Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Family and Community Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-29 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22
Nasser M Amer, Mosab A Alarfaj, Sharifah A Othman, Shadi Alshammary, Eiman M Alshammari
{"title":"Emergency versus elective cholecystectomy: Experience at a university hospital in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Nasser M Amer,&nbsp;Mosab A Alarfaj,&nbsp;Sharifah A Othman,&nbsp;Shadi Alshammary,&nbsp;Eiman M Alshammari","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for treating most gallbladder pathology, has become the most trusted elective procedure for treating gallstone disease because of its effectiveness and safety. While the timing is an important factor in those cases, our aim in this study was to compare emergency and elective LC, determine the differences in postoperative complications, and assess the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included a total of 627 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during 2017-2019 at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU). Records of both emergency and elective cases were reviewed from Quadra-med (software package). All demographic data of the patients, presenting complaint, laboratory and inflammatory marker, type of the operation, intraoperative complications, procedure time, conversion rate from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, postoperative period, length of hospital stay, and pathological diagnosis were entered into an Excel sheet. The data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. Qualitative variables were described as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were summarized with mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test, <i>t</i>-test, and the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test were applied to test for statistical significance at <i>P</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age for patients undergoing elective LC was 39.94 years (SD=13.56) whereas, mean age of patients undergoing emergency LC was 40.64 years (SD=13.02). About 71% of cases in elective LC group were females compared to 55% in the emergency LC group. There was a significant difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to the type of surgery where <i>P</i> < 0.05. Twelve (1.9%) patients had subtotal cholecystectomy and two cases converted from LC to open. There was a significant association between postoperative complication and the type of surgery. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was also found to be significantly more in patients having emergency LC (6.0 vs. 4.5 d; <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relation between conversion to an open procedure and type of surgery (elective or emergency) in our study was nonsignificant. There was a significant association between preoperative CRP, postoperative complication, length of hospital stay, and type of surgery. Further multicenter studies are required for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","volume":"30 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/20/JFCM-30-37.PMC9954423.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_116_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the procedure of choice for treating most gallbladder pathology, has become the most trusted elective procedure for treating gallstone disease because of its effectiveness and safety. While the timing is an important factor in those cases, our aim in this study was to compare emergency and elective LC, determine the differences in postoperative complications, and assess the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy.

Materials and methods: This study included a total of 627 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during 2017-2019 at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU). Records of both emergency and elective cases were reviewed from Quadra-med (software package). All demographic data of the patients, presenting complaint, laboratory and inflammatory marker, type of the operation, intraoperative complications, procedure time, conversion rate from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, postoperative period, length of hospital stay, and pathological diagnosis were entered into an Excel sheet. The data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. Qualitative variables were described as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were summarized with mean and standard deviation (SD). Chi-square test, t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test were applied to test for statistical significance at P ≤ 0.05.

Results: The mean age for patients undergoing elective LC was 39.94 years (SD=13.56) whereas, mean age of patients undergoing emergency LC was 40.64 years (SD=13.02). About 71% of cases in elective LC group were females compared to 55% in the emergency LC group. There was a significant difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) in relation to the type of surgery where P < 0.05. Twelve (1.9%) patients had subtotal cholecystectomy and two cases converted from LC to open. There was a significant association between postoperative complication and the type of surgery. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was also found to be significantly more in patients having emergency LC (6.0 vs. 4.5 d; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The relation between conversion to an open procedure and type of surgery (elective or emergency) in our study was nonsignificant. There was a significant association between preoperative CRP, postoperative complication, length of hospital stay, and type of surgery. Further multicenter studies are required for further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊与选择性胆囊切除术:沙特阿拉伯东部省一所大学医院的经验。
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是治疗大多数胆囊病理的首选手术,由于其有效性和安全性,已成为治疗胆囊结石疾病最值得信赖的选择性手术。虽然时间是这些病例的一个重要因素,但我们在本研究中的目的是比较急诊和选择性LC,确定术后并发症的差异,并评估胆囊切除术的转化率。材料和方法:本研究纳入了2017-2019年在法赫德国王医院(KFHU)接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的627名患者。从Quadra med(软件包)中回顾了急诊和择期病例的记录。将患者的所有人口统计数据、主诉、实验室和炎症标志物、手术类型、术中并发症、手术时间、腹腔镜胆囊切除术到开腹胆囊切除术的转化率、术后时间、住院时间和病理诊断输入Excel表中。数据采用SPSS 23.0。定性变量被描述为频率和百分比,连续变量被总结为平均值和标准差(SD)。应用卡方检验、t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验检验P≤0.05时的统计学显著性。结果:接受选择性LC的患者的平均年龄为39.94岁(SD=13.56),而接受急诊LC的患者平均年龄为40.64岁(SD=1.302)。选择性LC组约71%的病例为女性,而急诊LC组为55%。C反应蛋白(CRP)与手术类型之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。12例(1.9%)患者进行了胆囊大部切除术,2例从LC转为开腹。术后并发症与手术类型之间存在显著相关性。急诊LC患者的住院时间(LOS)也明显更长(6.0天vs.4.5天;P<0.05)。结论:在我们的研究中,转为开放手术与手术类型(选择性或急诊)之间的关系并不显著。术前CRP、术后并发症、住院时间和手术类型之间存在显著相关性。需要进一步的多中心研究进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family and Community Medicine
Journal of Family and Community Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of depression among the elderly persons with disabilities in Indonesia. Effect of concept mapping model on critical thinking skills of family medicine residents: A randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of the use of clickers versus group discussion in learning by undergraduate medical students. Early detection system of risk factors for diabetes mellitus type 2 utilization of machine learning-random forest. Outcomes of home-isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Bahrain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1