Engaging the Houston Community in Research: An Early Case Study of a Community Engagement Core in the University of Houston's HEALTH Center for Addictions Research and Cancer Prevention.

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Behavior and Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.14485/hbpr.9.5.2
Brian J Carter, Lorraine R Reitzel, Tzuan A Chen, LeChauncy Woodard, Ezemenari M Obasi
{"title":"Engaging the Houston Community in Research: An Early Case Study of a Community Engagement Core in the University of Houston's HEALTH Center for Addictions Research and Cancer Prevention.","authors":"Brian J Carter,&nbsp;Lorraine R Reitzel,&nbsp;Tzuan A Chen,&nbsp;LeChauncy Woodard,&nbsp;Ezemenari M Obasi","doi":"10.14485/hbpr.9.5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities-funded U54 Research Center at the University of Houston addresses disparate racial/ethnic health outcomes related to cancer and substance abuse. Of its 4 cores, the Community Engagement Core involves the impacted community in affiliated research. Strategies include implementing community advisory boards, assisting with study design and execution, maintaining a social media presence, and publishing health-related videos for the community. We examine the early effectiveness of these strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection included surveying investigators and community advisory board members and monitoring traffic to videos and social media posts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a Likert scale survey of investigators (4 = \"agree\" and 5 = \"strongly agree\"), the mean rating for a prompt expressing satisfaction with services received was 4.67 (SD = 0.52; N = 6). On a Likert scale survey of community advisory board members, the mean rating for a prompt expressing belief that feedback was taken seriously was 5.00 (SD = 0.00; N = 9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Community Engagement Core is building trusting relationships between researchers and community members. We discuss lessons learned that may inform both our growth and others' efforts to implement community-engaged research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44486,"journal":{"name":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674334/pdf/nihms-1849942.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.9.5.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities-funded U54 Research Center at the University of Houston addresses disparate racial/ethnic health outcomes related to cancer and substance abuse. Of its 4 cores, the Community Engagement Core involves the impacted community in affiliated research. Strategies include implementing community advisory boards, assisting with study design and execution, maintaining a social media presence, and publishing health-related videos for the community. We examine the early effectiveness of these strategies.

Methods: Data collection included surveying investigators and community advisory board members and monitoring traffic to videos and social media posts.

Results: On a Likert scale survey of investigators (4 = "agree" and 5 = "strongly agree"), the mean rating for a prompt expressing satisfaction with services received was 4.67 (SD = 0.52; N = 6). On a Likert scale survey of community advisory board members, the mean rating for a prompt expressing belief that feedback was taken seriously was 5.00 (SD = 0.00; N = 9).

Conclusions: The Community Engagement Core is building trusting relationships between researchers and community members. We discuss lessons learned that may inform both our growth and others' efforts to implement community-engaged research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与休斯顿社区研究:休斯顿大学成瘾研究和癌症预防健康中心社区参与核心的早期案例研究。
目的:休斯顿大学U54研究中心由国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所资助,研究与癌症和药物滥用有关的不同种族/民族健康结果。在它的4个核心中,社区参与核心涉及附属研究中受影响的社区。策略包括建立社区咨询委员会,协助研究设计和执行,保持社交媒体的存在,以及为社区发布与健康相关的视频。我们考察了这些策略的早期有效性。方法:数据收集包括调查人员和社区顾问委员会成员,并监测视频和社交媒体帖子的流量。结果:在调查人员的李克特量表调查(4 =“同意”,5 =“非常同意”)中,对收到的服务表示满意的提示的平均评分为4.67 (SD = 0.52;N = 6)。在对社区顾问委员会成员进行的李克特量表调查中,提示表示相信反馈得到认真对待的平均评分为5.00 (SD = 0.00;结论:社区参与核心是在研究人员和社区成员之间建立信任关系。我们讨论了经验教训,这些教训可能会为我们的发展和其他人实施社区参与研究的努力提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Behavior and Policy Review
Health Behavior and Policy Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
A Reflection on 10 Years of Health Behavior and Policy Review Health and Social Service Needs of People who Inject Drugs Living in Rural Settings in the United States: A Qualitative Study Total vs Partial Workplace Tobacco Use Bans in Texas Behavioral Health Centers: Employees’ Perceptions Related to Best Practices Implementation Improving Water Consumption in Underserved Elementary Schools: Implementation and Evaluation of a School-based Hydration Initiative Social Connections as a Catalyst for Improved Mental Health and Health Behavior among Long-term Survivors of HIV
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1