Immune function during pregnancy varies between ecologically distinct populations.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Pub Date : 2020-07-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1093/emph/eoaa022
Carmen Hové, Benjamin C Trumble, Amy S Anderson, Jonathan Stieglitz, Hillard Kaplan, Michael D Gurven, Aaron D Blackwell
{"title":"Immune function during pregnancy varies between ecologically distinct populations.","authors":"Carmen Hové, Benjamin C Trumble, Amy S Anderson, Jonathan Stieglitz, Hillard Kaplan, Michael D Gurven, Aaron D Blackwell","doi":"10.1093/emph/eoaa022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Among placental mammals, females undergo immunological shifts during pregnancy to accommodate the fetus (i.e. fetal tolerance). Fetal tolerance has primarily been characterized within post-industrial populations experiencing evolutionarily novel conditions (e.g. reduced pathogen exposure), which may shape maternal response to fetal antigens. This study investigates how ecological conditions affect maternal immune status during pregnancy by comparing the direction and magnitude of immunological changes associated with each trimester among the Tsimane (a subsistence population subjected to high pathogen load) and women in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data from the Tsimane Health and Life History Project (<i>N</i> = 935) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (<i>N</i> = 1395) were used to estimate population-specific effects of trimester on differential leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both populations, pregnancy was associated with increased neutrophil prevalence, reduced lymphocyte and eosinophil count and elevated CRP. Compared to their US counterparts, pregnant Tsimane women exhibited elevated lymphocyte and eosinophil counts, fewer neutrophils and monocytes and lower CRP. Total leukocyte count remained high and unchanged among pregnant Tsimane women while pregnant US women exhibited substantially elevated counts, resulting in overlapping leukocyte prevalence among all third-trimester individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings indicate that ecological conditions shape non-pregnant immune baselines and the magnitude of immunological shifts during pregnancy via developmental constraints and current trade-offs. Future research should investigate how such flexibility impacts maternal health and disease susceptibility, particularly the degree to which chronic pathogen exposure might dampen inflammatory response to fetal antigens.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>This study compares immunological changes associated with pregnancy between the Tsimane (an Amazonian subsistence population) and individuals in the USA. Results suggest that while pregnancy enhances non-specific defenses and dampens both antigen-specific immunity and parasite/allergy response, ecological conditions strongly influence immune baselines and the magnitude of shifts during gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12156,"journal":{"name":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","volume":"2020 1","pages":"114-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoaa022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Among placental mammals, females undergo immunological shifts during pregnancy to accommodate the fetus (i.e. fetal tolerance). Fetal tolerance has primarily been characterized within post-industrial populations experiencing evolutionarily novel conditions (e.g. reduced pathogen exposure), which may shape maternal response to fetal antigens. This study investigates how ecological conditions affect maternal immune status during pregnancy by comparing the direction and magnitude of immunological changes associated with each trimester among the Tsimane (a subsistence population subjected to high pathogen load) and women in the USA.

Methodology: Data from the Tsimane Health and Life History Project (N = 935) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (N = 1395) were used to estimate population-specific effects of trimester on differential leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation.

Results: In both populations, pregnancy was associated with increased neutrophil prevalence, reduced lymphocyte and eosinophil count and elevated CRP. Compared to their US counterparts, pregnant Tsimane women exhibited elevated lymphocyte and eosinophil counts, fewer neutrophils and monocytes and lower CRP. Total leukocyte count remained high and unchanged among pregnant Tsimane women while pregnant US women exhibited substantially elevated counts, resulting in overlapping leukocyte prevalence among all third-trimester individuals.

Conclusions and implications: Our findings indicate that ecological conditions shape non-pregnant immune baselines and the magnitude of immunological shifts during pregnancy via developmental constraints and current trade-offs. Future research should investigate how such flexibility impacts maternal health and disease susceptibility, particularly the degree to which chronic pathogen exposure might dampen inflammatory response to fetal antigens.

Lay summary: This study compares immunological changes associated with pregnancy between the Tsimane (an Amazonian subsistence population) and individuals in the USA. Results suggest that while pregnancy enhances non-specific defenses and dampens both antigen-specific immunity and parasite/allergy response, ecological conditions strongly influence immune baselines and the magnitude of shifts during gestation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怀孕期间的免疫功能因生态不同的人群而异。
背景和目的:在胎盘哺乳动物中,雌性在怀孕期间经历免疫变化以适应胎儿(即胎儿耐受)。胎儿耐受性主要是在经历进化新条件(例如病原体暴露减少)的后工业化人群中表现出来的,这可能会影响母体对胎儿抗原的反应。本研究通过比较美国提斯曼人(一种受高病原体负荷影响的自给人口)和妇女在每个妊娠期的免疫变化方向和幅度,探讨了生态条件如何影响孕妇的免疫状态。方法:采用来自Tsimane健康和生活史项目(N = 935)和国家健康和营养检查调查(N = 1395)的数据来估计孕期对差异白细胞计数和c反应蛋白(CRP)的人群特异性影响,c反应蛋白是全身性炎症的标志。结果:在这两个人群中,怀孕与中性粒细胞患病率增加、淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数减少以及CRP升高有关。与美国孕妇相比,提斯曼孕妇的淋巴细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高,中性粒细胞和单核细胞减少,CRP降低。齐曼孕妇的白细胞总数仍然很高,没有变化,而美国孕妇的白细胞总数明显升高,导致所有妊娠晚期个体的白细胞患病率重叠。结论和意义:我们的研究结果表明,生态条件通过发育限制和当前权衡,塑造了非怀孕期免疫基线和怀孕期间免疫变化的幅度。未来的研究应该调查这种灵活性如何影响孕产妇健康和疾病易感性,特别是慢性病原体暴露可能在多大程度上抑制对胎儿抗原的炎症反应。摘要:本研究比较了Tsimane(亚马逊生存人口)和美国个体与怀孕相关的免疫变化。结果表明,虽然妊娠增强了非特异性防御,抑制了抗原特异性免疫和寄生虫/过敏反应,但生态条件强烈影响妊娠期间的免疫基线和变化幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Founded by Stephen Stearns in 2013, Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health is an open access journal that publishes original, rigorous applications of evolutionary science to issues in medicine and public health. It aims to connect evolutionary biology with the health sciences to produce insights that may reduce suffering and save lives. Because evolutionary biology is a basic science that reaches across many disciplines, this journal is open to contributions on a broad range of topics.
期刊最新文献
Survival of quick problem solver! Sexual conflict over sex-an underappreciated consequence of childbirth? Lonely, stressed-out moms: Does the postindustrial social experience put women at risk for perinatal mood disorders? How market integration impacts human disease ecology. Phenome-wide association study of population-differentiating genetic variants around gene ACSL1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1