Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Sleep Loss with Balance Performance in Farmers.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health Pub Date : 2021-04-23 DOI:10.13031/jash.14217
Devan Sedlacek, Matthew Beacom, Sabin R Bista, Risto Rautiainen, Ka-Chun Siu
{"title":"Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Sleep Loss with Balance Performance in Farmers.","authors":"Devan Sedlacek,&nbsp;Matthew Beacom,&nbsp;Sabin R Bista,&nbsp;Risto Rautiainen,&nbsp;Ka-Chun Siu","doi":"10.13031/jash.14217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIGHLIGHTS The farming population is at risk of injury due to sleep deprivation. Loss of sleep during previous night affects balance performance in farmers. Objective measures of sleep are more reliable than subjective measures for predicting balance performance. ABSTRACT. This study aimed to investigate the ability of both subjective and objective sleep measures to predict balance difficulty in agricultural workers. Seven male farmers from rural Nebraska were analyzed for static balance performance following a bout of sleep. Actiwatches were used to measure objective sleep hours and subjective questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, were used to measure subjective hours of sleep and sleep quality. The participants were observed for 12 sessions, with six in planting season and six in harvest season. Static balance testing consisted of measuring the area, total displacement, and maximum range in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of the individual's center of pressure with Tekscan pressure mats. Overall, it was found that objective measures had a higher correlation with the magnitude of balance deviations than subjective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/jash.14217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS The farming population is at risk of injury due to sleep deprivation. Loss of sleep during previous night affects balance performance in farmers. Objective measures of sleep are more reliable than subjective measures for predicting balance performance. ABSTRACT. This study aimed to investigate the ability of both subjective and objective sleep measures to predict balance difficulty in agricultural workers. Seven male farmers from rural Nebraska were analyzed for static balance performance following a bout of sleep. Actiwatches were used to measure objective sleep hours and subjective questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, were used to measure subjective hours of sleep and sleep quality. The participants were observed for 12 sessions, with six in planting season and six in harvest season. Static balance testing consisted of measuring the area, total displacement, and maximum range in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions of the individual's center of pressure with Tekscan pressure mats. Overall, it was found that objective measures had a higher correlation with the magnitude of balance deviations than subjective measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较农民睡眠损失与平衡表现的客观与主观测量。
由于睡眠不足,农业人口面临受伤的风险。前一晚睡眠不足会影响农民的平衡能力。在预测平衡表现方面,客观的睡眠测量比主观的测量更可靠。摘要本研究旨在探讨主观和客观睡眠测量对农业工人平衡困难的预测能力。对来自内布拉斯加州农村的7名男性农民在睡眠后的静态平衡表现进行了分析。使用活动手表测量客观睡眠时间,使用主观问卷(包括Epworth嗜睡量表和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数)测量主观睡眠时间和睡眠质量。参与者被观察了12次,其中6次在种植季节,6次在收获季节。静平衡测试包括使用Tekscan压力垫测量个体压力中心的前后和中外侧方向的面积、总位移和最大范围。总的来说,我们发现客观测量比主观测量与平衡偏差的大小有更高的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Warning Methods for Remotely Supervised Autonomous Agricultural Machines. Farmers' Perceptions of Grain Bin Entry Hazards. Parents' Risk Acceptance and Attitudes Toward the Use of Quad Bikes by Children and Young People in Sweden. Cultural Factors, Migrant Status, and Vulnerability to Increasing Temperatures among Hispanic/Latino Farmworkers: A Systematic Review. Summary of Known U.S. Injuries and Fatalities Involving Livestock Waste Storage, Handling, and Transport Operations: 1975-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1