Association between diabetes-related distress and glycemic control in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Egypt.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Family and Community Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-29 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_238_22
Sally F Elotla, Ahmed M Fouad, Samar F Mohamed, Anwar I Joudeh, Mona Mostafa, Samer El Hayek, Jaffer Shah, Hazem A S Ahmed
{"title":"Association between diabetes-related distress and glycemic control in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Egypt.","authors":"Sally F Elotla, Ahmed M Fouad, Samar F Mohamed, Anwar I Joudeh, Mona Mostafa, Samer El Hayek, Jaffer Shah, Hazem A S Ahmed","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_238_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes-related distress and glycemic control are of a particular concern to primary care physicians because of the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on diabetic patients' lifestyle, psychological well-being and healthcare access. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between diabetes-related distress and glycemic control in diabetic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care settings during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at primary healthcare clinics in a rural area in Egypt among 430 patients with T2DM during the period from September 2020 to June 2021. All patients were interviewed for their sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics. Diabetes-related distress was measured by the problem areas in the diabetes scale (PAID), where a total score of ≥40 indicated a severe diabetes-related distress. The most recent glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements were used to indicate the glycemic control. Quantile regression model (0.50 quantile) was used to perform the multivariate analysis to identify significant factors associated with HbA1c level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants had a suboptimal glycemic control (92.3%), while 13.3% had severe diabetes-related distress. HbA1c level was significantly and positively correlated with the total PAID score and all its sub-domains. Multivariate quantile regression revealed that obesity, multi-morbidity, and severe diabetes-related distress were the only significant determinants of the HbA1c median level. Obese patients had significantly higher median HbA1c compared to patients who were not obese (coefficient = 0.25, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with two or more comorbidities (i.e., multimorbidity) had a significantly higher median HbA1c than patients with single or no chronic comorbidities (coefficient = 0.41, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Severe diabetes-related distress was significantly associated with higher median HbA1c compared to nonsevere diabetes-related distress (coefficient = 0.20, <i>P</i> = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diabetes-related distress had a significant association with HbA1c level. Family physicians should implement multifaceted programs to optimize diabetes control and reduce any associated distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":46862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/05/JFCM-30-42.PMC9954422.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_238_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes-related distress and glycemic control are of a particular concern to primary care physicians because of the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on diabetic patients' lifestyle, psychological well-being and healthcare access. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between diabetes-related distress and glycemic control in diabetic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care settings during the pandemic.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at primary healthcare clinics in a rural area in Egypt among 430 patients with T2DM during the period from September 2020 to June 2021. All patients were interviewed for their sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical characteristics. Diabetes-related distress was measured by the problem areas in the diabetes scale (PAID), where a total score of ≥40 indicated a severe diabetes-related distress. The most recent glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements were used to indicate the glycemic control. Quantile regression model (0.50 quantile) was used to perform the multivariate analysis to identify significant factors associated with HbA1c level.

Results: Most of the participants had a suboptimal glycemic control (92.3%), while 13.3% had severe diabetes-related distress. HbA1c level was significantly and positively correlated with the total PAID score and all its sub-domains. Multivariate quantile regression revealed that obesity, multi-morbidity, and severe diabetes-related distress were the only significant determinants of the HbA1c median level. Obese patients had significantly higher median HbA1c compared to patients who were not obese (coefficient = 0.25, P < 0.001). Patients with two or more comorbidities (i.e., multimorbidity) had a significantly higher median HbA1c than patients with single or no chronic comorbidities (coefficient = 0.41, P < 0.001). Severe diabetes-related distress was significantly associated with higher median HbA1c compared to nonsevere diabetes-related distress (coefficient = 0.20, P = 0.018).

Conclusion: Diabetes-related distress had a significant association with HbA1c level. Family physicians should implement multifaceted programs to optimize diabetes control and reduce any associated distress.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行期间2型糖尿病初级保健患者的糖尿病相关痛苦与血糖控制之间的关联。
背景:由于2019冠状病毒病大流行对糖尿病患者的生活方式、心理健康和医疗保健的影响,糖尿病相关的痛苦和血糖控制是初级保健医生特别关注的问题。我们的目的是评估疫情期间初级保健环境中2型糖尿病(T2DM)糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关痛苦与血糖控制之间的关系。材料和方法:这项横断面研究是在2020年9月至2021年6月期间,在埃及农村地区的初级保健诊所对430名T2DM患者进行的。所有患者都接受了社会人口学、生活方式和临床特征的访谈。糖尿病相关的痛苦是通过糖尿病量表(PAID)中的问题区域来衡量的,其中总分≥40表示严重的糖尿病相关痛苦。最近的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量用于指示血糖控制。使用分位数回归模型(0.50分位数)进行多变量分析,以确定与HbA1c水平相关的显著因素。结果:大多数参与者的血糖控制不理想(92.3%),而13.3%的参与者有严重的糖尿病相关痛苦。HbA1c水平与PAID总分及其所有亚结构域呈显著正相关。多元分位数回归显示,肥胖、多发病率和严重糖尿病相关的痛苦是HbA1c中位数水平的唯一重要决定因素。与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者的中位HbA1c明显更高(系数=0.25,P<0.001)。患有两种或两种以上合并症(即多发性疾病)的患者的中位数HbA1c显著高于患有单一或无慢性合并症的患者(系数=0.41,P<0.001HbA1c与非严重糖尿病相关痛苦的比较(系数=0.20,P=0.018)。结论:糖尿病相关痛苦与HbA1c水平显著相关。家庭医生应该实施多方面的计划来优化糖尿病控制并减少任何相关的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Journal of Family and Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of depression among the elderly persons with disabilities in Indonesia. Effect of concept mapping model on critical thinking skills of family medicine residents: A randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of the use of clickers versus group discussion in learning by undergraduate medical students. Early detection system of risk factors for diabetes mellitus type 2 utilization of machine learning-random forest. Outcomes of home-isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Bahrain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1