Validation of automated positive cell and region detection of immunohistochemically stained laryngeal tumor tissue using digital image analysis

Hilde J.G. Smits , Justin E. Swartz , Marielle E.P. Philippens , Remco de Bree , Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders , Sjors A. Koppes , Gerben E. Breimer , Stefan M. Willems
{"title":"Validation of automated positive cell and region detection of immunohistochemically stained laryngeal tumor tissue using digital image analysis","authors":"Hilde J.G. Smits ,&nbsp;Justin E. Swartz ,&nbsp;Marielle E.P. Philippens ,&nbsp;Remco de Bree ,&nbsp;Johannes H.A.M. Kaanders ,&nbsp;Sjors A. Koppes ,&nbsp;Gerben E. Breimer ,&nbsp;Stefan M. Willems","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to validate a digital image analysis (DIA) workflow for automatic positive cell detection and positive region delineation for immunohistochemical hypoxia markers with a nuclear (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α [HIF-1α]) and a cytoplasmic (pimonidazole [PIMO]) staining pattern.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>101 tissue fragments from 44 laryngeal tumor biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for HIF-1α and PIMO. QuPath was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and to delineate positive regions automatically. For HIF-1α, only cells with strong staining were considered positive. Three dedicated head and neck pathologists scored the percentage of positive cells using three categories (0: &lt;1%; 1: 1%–33%; 2: &gt;33%;). The pathologists also delineated the positive regions on 14 corresponding PIMO and HIF-1α-stained fragments. The consensus between observers was used as the reference standard and was compared to the automatic delineation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Agreement between categorical positivity scores was 76.2% and 65.4% for PIMO and HIF-1α, respectively. In all cases of disagreement in HIF-1α fragments, the DIA underestimated the percentage of positive cells. As for the region detection, the DIA correctly detected most positive regions on PIMO fragments (false positive area=3.1%, false negative area=0.7%). In HIF-1α, the DIA missed some positive regions (false positive area=1.3%, false negative area=9.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Positive cell and region detection on biopsy material is feasible, but further optimization is needed before unsupervised use. Validation at varying DAB staining intensities is hampered by lack of reliability of the gold standard (i.e., visual human interpretation). Nevertheless, the DIA method has the potential to be used as a tool to assist pathologists in the analysis of IHC staining.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to validate a digital image analysis (DIA) workflow for automatic positive cell detection and positive region delineation for immunohistochemical hypoxia markers with a nuclear (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α [HIF-1α]) and a cytoplasmic (pimonidazole [PIMO]) staining pattern.

Materials and methods

101 tissue fragments from 44 laryngeal tumor biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for HIF-1α and PIMO. QuPath was used to determine the percentage of positive cells and to delineate positive regions automatically. For HIF-1α, only cells with strong staining were considered positive. Three dedicated head and neck pathologists scored the percentage of positive cells using three categories (0: <1%; 1: 1%–33%; 2: >33%;). The pathologists also delineated the positive regions on 14 corresponding PIMO and HIF-1α-stained fragments. The consensus between observers was used as the reference standard and was compared to the automatic delineation.

Results

Agreement between categorical positivity scores was 76.2% and 65.4% for PIMO and HIF-1α, respectively. In all cases of disagreement in HIF-1α fragments, the DIA underestimated the percentage of positive cells. As for the region detection, the DIA correctly detected most positive regions on PIMO fragments (false positive area=3.1%, false negative area=0.7%). In HIF-1α, the DIA missed some positive regions (false positive area=1.3%, false negative area=9.7%).

Conclusions

Positive cell and region detection on biopsy material is feasible, but further optimization is needed before unsupervised use. Validation at varying DAB staining intensities is hampered by lack of reliability of the gold standard (i.e., visual human interpretation). Nevertheless, the DIA method has the potential to be used as a tool to assist pathologists in the analysis of IHC staining.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用数字图像分析验证免疫组织化学染色喉部肿瘤组织自动阳性细胞和区域检测
目的:通过核(缺氧诱导因子1α [HIF-1α])和细胞质(吡咪唑[PIMO])染色模式,验证数字图像分析(DIA)工作流程对免疫组织化学缺氧标志物的自动阳性细胞检测和阳性区域描绘。材料与方法对44例喉部肿瘤活检101个组织片段进行HIF-1α和PIMO免疫组化染色。使用QuPath来确定阳性细胞的百分比,并自动划定阳性区域。对于HIF-1α,只有染色强烈的细胞被认为是阳性的。三位专门的头颈部病理学家使用三个类别(0:<1%;1: 1% - -33%;2:在33%;)。病理学家还在14个相应的PIMO和hif -1α染色片段上划定了阳性区域。观测者之间的一致意见作为参考标准,并与自动划定进行比较。结果PIMO和HIF-1α分类阳性评分的符合率分别为76.2%和65.4%。在所有HIF-1α片段不一致的情况下,DIA低估了阳性细胞的百分比。在区域检测方面,DIA正确检测出PIMO片段上大部分阳性区域(假阳性面积3.1%,假阴性面积0.7%)。在HIF-1α中,DIA遗漏了部分阳性区域(假阳性面积=1.3%,假阴性面积=9.7%)。结论活检材料的阳性细胞和区域检测是可行的,但在无监督使用前需要进一步优化。在不同DAB染色强度下的验证由于缺乏金标准的可靠性而受到阻碍(即视觉人类解释)。尽管如此,DIA方法有可能被用作辅助病理学家分析免疫组化染色的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
期刊最新文献
Digital mapping of resected cancer specimens: The visual pathology report A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI ViCE: An automated and quantitative program to assess intestinal tissue morphology Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology LVI-PathNet: Segmentation-classification pipeline for detection of lymphovascular invasion in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1