NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine最新文献

Primary care clinicians play a key role in asthma and asthma exacerbation management worldwide because most patients with asthma are treated in primary care settings. The high burden of asthma exacerbations persists and important practice gaps remain, despite continual advances in asthma care. Lack of primary care-specific guidance, uncontrolled asthma, incomplete assessment of exacerbation and asthma control history, and reliance on systemic corticosteroids or short-acting beta₂-agonist-only therapy are challenges clinicians face today with asthma care. Evidence supports the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) + fast-acting bronchodilator treatments when used as needed in response to symptoms to improve asthma control and reduce rates of exacerbations, and the symptoms that occur leading up to an asthma exacerbation provide a window of opportunity to intervene with ICS. Incorporating patient perspectives and preferences when designing asthma regimens will help patients be more engaged in their therapy and may contribute to improved adherence and outcomes. This expert consensus contains 10 Best Practice Advice Points from a panel of primary care clinicians and a patient representative, formed in collaboration with the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG), a clinically led charitable organization that works locally and globally in primary care to improve respiratory health. The panel met virtually and developed a series of best practice statements, which were drafted and subsequently voted on to obtain consensus. Primary care clinicians globally are encouraged to review and adapt these best practice advice points on preventing and managing asthma exacerbations to their local practice patterns to enhance asthma care within their practice.

Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation (WBPTR) can serve as a valuable tool when access to conventional care is limited. This review assesses a series of studies that explore pulmonary telerehabilitation programmes delivered via web-based platforms. The studies involved participants with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Of the 3190 participants, 1697 engaged in WBPTR platforms, while the remaining 1493 comprised the control groups. Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Web-based pulmonary telerehabilitation led to an increase in daily step count (MD 446.66, 95% CI 96.47 to 796.86), though this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Additionally, WBPTR did not yield significant improvements in the six-minute walking test (MD 5.01, 95% CI - 5.19 to 15.21), health-related quality of life as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD - 0.15, 95% CI - 2.24 to 1.95), or the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD 0.17, 95% CI - 0.13 to 0.46). Moreover, there was no significant improvement in dyspnoea-related health status, as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (MD - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.29 to 0.27) or the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (MD - 0.14, 95% CI - 0.43 to 0.14). Based on these findings, this review concludes that WBPTR does not offer substantial advantages over traditional care. While slight improvements in exercise performance were observed, no meaningful enhancements were noted in dyspnoea or quality of life metrics. Overall, WBPTR remains a complementary and accessible option for managing and monitoring COPD patients. However, further research and innovation are required to improve its efficacy and adapt it to various clinical environments.

Antibiotic resistance (AR) poses a significant challenging issue in public health worldwide. This phenomenon led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, making the treatment of respiratory infections increasingly difficult. Educational interventions targeting healthcare professionals are important to improve prescription practices and promote responsible antibiotic use. Digital tools, including clinical decision support systems and mobile applications, have proven to effectively enhance educational interventions and clinical decision-making. The eHealthResp project is one such initiative that includes an online course and a mobile app designed to improve antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). The online course provides clinical information and case studies, whereas the mobile app acts as a clinical decision support system for URTIs diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to analyse the utilization patterns of eHealthResp digital tools among primary care physicians and community pharmacists. Results showed that both physicians and pharmacists (n = 35) had favorable progress and high grades when completing the online course assessment. The mobile app data indicated a diverse range of searched cases with different respiratory symptoms, with the most common being acute nasal discharge and pain when swallowing. Most observations presented mild symptoms for less than seven days, suggesting the occurrence of acute self-limited infections. Despite limitations, digital tools show promise in enhancing patient care outcomes for managing URTIs. Future efforts should focus on expanding participation among health professionals and enhancing educational interventions to promote responsible antibiotic use.

Over-use of SABA is associated with poor asthma control and greater risk of exacerbations and death. Identifying and addressing the beliefs driving SABA over-reliance is key to reducing over-use. This study aimed to assess the utility, impact and acceptability of the Reliever Reliance Test (RRT), a brief patient self-test behaviour-change tool to identify and address SABA over-reliance. Patients with asthma who completed the RRT in Argentina were invited to an online survey exploring the acceptability of the RRT, and its impact on patients' perceptions of SABA and intention to discuss asthma treatment with a doctor. 93 patients completed the questionnaire. The RRT classified 76/93 (82%) as medium-to-high risk of SABA over-reliance (a mindset where SABA is perceived as the most important aspect of asthma treatment), with 73% of these reporting SABA overuse (3 or more times a week). 75% intended to follow the RRT recommendations to review their asthma treatment with their doctor. The RRT is acceptable to patients and was effective at raising awareness of, identifying and addressing SABA over-reliance and encouraging patients to review their treatment with their doctor.

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is the mainstay therapy for asthma, but general adherence is low. There is a paucity of real-world inhaler prescribing and adherence data from Asia and at the population level. To address these gaps, we performed a real-world data analysis of inhaler prescribing pattern and adherence in a multi-ethnic Asian asthma cohort and evaluated the association with asthma outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult asthma patients (aged ≥18 years) treated in the primary and specialist care settings in Singapore between 2015 to 2019. Medication adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), and categorised into good adherence (MPR 0.75-1.2), poor adherence (MPR 0.75) or medication oversupply (MPR > 1.2). All statistical analyses were performed using R Studio. 8023 patients, mean age 57 years, were evaluated between 2015 and 2019. Most patients were receiving primary care (70.4%) and on GINA step 1-3 therapies (78.2%). ICS-long-acting beta-2 agonist (ICS-LABA) users increased over the years especially in the primary care, from 33% to 52%. Correspondingly, inpatient admission and ED visit rates decreased over the years. Between 2015 and 2019, the proportion of patients with poor adherence decreased from 12.8% to 10.5% (for ICS) and from 30.0% to 26.8% (for ICS-LABA) respectively. Factors associated with poor adherence included minority ethnic groups (Odds ratio of MPR 0.75-1.2: 0.73-0.93; compared to Chinese), presence of COPD (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96) and GINA step 4 treatment ladder (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.85). Factors associated with good adherence were male gender (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28), single site of care (OR 1.22 for primary care and OR 1.76 for specialist care), GINA step 2 treatment ladder (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50). Good adherence was also associated with less frequent inpatient admission (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98), greater SABA overdispensing (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.47-1.87) and oral corticosteroids use (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.14). Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence has improved generally, however, poor adherence was observed for patients receiving asthma care in both primary and specialist care, and those from the minority ethnicities.

This post-hoc analysis of the SABINA III study evaluated the association of short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) prescriptions and self-reported over-the-counter (OTC) SABA purchase in the previous 12 months with asthma-related outcomes using multivariable regression models in 4556 patients (mean age, 48.9 years). Of the 2810 patients prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters, 776 (27.6%) also purchased ≥1 SABA OTC. This subset of 776 patients reported the highest disease burden; 73.2% had ≥1 severe exacerbation and 55.7% had uncontrolled asthma. Asthma-related outcomes worsened with any SABA OTC purchase, regardless of SABA prescriptions; disease burden was the highest in patients with ≥3 SABA prescriptions and ≥1 SABA OTC purchase vs 1-2 SABA prescriptions only (86% lower odds of having at least partly controlled asthma and 124% increased incidence of severe asthma (both P < 0.001). These findings emphasize the need to implement policy changes to restrict SABA purchase without prescriptions and ensure access to affordable asthma care.

Physical activity (PA) improves dyspnoea, psychological wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) for people with COPD reducing their risk of exacerbation. However, engagement in PA is low especially amongst those with anxiety and depression, and PA programmes are limited in countries with limited resources such as Brazil. We explored perceptions of 21 people with COPD about the impact of their disease on taking part in community-based PA programmes in Sao Paulo, Brazil through semi-structured telephone interviews from October 2020 to April 2021. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the Framework method. Five themes were identified: Knowledge about COPD and its management; Self-perception of life with COPD; Knowledge and experiences of depression and anxiety; Opinions on PA and repercussions of COVID-19. PA was considered to be important in bringing physical and mental health benefits but there were barriers in accessibility of formal PR programmes and therefore local community PA programmes were considered to be important. People with mental health conditions tended to view PA more negatively. COVID-19 had reduced PA opportunities, access to COPD treatment and social interaction, and was associated with more exacerbations and emotional suffering. In general, this study showed an urgent need to improve knowledge about COPD and its risk factors and management among both patients, the public and primary healthcare professionals. We provide important content for the formulation of public policies for the implementation of specific activity programmes for people with COPD in community spaces using local resources and intersectoral partnerships.

We aimed to evaluate short-term effects of a web-based self-management support on objectively measured physical activity (PA) compared to usual care in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial including people with stable COPD within primary healthcare. Participants were randomised to intervention group, IG (access to the COPD Web, an interactive website to support self-management with focus on PA), or to control group, CG (usual care). Primary outcome at 3 months was change in accelerometry-measured daily steps analysed with ANCOVA, and secondary outcomes were self-reported PA, disease-related symptoms, and quality of life. Missing data in intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were multiply imputed. One hundred and forty-six participants (n = 73/group), mean (SD) age 69.5 (6.7) years, FEV_1pred 60.7 (19.1)% were included. The ITT analysis showed no significant difference in steps between the groups: 1295 steps (95% CI: [-365, 2955], p = 0.12), while the complete case analysis (n = 98) revealed a significant difference of 1492 steps (95% CI: [374, 2609], p = 0.01) in favour of IG. A significant increase in self-reported PA was seen in IG in both the ITT and complete case analysis. In summary, access to the COPD Web was insufficient to increase short-term PA level compared to usual care. However, among participants with complete step data, a clinically relevant effect on daily steps exceeding the minimal important difference was observed, partly explained by higher baseline PA than among dropouts. This indicates that access to the COPD Web may increase PA levels for some people with COPD.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic illnesses affecting children. Long-term asthma control medications (LTACMs) are an important aspect of asthma management, with under-prescription associated with poor asthma control and increased asthma deaths. This study aimed to document temporal trends in the prescribing of LTACMs for paediatric patients for asthma-related presentations to Australian general practice registrars (trainees). Longitudinal analyses of data from 2010 to 2022 from the Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training study were undertaken. Proportions of paediatric presentations where LTACMs were prescribed were calculated, and temporal trends analysed and graphed. There was no change over time in registrar prescribing of LTACMs for paediatric asthma, although temporal changes were seen in the types of LTACMs prescribed. The lack of temporal increase in overall LTACMs prescription, despite evidence showing their importance in preventing asthma morbidity and mortality, has significant educational, clinical, and policy implications.

Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMS) are questionnaires developed to assess the patient experience¹ and incorporate a vision of patient centered care as a new element of value in the quality of healthcare. The PREM-C9 was developed and tested recently in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CODP). The aim of the current study was to test the validity and reliability of the PREM-C9 in Spanish and Catalan. 239 patients with COPD completed the PREM-C9 (male 68.9%; female 30.2%). Internal consistency was high for both the Spanish [Cronbach's alpha=0.802] and Catalan [Cronbach's alpha=0.875] versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) proved the item distribution and dimensional structure of the questionnaire except for item2 of the scale "My everyday life with COPD". Goodness-of-fit indices were very close to acceptable values for the CFI/TLI of 0.90. Two of the three hypotheses tested to assess known groups' validity were confirmed, with statistically significant differences found between response categories on the satisfaction (p < 0.001) and breathlessness (p = 0.023) scales. No statistically significant differences were observed between the different categories for the education variable. The finding that educational level was not associated with PREM-C9 scores was supported by the results of the multiple regression analysis, which also showed that overall lower levels of overall satisfaction with health services and a greater degree of breathlessness were associated with poorer scores on the PREM-C9. This study has provided evidence for good reliability and structural and construct validity of the Catalan and Spanish versions of the PREM-C9.