Does multimorbidity result in de-prioritisation of COPD in primary care?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-14 DOI:10.1038/s41533-023-00326-x
Carolina Smith, Mikael Hasselgren, Christer Janson, Marta A Kisiel, Karin Lisspers, Anna Nager, Hanna Sandelowsky, Björn Ställberg, Josefin Sundh, Scott Montgomery
{"title":"Does multimorbidity result in de-prioritisation of COPD in primary care?","authors":"Carolina Smith, Mikael Hasselgren, Christer Janson, Marta A Kisiel, Karin Lisspers, Anna Nager, Hanna Sandelowsky, Björn Ställberg, Josefin Sundh, Scott Montgomery","doi":"10.1038/s41533-023-00326-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to describe factors associated with having COPD regularly reviewed in primary care by a nurse or physician and assess whether there was de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients. We defined de-prioritisation as not having at least one check-up by a physician during a two-year period. Among 713 COPD patients in the Swedish PRAXIS study, 473 (66%) had at least one check-up during the study period (ending in 2014). Patients with check-ups were more likely to have three or more comorbid conditions (31.9% vs. 24.6%) and exacerbations (35.1% vs. 21.7%) than those without. Compared with those without comorbidity, those with three or more diagnoses had increased relative risk ratios (and 95% CI) for consultations discussing COPD with only a physician (5.63 (2.68-11.79)), COPD-nurse only (1.67 (0.83-3.37)) or both (2.11 (1.09-4.06)). COPD patients received more frequent check-ups considering COPD if they had comorbidity or a history of exacerbations. We found no evidence of de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9840635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00326-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe factors associated with having COPD regularly reviewed in primary care by a nurse or physician and assess whether there was de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients. We defined de-prioritisation as not having at least one check-up by a physician during a two-year period. Among 713 COPD patients in the Swedish PRAXIS study, 473 (66%) had at least one check-up during the study period (ending in 2014). Patients with check-ups were more likely to have three or more comorbid conditions (31.9% vs. 24.6%) and exacerbations (35.1% vs. 21.7%) than those without. Compared with those without comorbidity, those with three or more diagnoses had increased relative risk ratios (and 95% CI) for consultations discussing COPD with only a physician (5.63 (2.68-11.79)), COPD-nurse only (1.67 (0.83-3.37)) or both (2.11 (1.09-4.06)). COPD patients received more frequent check-ups considering COPD if they had comorbidity or a history of exacerbations. We found no evidence of de-prioritisation for COPD in multimorbid patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多病同治是否会导致慢性阻塞性肺病在初级保健中不再优先考虑?
本研究旨在描述由护士或医生定期对慢性阻塞性肺病进行初级保健检查的相关因素,并评估多病患者是否存在慢性阻塞性肺病去优先化的情况。我们将 "去优先化 "定义为两年内未接受至少一次医生检查。在瑞典 PRAXIS 研究的 713 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,有 473 人(66%)在研究期间(截至 2014 年)至少接受过一次检查。与未接受检查的患者相比,接受过检查的患者更有可能患有三种或三种以上的合并症(31.9% 对 24.6%)和病情加重(35.1% 对 21.7%)。与没有合并症的患者相比,有三种或三种以上诊断的患者在仅与医生(5.63 (2.68-11.79))、仅与慢性阻塞性肺病护士(1.67 (0.83-3.37))或两者(2.11 (1.09-4.06))讨论慢性阻塞性肺病问题时,咨询的相对风险比(和 95% CI)会增加。如果慢性阻塞性肺病患者合并有慢性阻塞性肺病或有病情加重病史,他们接受检查的频率会更高。我们没有发现有证据表明,在多疾病患者中,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的优先级被降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
期刊最新文献
Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus. Web-based pulmonary telehabilitation: a systematic review. Tackling antibiotic resistance-insights from eHealthResp's educational interventions. The Reliever Reliance Test: evaluating a new tool to address SABA over-reliance. Asthma prescribing trends, inhaler adherence and outcomes: a Real-World Data analysis of a multi-ethnic Asian Asthma population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1