The Development, Content Validation, and Pilot Testing of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1177/10790632221078297
Georgia M Winters, Elizabeth L Jeglic, Leah E Kaylor
{"title":"The Development, Content Validation, and Pilot Testing of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale.","authors":"Georgia M Winters,&nbsp;Elizabeth L Jeglic,&nbsp;Leah E Kaylor","doi":"10.1177/10790632221078297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence rates of paraphilic interests and disorders in the general population have been understudied, in large part due to the lack of a standardized assessment measure. As a result, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (<i>DSM)-5</i> provides little information regarding the prevalence of paraphilic disorders. The present study involved the development of a self-report measure, <i>Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale</i> (<i>PIDS</i>), that can be used to assess for the eight paraphilic interests/disorders in the <i>DSM-5</i> for use with general population samples. Study 1 established the content validity of the <i>PIDS</i> using feedback from 22 experts in the field, and recommendations from these experts were utilized to modify the measure. In Study 2, the <i>PIDS</i> was piloted on 100 individuals in the general population, which supported the feasibility of implementation and its limited-efficacy. While the <i>PIDS</i> requires further psychometric support, the current research suggests the <i>PIDS</i> is a promising tool to gather self-report, population-based data on <i>DSM-5</i> paraphilic interests and disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":21828,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632221078297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The prevalence rates of paraphilic interests and disorders in the general population have been understudied, in large part due to the lack of a standardized assessment measure. As a result, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 provides little information regarding the prevalence of paraphilic disorders. The present study involved the development of a self-report measure, Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale (PIDS), that can be used to assess for the eight paraphilic interests/disorders in the DSM-5 for use with general population samples. Study 1 established the content validity of the PIDS using feedback from 22 experts in the field, and recommendations from these experts were utilized to modify the measure. In Study 2, the PIDS was piloted on 100 individuals in the general population, which supported the feasibility of implementation and its limited-efficacy. While the PIDS requires further psychometric support, the current research suggests the PIDS is a promising tool to gather self-report, population-based data on DSM-5 paraphilic interests and disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反性恋兴趣和障碍量表的开发、内容验证和试点测试。
由于缺乏标准化的评估措施,对一般人群中性癖好和性障碍的患病率研究不足。因此,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-5提供的关于性反常障碍患病率的信息很少。目前的研究涉及到自我报告测量的发展,恋童癖兴趣和障碍量表(PIDS),可用于评估DSM-5中用于一般人群样本的八种恋童癖兴趣/障碍。研究1利用22位该领域专家的反馈建立了PIDS的内容效度,并利用这些专家的建议对测量进行修改。在研究2中,PIDS在普通人群中进行了100人的试点,这支持了实施的可行性及其有限的有效性。虽然PIDS需要进一步的心理测量支持,但目前的研究表明,PIDS是一个很有前途的工具,可以收集自我报告,基于DSM-5的反性恋兴趣和障碍的人口数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.40%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
"Falling Through the Cracks": A Retrospective Exploration of the Barriers to Help-Seeking Among Men Convicted of Sexual Crimes. Protectors of Society: Understanding the Impact of Courtesy Stigma on the Experiences of Volunteers Working With Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offences. Sexual Recidivism During Treatment: Impact on Therapists. Same Score, Different Audience, Different Message: Perceptions of Sex Offense Risk Depend on Static-99R Risk Level and Personality Factors of the Recipient. Open Versus Closed Group Treatment of Men with a History of Sexual Offenses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1