Understanding patient preferences for handheld autoinjectors versus wearable large-volume injectors.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/17425247.2022.2162037
Andreas Schneider, Harald Kolrep, Hanns-Peter Horn, Christoph Jordi, Sina Gierig, Jakob Lange
{"title":"Understanding patient preferences for handheld autoinjectors versus wearable large-volume injectors.","authors":"Andreas Schneider,&nbsp;Harald Kolrep,&nbsp;Hanns-Peter Horn,&nbsp;Christoph Jordi,&nbsp;Sina Gierig,&nbsp;Jakob Lange","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2022.2162037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While interest in the use of wearable large-volume injectors for subcutaneous drug delivery is increasing, it remains unclear whether and under what conditions these emerging dosing options are preferred over more frequent but shorter administration of smaller doses using handheld autoinjectors. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the characteristics of patients diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases, and treatment attributes that determine device preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a cross-sectional online choice experiment, 191 participants expressed their preferences without being physically exposed to the devices or performing injections. Logistic hierarchical regression models were used to assess which patient characteristics, and how changes in treatment attributes, drive device preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant quality of life reduced the likelihood of preferring wearable large-volume injectors to handheld autoinjectors. Moreover, reducing injection frequency from biweekly to monthly to quarterly injections, and shortening injection duration from 33 to 8 min, significantly increased the likelihood of patients preferring large-volume injectors to autoinjectors (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed patient quality of life as predictor of device preference and identified critical inflection points in injection duration and injection frequency, at which patient preferences shift from handheld autoinjectors to wearable large-volume injectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12229,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2022.2162037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: While interest in the use of wearable large-volume injectors for subcutaneous drug delivery is increasing, it remains unclear whether and under what conditions these emerging dosing options are preferred over more frequent but shorter administration of smaller doses using handheld autoinjectors. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the characteristics of patients diagnosed with cancer, diabetes, inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases, and treatment attributes that determine device preferences.

Methods: Based on a cross-sectional online choice experiment, 191 participants expressed their preferences without being physically exposed to the devices or performing injections. Logistic hierarchical regression models were used to assess which patient characteristics, and how changes in treatment attributes, drive device preferences.

Results: Participant quality of life reduced the likelihood of preferring wearable large-volume injectors to handheld autoinjectors. Moreover, reducing injection frequency from biweekly to monthly to quarterly injections, and shortening injection duration from 33 to 8 min, significantly increased the likelihood of patients preferring large-volume injectors to autoinjectors (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The study revealed patient quality of life as predictor of device preference and identified critical inflection points in injection duration and injection frequency, at which patient preferences shift from handheld autoinjectors to wearable large-volume injectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解患者对手持式自动注射器与可穿戴式大容量注射器的偏好。
目的:虽然人们对使用可穿戴式大容量注射器进行皮下给药的兴趣正在增加,但目前尚不清楚这些新兴的给药选择是否以及在什么条件下优于使用手持式自动注射器进行更频繁但更短时间的小剂量给药。因此,本研究的目的是研究诊断为癌症、糖尿病、炎症和心血管疾病的患者的特征,以及决定设备偏好的治疗属性。方法:基于横断面在线选择实验,191名参与者在没有身体接触设备或进行注射的情况下表达了他们的偏好。使用逻辑层次回归模型来评估哪些患者特征以及治疗属性的变化如何驱动设备偏好。结果:参与者的生活质量降低了选择可穿戴式大容量注射器的可能性,而不是手持式自动注射器。此外,减少注射频率,从两周注射到每月注射到每季度注射,并将注射时间从33分钟缩短到8分钟,显著增加了患者选择大容量注射器而不是自动注射器的可能性(p)。该研究揭示了患者的生活质量是设备偏好的预测因素,并确定了注射时间和注射频率的关键拐点,在这个拐点上,患者的偏好从手持式自动注射器转向了可穿戴式大容量注射器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery (ISSN 1742-5247 [print], 1744-7593 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles covering all aspects of drug delivery research, from initial concept to potential therapeutic application and final relevance in clinical use. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Alternative routes for parenteral nucleic acid delivery and related hurdles: highlights in RNA delivery Sustained intra-cellular siRNA release from Poly(hypenCapswithspaceRetainColl1rginine) multilayered nanoparticles for prolonged gene silencing. Development of in vitro biopharmaceutics tools for predicting the bioavailability of subcutaneously injected monoclonal antibodies and oligonucleotides 3D printed personalized therapies for pediatric patients affected by adrenal insufficiency Redefining drug therapy: innovative approaches using catalytic compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1