovoid optimized tandem and IS needles with ovoid dwell time fixed; Hfree optimized all applicators with no fixation; HMS optimized IS needles with fixation using modified Manchester system, with safe organs at risks (OARs) doses generated in advance by graphical optimization. In HMS* plan, optimization parameters were adjusted to improve high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) dose coverages based on comparisons between CPs and HMS.
Results: Hovoid, Hfree, HMS, and HMS* achieved clinically acceptable DVH parameters in terms of HR-CTV dose coverage and OARs sparing. However, considerable deviations from the conventional pear-shaped dose distributions were observed, particularly with Hfree, which exhibited zero dose contribution from ovoid applicators. Among all HIPO plans, HMS* with adjusted optimization parameters demonstrated the closest HR-CTV D90% to that of the CP, while maintaining a conventional pear-shaped dose distribution.
Conclusions: We recommend applying the modified Manchester system with safe OARs doses as the object of fixation, given its consistency with the conventional pear-shaped dose distribution. The proposed method demonstrated clinically acceptable dose distribution and DVH parameters.
{"title":"Hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization in gynecologic brachytherapy: Comparison with conventional method.","authors":"Hiroyuki Okamoto, Masato Nishitani, Ayaka Nagao, Naoya Murakami, Noriyuki Okonogi, Jun Takatsu, Kotaro Ijima, Satoshi Nakamura, Takahito Chiba, Hiroki Nakayama, Tetsu Nakaichi, Takumi Sakamoto, Kae Okuma, Hiroshi Igaki, Daisuke Ozaki, Ken Ando, Tatsuya Ohno","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156038","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate a semi-automatic hybrid inverse treatment planning optimization (HIPO) approach for gynecological brachytherapy that preserves the pear-shaped dose distribution without relying on dummy structures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with gynecological cancers, who underwent combined intracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) brachytherapy. HIPO enables optimization of dwell times for specific applicators, while other applicators are fixed in Oncentra<sup>®</sup> Brachy. Clinical treatment plans (CPs) were compared based on manual adjustments using four HIPO methods: H<sub>ovoid</sub>, H<sub>free</sub>, H<sub>MS</sub>, and H<sub>MS*</sub>. H<sub>ovoid</sub> optimized tandem and IS needles with ovoid dwell time fixed; H<sub>free</sub> optimized all applicators with no fixation; H<sub>MS</sub> optimized IS needles with fixation using modified Manchester system, with safe organs at risks (OARs) doses generated in advance by graphical optimization. In H<sub>MS*</sub> plan, optimization parameters were adjusted to improve high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) dose coverages based on comparisons between CPs and H<sub>MS</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>H<sub>ovoid</sub>, H<sub>free</sub>, H<sub>MS</sub>, and H<sub>MS*</sub> achieved clinically acceptable DVH parameters in terms of HR-CTV dose coverage and OARs sparing. However, considerable deviations from the conventional pear-shaped dose distributions were observed, particularly with H<sub>free</sub>, which exhibited zero dose contribution from ovoid applicators. Among all HIPO plans, H<sub>MS*</sub> with adjusted optimization parameters demonstrated the closest HR-CTV D<sub>90%</sub> to that of the CP, while maintaining a conventional pear-shaped dose distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend applying the modified Manchester system with safe OARs doses as the object of fixation, given its consistency with the conventional pear-shaped dose distribution. The proposed method demonstrated clinically acceptable dose distribution and DVH parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"340-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of a hydrogel spacer (HS) on dosimetric distribution in the planning target volume as well as on rectal and urethral doses in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer, and to identify prostate sub-regions with improved dosimetric parameters and patient conditions that particularly benefit from the use of HS.
Material and methods: This study included 28 patients, who underwent HDR-BT using HS. Treatment plans with HS and simulated plans without HS were compared. The prostate was divided into six regions: ventral and dorsal in the dorsoventral direction, and apex, mid-gland, and base in the craniocaudal direction. V100% and D90% were evaluated in each region, along with dose assessments for the rectum and urethra. Paired t-tests were performed to analyze significance, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.
Results: HS significantly improved V100% in the dorsal regions (p < 0.05), particularly in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median V100% with and without HS: apex, 100.00 vs. 97.10; mid, 100.00 vs. 97.22). D90% showed improvement across all regions (p < 0.05), with greater effects observed in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median D90% with and without HS: apex, 110.15 vs. 103.56; mid, 113.31 vs. 106.21; d ≥ 0.8). Rectal dose parameters improved significantly (p < 0.05), whereas urethral dose changes were not significant (p = 0.14).
Conclusions: HS effectively reduced rectal doses and improved V100% and D90% in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions of the prostate. These regions are anatomically closer to the rectum and are often subject to dose constraints as well as critical areas for sufficient dose delivery because of the frequent localization of prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, HS is particularly beneficial for patients with dominant lesions in these regions.
目的:本研究主要旨在评估水凝胶间隔剂(HS)对前列腺癌高剂量率近距离放射治疗(HDR-BT)计划靶体积剂量分布的影响,以及对直肠和尿道剂量的影响,并确定使用HS可改善剂量学参数的前列腺亚区和患者状况。材料和方法:本研究纳入28例使用HS进行HDR-BT的患者。将有HS的治疗方案与无HS的模拟方案进行比较。前列腺在背腹方向分为腹侧和背侧6个区域,在颅侧方向分为尖端、腺体中部和基部6个区域。评估每个区域的V100%和D90%,以及直肠和尿道的剂量评估。采用配对t检验分析显著性,并使用Cohen's d计算效应量。结果:HS显著提高了背部区域V100% (p < 0.05),特别是在背端和背中部区域(有和没有HS:顶点的V100%中位数为100.00 vs. 97.10;中位数为100.00 vs. 97.22)。D90%在所有区域均有改善(p < 0.05),其中背端和背中部区域的效果更大(有和没有HS:顶点的D90%中位数为110.15比103.56;中位数为113.31比106.21;d≥0.8)。直肠剂量参数明显改善(p < 0.05),而尿道剂量变化不显著(p = 0.14)。结论:HS有效降低直肠剂量,提高前列腺背端和背中部V100%和D90%。这些区域在解剖学上更接近直肠,经常受到剂量限制,并且由于前列腺癌病变经常定位,因此是足够剂量递送的关键区域。因此,HS对这些区域显性病变的患者特别有益。
{"title":"Analysis of dosimetric improvements using hydrogel spacer in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.","authors":"Moe Honda, Tomoya Oshikane, Motoki Kaidu, Eisuke Abe, Takahiro Komiya, Shumpei Yamako, Yukiyo Goto, Hisashi Nakano, Toshimichi Nakano, Satoshi Tanabe, Atsushi Ohta, Satoru Utsunomiya, Nobuko Yamana, Fumio Ishizaki, Hiroyuki Ishikawa","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155737","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of a hydrogel spacer (HS) on dosimetric distribution in the planning target volume as well as on rectal and urethral doses in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer, and to identify prostate sub-regions with improved dosimetric parameters and patient conditions that particularly benefit from the use of HS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This study included 28 patients, who underwent HDR-BT using HS. Treatment plans with HS and simulated plans without HS were compared. The prostate was divided into six regions: ventral and dorsal in the dorsoventral direction, and apex, mid-gland, and base in the craniocaudal direction. V<sub>100%</sub> and D<sub>90%</sub> were evaluated in each region, along with dose assessments for the rectum and urethra. Paired <i>t</i>-tests were performed to analyze significance, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HS significantly improved V<sub>100%</sub> in the dorsal regions (<i>p</i> < 0.05), particularly in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median V<sub>100%</sub> with and without HS: apex, 100.00 vs. 97.10; mid, 100.00 vs. 97.22). D<sub>90%</sub> showed improvement across all regions (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with greater effects observed in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median D<sub>90%</sub> with and without HS: apex, 110.15 vs. 103.56; mid, 113.31 vs. 106.21; d ≥ 0.8). Rectal dose parameters improved significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas urethral dose changes were not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HS effectively reduced rectal doses and improved V<sub>100%</sub> and D<sub>90%</sub> in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions of the prostate. These regions are anatomically closer to the rectum and are often subject to dose constraints as well as critical areas for sufficient dose delivery because of the frequent localization of prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, HS is particularly beneficial for patients with dominant lesions in these regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"315-321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669822/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: While both surgery and brachytherapy are treatment options for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), the impact of surgery vs. brachytherapy on the swallowing function remains inadequately explored. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the differential impacts of surgery and brachytherapy on swallowing outcomes among OTSCC patients.
Material and methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 30 histologically confirmed OTSCC patients - 14 in the brachytherapy group (HyBIRT) and 16 in the surgery group (SG) - between June 2022 and October 2023. Patients were enrolled only if imaging confirmed a radiological complete response and they remained disease-free for at least 6 months after treatment. Swallowing was assessed using the Swallowing Capacity Scale (SCS), the Malay Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Malay EAT-10), and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS).
Results: The Swallowing Capacity Scale showed that the patients in the HyBIRT had a superior swallowing capacity, with a mean score of 6.5 compared to the SG (mean score of 4.7). The difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.01). In the Malay EAT-10 score, the HyBIRT reported a better median score of 5, which contrasted significantly with the surgical group's median of 22. The p-value < 0.01 was considered significant. Similarly, for the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, where both liquid and semisolid boluses were used, HyBIRT (median score 1) consistently outperformed the SG (median score 2). This result had a p-value of 0.02, which confirmed its statistical significance.
Conclusions: The organ-preserving HyBIRT technique is a promising alternative for managing OTSCC, particularly in preserving swallowing function, and should be further explored in larger, stratified studies with longer follow-up periods to validate these findings.
{"title":"Comparing swallowing function in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma after upfront brachytherapy followed by IMRT vs. surgery.","authors":"Kai Ping Ong, Muhamad Yusri Musa, Irfan Mohamad, Hazama Mohamad, Jasmin Jalil, Gokula Kumar Appalanaido","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155710","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While both surgery and brachytherapy are treatment options for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), the impact of surgery vs. brachytherapy on the swallowing function remains inadequately explored. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the differential impacts of surgery and brachytherapy on swallowing outcomes among OTSCC patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 30 histologically confirmed OTSCC patients - 14 in the brachytherapy group (HyBIRT) and 16 in the surgery group (SG) - between June 2022 and October 2023. Patients were enrolled only if imaging confirmed a radiological complete response and they remained disease-free for at least 6 months after treatment. Swallowing was assessed using the Swallowing Capacity Scale (SCS), the Malay Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Malay EAT-10), and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Swallowing Capacity Scale showed that the patients in the HyBIRT had a superior swallowing capacity, with a mean score of 6.5 compared to the SG (mean score of 4.7). The difference between the two groups was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.01). In the Malay EAT-10 score, the HyBIRT reported a better median score of 5, which contrasted significantly with the surgical group's median of 22. The <i>p</i>-value < 0.01 was considered significant. Similarly, for the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, where both liquid and semisolid boluses were used, HyBIRT (median score 1) consistently outperformed the SG (median score 2). This result had a <i>p</i>-value of 0.02, which confirmed its statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The organ-preserving HyBIRT technique is a promising alternative for managing OTSCC, particularly in preserving swallowing function, and should be further explored in larger, stratified studies with longer follow-up periods to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"300-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669821/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-09-26DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2025.154107
Kashif Ali Sarwar
{"title":"RE: Efficacy of medial needles in mitigating dose deficits from sub-optimally inserted tandems in cervical interstitial brachytherapy.","authors":"Kashif Ali Sarwar","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.154107","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.154107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Brachytherapy plays a critical role in managing gynecological cancers. However, for patients who have a poor response to chemoradiation or present with complex anatomy, delivering tumoricidal doses may be challenging. In this case series, we present a descriptive narrative of techniques adopted for brachytherapy, dosimetric and early clinical outcomes for such clinical challenging cases.
Material and methods: Patients who had a poor response to chemoradiation or with challenging anatomy received individualized brachytherapy between 2021 and 2023. All underwent pre-brachytherapy clinical assessment and MRI. These patients were treated with personalized brachytherapy techniques based on tumor extent and anatomy. Manual dose optimization and adjustments to dose fractionation were tailored on a case-by-case basis maximizing tumor control and limiting organ-at-risk doses.
Results: In the six patients included in this report, the median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) volume was 51.1 cc. For each patient, the implant was individualized using a combination of applicators, 3D-printed applicators or freehand needles. At a median follow-up of 31 months, three out of six patients were locally controlled. Out of the three patients with locally controlled disease, one patient developed grade 2 posterior fourchette necrosis.
Conclusions: Though the results provide a descriptive narrative, they also highlight a clinical care gap that brachytherapy alone cannot yet address for patients. Advancing individualized brachytherapy by incorporating novel agents and techniques may help improve treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Personalized brachytherapy in gynecological cancers: procedural narrative in patients with a poor response or challenging anatomy after chemoradiation.","authors":"Supriya Chopra, Sam David, Anuradha Krishnan, Nisarga Vontikoppal Manjunath, Prachi Mittal, Ankita Gupta, Prachi Sawant, Jeevanshu Jain, Yogesh Ghadi","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155997","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Brachytherapy plays a critical role in managing gynecological cancers. However, for patients who have a poor response to chemoradiation or present with complex anatomy, delivering tumoricidal doses may be challenging. In this case series, we present a descriptive narrative of techniques adopted for brachytherapy, dosimetric and early clinical outcomes for such clinical challenging cases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who had a poor response to chemoradiation or with challenging anatomy received individualized brachytherapy between 2021 and 2023. All underwent pre-brachytherapy clinical assessment and MRI. These patients were treated with personalized brachytherapy techniques based on tumor extent and anatomy. Manual dose optimization and adjustments to dose fractionation were tailored on a case-by-case basis maximizing tumor control and limiting organ-at-risk doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the six patients included in this report, the median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) volume was 51.1 cc. For each patient, the implant was individualized using a combination of applicators, 3D-printed applicators or freehand needles. At a median follow-up of 31 months, three out of six patients were locally controlled. Out of the three patients with locally controlled disease, one patient developed grade 2 posterior fourchette necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though the results provide a descriptive narrative, they also highlight a clinical care gap that brachytherapy alone cannot yet address for patients. Advancing individualized brachytherapy by incorporating novel agents and techniques may help improve treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"282-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669828/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-09DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2025.155095
Luca Tagliaferri, Elisa Placidi, Enrico Rosa, Pierpaolo Dragonetti, Bruno Fionda, Valentina Lancellotta, Martina De Angeli, Stefania Manfrida, Filippo Elvino Leone, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, György Kovacs, Marco De Spirito, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Vincenzo Valentini
Purpose: Interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy) for perineal malignancies, such as anal canal cancer, is challenged by complex pelvic anatomy and procedural limitations. Therefore, TIMER® applicator was developed to address these issues, offering innovative and adaptable design, compatible with multimodal imaging (MRI, CT, PET/CT, US).
Material and methods: TIMER® applicator features MRI/CT compatibility, dual anchoring options, and optimized needle layout to improve dose distribution and anatomical conformity. A dosimetric comparison with two commercial applicators was conducted, evaluating dose non-homogeneity ratio (DNR) across varying clinical target volumes (CTVs).
Results: The TIMER® applicator demonstrated superior dose uniformity, achieving lower DNR values across most configurations and depths. It outperformed both commercially available templates, except for shallow posterior CTVs, where one applicator showed slightly better performance.
Conclusions: The TIMER® applicator enhances dose precision and adaptability in IRT for perineal cancers, outperforming commercial devices in most scenarios. Further refinements and clinical validation will establish its role in advancing IRT protocols.
{"title":"TIMER (gemelli arT Interstitial Multi-imaging pERineal applicator): Dosimetric analysis of homemade device for interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy).","authors":"Luca Tagliaferri, Elisa Placidi, Enrico Rosa, Pierpaolo Dragonetti, Bruno Fionda, Valentina Lancellotta, Martina De Angeli, Stefania Manfrida, Filippo Elvino Leone, Alessio Giuseppe Morganti, György Kovacs, Marco De Spirito, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Vincenzo Valentini","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155095","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy) for perineal malignancies, such as anal canal cancer, is challenged by complex pelvic anatomy and procedural limitations. Therefore, TIMER<sup>®</sup> applicator was developed to address these issues, offering innovative and adaptable design, compatible with multimodal imaging (MRI, CT, PET/CT, US).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>TIMER<sup>®</sup> applicator features MRI/CT compatibility, dual anchoring options, and optimized needle layout to improve dose distribution and anatomical conformity. A dosimetric comparison with two commercial applicators was conducted, evaluating dose non-homogeneity ratio (DNR) across varying clinical target volumes (CTVs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TIMER<sup>®</sup> applicator demonstrated superior dose uniformity, achieving lower DNR values across most configurations and depths. It outperformed both commercially available templates, except for shallow posterior CTVs, where one applicator showed slightly better performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TIMER<sup>®</sup> applicator enhances dose precision and adaptability in IRT for perineal cancers, outperforming commercial devices in most scenarios. Further refinements and clinical validation will establish its role in advancing IRT protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669825/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2025.156049
Liqiu Ji, Wenwen Zhang, Shanhu Hao, Zhiguo Wang, Guoxu Zhang, Jigang Wang
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive iodine-125 (125I) seeds implantation combined with strontium chloride (89SrCl2) in relieving pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases.
Material and methods: Clinical data of 48 patients (aged, 56-85 years) with prostate cancer bone metastases admitted to the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent 125I seeds implantation brachytherapy combined with 89SrCl2 treatment (Group A), and 89SrCl2 treatment alone (Group B).
Results: A total of 722 seeds were implanted in 39 bone metastases of 23 patients in group A; the implantation success rate was 97.44% (38/39), while there were 25 patients in group B. The worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores of group A decreased over time (F-values: 22.47, 5.22, 3.71; p-values: < 0.001, 0.001, 0.007), and the differences in the worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores compared with before treatment were statistically significant at 12 weeks after treatment (t-values: 6.14, 3.36, 2.86; p-values: < 0.001, 0.002, 0.007). The worst pain at 3 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment was not statistically significant compared with pre-treatment (t = 2.01, p = 0.0501), while statistical significance was observed at the remaining 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (t = 7.11, 5.31, 6.14; all p < 0.0001). Also, differences in the worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores of group B before and after treatment were documented.
Conclusions: CT-guided radioactive 125I seeds implantation combined with 89SrCl2 for the treatment of pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases, is a feasible and effective treatment. The effect is relatively significant for breakthrough pain, which improves the quality of life of patients with bone metastasis-related pain.
{"title":"Clinical value of CT-guided radioactive <sup>125</sup>I particle implantation combined with <sup>89</sup>SrCl<sub>2</sub> in relieving pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases.","authors":"Liqiu Ji, Wenwen Zhang, Shanhu Hao, Zhiguo Wang, Guoxu Zhang, Jigang Wang","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156049","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive iodine-125 (<sup>125</sup>I) seeds implantation combined with strontium chloride (<sup>89</sup>SrCl<sub>2</sub>) in relieving pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Clinical data of 48 patients (aged, 56-85 years) with prostate cancer bone metastases admitted to the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent <sup>125</sup>I seeds implantation brachytherapy combined with <sup>89</sup>SrCl<sub>2</sub> treatment (Group A), and <sup>89</sup>SrCl<sub>2</sub> treatment alone (Group B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 722 seeds were implanted in 39 bone metastases of 23 patients in group A; the implantation success rate was 97.44% (38/39), while there were 25 patients in group B. The worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores of group A decreased over time (<i>F</i>-values: 22.47, 5.22, 3.71; <i>p</i>-values: < 0.001, 0.001, 0.007), and the differences in the worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores compared with before treatment were statistically significant at 12 weeks after treatment (<i>t</i>-values: 6.14, 3.36, 2.86; <i>p</i>-values: < 0.001, 0.002, 0.007). The worst pain at 3 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment was not statistically significant compared with pre-treatment (<i>t</i> = 2.01, <i>p</i> = 0.0501), while statistical significance was observed at the remaining 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks (<i>t</i> = 7.11, 5.31, 6.14; all <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Also, differences in the worst pain, average pain, and present pain scores of group B before and after treatment were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT-guided radioactive <sup>125</sup>I seeds implantation combined with <sup>89</sup>SrCl<sub>2</sub> for the treatment of pain after failure of external irradiation in patients with prostate cancer bone metastases, is a feasible and effective treatment. The effect is relatively significant for breakthrough pain, which improves the quality of life of patients with bone metastasis-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"322-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Magnetic resonance (MRI)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) is the gold standard technique for carcinoma cervix. We aimed to evaluate doses to target and organs at risk (OARs), and report clinical outcomes of locally advanced carcinoma cervix (LACC) patients treated with a hybrid approach of using MRI- and computed tomography (CT)-based IGBT.
Material and methods: Twenty-two LACC patients, after receiving external beam radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly, underwent 7 Gy in 3 fractions of IGBT planning with MRI alone at first fraction, and CT at second (CT-1) and third (CT-2) fractions. Dose received by at least 90% of volume (D90) for high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and dose to 0.1 cm3, 1 cm3, and 2 cm3 for OARs was evaluated during each fraction and compared.
Results: The median age was 50 years. Fourteen (63.6%) patients were FIGO (2010) stage II. HR-CTV volumes (mean ±SD) of MRI, CT-1, and CT-2 were 24.23 cc ±9.26 cc, 27.82 cc ±15.37 cc, and 24.82 cc ±11.14 cc, respectively (p = N.S.). HR-CTV D90 (mean ±SD) was significantly higher in MRI-based plans compared with CT-based plans at second fraction (MRI: 108.86 ±24.21% vs. CT-1: 98 ±23.18%, p = 0.03), but not different than CT-based plans at third fraction (MRI: 108.86 ±24.21% vs. CT-2: 106.86 ±17.36%, p = 0.68). No statistically significant differences in doses to the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon were observed between MRI- and CT-based plans (all p > 0.05). 5-year loco-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85.2%, 80.7%, and 79.0%, respectively.
Conclusions: Hybrid approach in IGBT using MRI at first fraction and CT for subsequent fractions yields comparable dosimetric parameters and decent long-term clinical outcomes. This approach could be considered resource-sparing brachytherapy technique.
{"title":"Clinical and dosimetric outcomes of carcinoma cervix patients treated with MRI only at first fraction, followed by CT-based image-guided brachytherapy for subsequent fractions.","authors":"Madhup Rastogi, Ajeet Kumar Gandhi, Avinash Poojari, Vachaspati Mishra, Tenzing Dahla Bhutia, Rakhi Verma, Deepika Ramola, Rohini Khurana, Anoop K Srivastava, Pravin Kumar Das, Abhishek Chauhan, Neetu Singh, Anurag Gupta","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155220","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.155220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance (MRI)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) is the gold standard technique for carcinoma cervix. We aimed to evaluate doses to target and organs at risk (OARs), and report clinical outcomes of locally advanced carcinoma cervix (LACC) patients treated with a hybrid approach of using MRI- and computed tomography (CT)-based IGBT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-two LACC patients, after receiving external beam radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent cisplatin 40 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly, underwent 7 Gy in 3 fractions of IGBT planning with MRI alone at first fraction, and CT at second (CT-1) and third (CT-2) fractions. Dose received by at least 90% of volume (D<sub>90</sub>) for high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and dose to 0.1 cm<sup>3</sup>, 1 cm<sup>3</sup>, and 2 cm<sup>3</sup> for OARs was evaluated during each fraction and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 50 years. Fourteen (63.6%) patients were FIGO (2010) stage II. HR-CTV volumes (mean ±SD) of MRI, CT-1, and CT-2 were 24.23 cc ±9.26 cc, 27.82 cc ±15.37 cc, and 24.82 cc ±11.14 cc, respectively (<i>p</i> = N.S.). HR-CTV D<sub>90</sub> (mean ±SD) was significantly higher in MRI-based plans compared with CT-based plans at second fraction (MRI: 108.86 ±24.21% vs. CT-1: 98 ±23.18%, <i>p</i> = 0.03), but not different than CT-based plans at third fraction (MRI: 108.86 ±24.21% vs. CT-2: 106.86 ±17.36%, <i>p</i> = 0.68). No statistically significant differences in doses to the rectum, bladder, and sigmoid colon were observed between MRI- and CT-based plans (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). 5-year loco-regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85.2%, 80.7%, and 79.0%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid approach in IGBT using MRI at first fraction and CT for subsequent fractions yields comparable dosimetric parameters and decent long-term clinical outcomes. This approach could be considered resource-sparing brachytherapy technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"293-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669827/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-10-31DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2025.156000
Cristina Gutiérrez, Elena Villafranca, Montse Ferrer, Amaya Sola, Andrea Slocker, Montse Ventura, Ignacio Visus, Francisco Pino, Marta Barrado, Margarita Illas, Dina Najjari, Naiara Fuentemilla, Pablo Araguás, Santiago Pellejero, Olatz Garin
Purpose: To determine whether hemi-gland seed brachytherapy (HGBT) is as effective as whole-gland seed brachytherapy (WGBT) in patients with single-lobe, low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Material and methods: Phase II clinical trial in patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk PCa with HGBT. Enrolment took place between 2016 and 2020. All patients (n = 38) underwent HGBT with iodine-125 (125I) seeds. Inclusion criteria: single-lobe prostate cancer, ≤ 2 positive cores in one lobe (≥ 10 core samples), < 50% core invasion, Glea-son ≤ 7 (3 + 4), non-visible or unilaterally visible tumor. Patient-reported expanded prostate cancer index (EPIC-26) questionnaire was administered to assess quality of life (QoL). Treatment outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of patients (n = 700), who underwent transperineal, ultrasound-guided 125I WGBT between 2000 and 2012.
Results: The mean age was 64.9 years (range, 50-78), the mean baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.12 ng/ml (range, 1.53-10), and the mean nadir was 1.4 ng/ml (range, 0.17-4.24). Most patients (37/38) had Gleason 3 + 3. The mean follow-up was 71.4 months (range, 44-93). Seventeen patients developed biochemical relapse, and 14 presented local clinical progression (contralateral, n = 9, ipsilateral + contralateral, n = 4; and regional, n = 1). Salvage therapy was: contralateral low-dose-rate (LDR) BT (n = 6), high-dose-rate (HDR) BT (n = 2), nodal radiation therapy (RT) + hormonotherapy (n = 2), hormonotherapy alone (n = 1), and prostatectomy (n = 1). Thirty-five patients (92.1%) remained alive (12 with biochemical failure) at the final follow-up, while three patients died of other causes. A slight impairment was observed on all EPIC domains (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, bowel, sexual, and hormonal summaries). Compared with the WGBT cohort, urinary irritative/obstructive scores were significantly lower (p = 0.002). At 5 years, biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was 54% in the HGBT group vs. 95% in the WGBT cohort.
Conclusions: In this trial, patients treated with hemi-gland brachytherapy had significantly higher biochemical failure and contralateral relapse rates than a historical cohort of patients treated with WGBT. Larger, well-designed clinical trials are needed to better assess the efficacy of HGBT in the treatment of low-risk PCa.
{"title":"Prospective trial on focal treatment with hemigland brachytherapy in low-risk prostate cancer: A negative study.","authors":"Cristina Gutiérrez, Elena Villafranca, Montse Ferrer, Amaya Sola, Andrea Slocker, Montse Ventura, Ignacio Visus, Francisco Pino, Marta Barrado, Margarita Illas, Dina Najjari, Naiara Fuentemilla, Pablo Araguás, Santiago Pellejero, Olatz Garin","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156000","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.156000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether hemi-gland seed brachytherapy (HGBT) is as effective as whole-gland seed brachytherapy (WGBT) in patients with single-lobe, low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Phase II clinical trial in patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk PCa with HGBT. Enrolment took place between 2016 and 2020. All patients (<i>n</i> = 38) underwent HGBT with iodine-125 (<sup>125</sup>I) seeds. Inclusion criteria: single-lobe prostate cancer, ≤ 2 positive cores in one lobe (≥ 10 core samples), < 50% core invasion, Glea-son ≤ 7 (3 + 4), non-visible or unilaterally visible tumor. Patient-reported expanded prostate cancer index (EPIC-26) questionnaire was administered to assess quality of life (QoL). Treatment outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of patients (<i>n</i> = 700), who underwent transperineal, ultrasound-guided <sup>125</sup>I WGBT between 2000 and 2012.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 64.9 years (range, 50-78), the mean baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 6.12 ng/ml (range, 1.53-10), and the mean nadir was 1.4 ng/ml (range, 0.17-4.24). Most patients (37/38) had Gleason 3 + 3. The mean follow-up was 71.4 months (range, 44-93). Seventeen patients developed biochemical relapse, and 14 presented local clinical progression (contralateral, <i>n</i> = 9, ipsilateral + contralateral, <i>n</i> = 4; and regional, <i>n</i> = 1). Salvage therapy was: contralateral low-dose-rate (LDR) BT (<i>n</i> = 6), high-dose-rate (HDR) BT (<i>n</i> = 2), nodal radiation therapy (RT) + hormonotherapy (<i>n</i> = 2), hormonotherapy alone (<i>n</i> = 1), and prostatectomy (<i>n</i> = 1). Thirty-five patients (92.1%) remained alive (12 with biochemical failure) at the final follow-up, while three patients died of other causes. A slight impairment was observed on all EPIC domains (urinary incontinence, urinary obstruction, bowel, sexual, and hormonal summaries). Compared with the WGBT cohort, urinary irritative/obstructive scores were significantly lower (<i>p</i> = 0.002). At 5 years, biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) was 54% in the HGBT group vs. 95% in the WGBT cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, patients treated with hemi-gland brachytherapy had significantly higher biochemical failure and contralateral relapse rates than a historical cohort of patients treated with WGBT. Larger, well-designed clinical trials are needed to better assess the efficacy of HGBT in the treatment of low-risk PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 5","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145670518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Long-course chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost is one of the acceptable treatment options for watch-and-wait (W&W) eligible rectal cancer patients. However, MRI acquisition, planning, and treatment delivery delays can affect patient satisfaction and treatment success. This study used the classical quality improvement methodology to optimise the MRI-based rectal brachytherapy process.
Material and methods: A multidisciplinary core team was formed, including a radiation oncologist, radiologist, medical physicist, specialist technologist and nurse. Data on wait times from MRI to brachytherapy treatment were collected for patients receiving rectal brachytherapy between August and November 2022. We aimed to reduce the number of days of the gap between the planning MRI day and the treatment delivery day from a median (Dmedian) and mean (Dmean) of 14 and 15 days, respectively, to < 1 day each (primary goal) and to increase the number of same-day treatments (D0%) from currently 0% to at least 70% (secondary goal) by 31st January 2023. The balancing measure was treatment errors or delays. Quality improvement measures were implemented using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.
Results: The post-implementation data at PDSA 1 and 2 from 14 patients each were analysed. The post-change Dmedian, Dmean and D0% improved to 3, 3 days and 35.7% for PDSA 1. This further improved to zero, 0.2 days and 78.9%, respectively, for PDSA 2. A sustained shift in the process was apparent on a control run chart, suggesting sustainability. Further in the sustenance phase, the Dmedian, Dmean and D0% were maintained at 0.3, 0 days and 74%, respectively, for over 42 patients.
Conclusions: Using the classical quality improvement methodology, we sustainably reduced the delay between the planning MRI day and the treatment delivery day. These strategies may serve as a model for other institutions implementing MRI-based brachytherapy programmes for the W&W approach in suitable rectal cancer patients.
{"title":"Quality improvement methodology implementation for timely MRI-based brachytherapy treatment delivery in watch-and-wait expectant rectal cancer patients.","authors":"Rahul Krishnatry, Akshay Dinesan, Manideep Peddi, Shivakumar Gudi, Akshay Baheti, Yogesh G Ghadi, Satish Kohle, Reena Engineer","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2025.153777","DOIUrl":"10.5114/jcb.2025.153777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Long-course chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost is one of the acceptable treatment options for watch-and-wait (W&W) eligible rectal cancer patients. However, MRI acquisition, planning, and treatment delivery delays can affect patient satisfaction and treatment success. This study used the classical quality improvement methodology to optimise the MRI-based rectal brachytherapy process.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary core team was formed, including a radiation oncologist, radiologist, medical physicist, specialist technologist and nurse. Data on wait times from MRI to brachytherapy treatment were collected for patients receiving rectal brachytherapy between August and November 2022. We aimed to reduce the number of days of the gap between the planning MRI day and the treatment delivery day from a median (D<sub>median</sub>) and mean (D<sub>mean</sub>) of 14 and 15 days, respectively, to < 1 day each (primary goal) and to increase the number of same-day treatments (D<sub>0%</sub>) from currently 0% to at least 70% (secondary goal) by 31<sup>st</sup> January 2023. The balancing measure was treatment errors or delays. Quality improvement measures were implemented using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-implementation data at PDSA 1 and 2 from 14 patients each were analysed. The post-change D<sub>median</sub>, D<sub>mean</sub> and D<sub>0%</sub> improved to 3, 3 days and 35.7% for PDSA 1. This further improved to zero, 0.2 days and 78.9%, respectively, for PDSA 2. A sustained shift in the process was apparent on a control run chart, suggesting sustainability. Further in the sustenance phase, the D<sub>median</sub>, D<sub>mean</sub> and D<sub>0%</sub> were maintained at 0.3, 0 days and 74%, respectively, for over 42 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the classical quality improvement methodology, we sustainably reduced the delay between the planning MRI day and the treatment delivery day. These strategies may serve as a model for other institutions implementing MRI-based brachytherapy programmes for the W&W approach in suitable rectal cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"17 4","pages":"242-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145233946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}