Temporomandibular Joint Gape Angles in Normal and Painful Domestic Felines.

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Veterinary Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1177/08987564231157591
Emily K Renner, Graham Thatcher, Scott Hetzel, Christopher J Snyder
{"title":"Temporomandibular Joint Gape Angles in Normal and Painful Domestic Felines.","authors":"Emily K Renner, Graham Thatcher, Scott Hetzel, Christopher J Snyder","doi":"10.1177/08987564231157591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the gape angles (temporomandibular joint range of motion with mouth opening) of conscious and anesthetized domestic felines and to compare gape angles with and without evidence of oral pain. This prospective study evaluated the gape angle of 58 domestic felines. The cats were grouped into painful (<i>n</i> = 33) and nonpainful cohorts (<i>n</i> = 25) and gape angles were compared during conscious and anesthetized conditions. Gape angles were determined based on measurements of the maximal interincisal distance and lengths of the mandible and maxilla followed by calculation of the law of cosines. The mean feline gape angle (standard deviation) was determined to be 45.3° (8.6<sup>°</sup>) and 50.8<sup>°</sup> (6.2<sup>°</sup>) for conscious and anesthetized felines respectively. There was no significant difference between painful and non-painful feline gape angles during conscious (<i>P </i>= .613) or anesthetized (<i>P </i>= .605) evaluations. There was a significant difference between anesthetized and conscious gape angles (<i>P </i>< .001) for both painful and non-painful cohorts. This study determined the standardized, normal feline temporomandibular joint (TMJ) gape angle in both conscious and anesthetized states. This study suggests that the feline gape angle is not a useful indicator of oral pain. By determining the feline gape angle, which was previously unknown, further evaluation of its utility as a non-invasive clinical parameter for evaluation of restrictive TMJ motions as well as its use for serial evaluations may be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":17584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08987564231157591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the gape angles (temporomandibular joint range of motion with mouth opening) of conscious and anesthetized domestic felines and to compare gape angles with and without evidence of oral pain. This prospective study evaluated the gape angle of 58 domestic felines. The cats were grouped into painful (n = 33) and nonpainful cohorts (n = 25) and gape angles were compared during conscious and anesthetized conditions. Gape angles were determined based on measurements of the maximal interincisal distance and lengths of the mandible and maxilla followed by calculation of the law of cosines. The mean feline gape angle (standard deviation) was determined to be 45.3° (8.6°) and 50.8° (6.2°) for conscious and anesthetized felines respectively. There was no significant difference between painful and non-painful feline gape angles during conscious (P = .613) or anesthetized (P = .605) evaluations. There was a significant difference between anesthetized and conscious gape angles (P < .001) for both painful and non-painful cohorts. This study determined the standardized, normal feline temporomandibular joint (TMJ) gape angle in both conscious and anesthetized states. This study suggests that the feline gape angle is not a useful indicator of oral pain. By determining the feline gape angle, which was previously unknown, further evaluation of its utility as a non-invasive clinical parameter for evaluation of restrictive TMJ motions as well as its use for serial evaluations may be pursued.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常家猫和疼痛家猫的颞下颌关节咬合角度。
本研究的目的是确定并比较清醒和麻醉家猫的张口角度(张口时颞下颌关节的活动范围),并比较有无口腔疼痛迹象的张口角度。这项前瞻性研究评估了 58 只家猫的张口角度。这些猫被分为疼痛组(33 只)和非疼痛组(25 只),并比较了清醒和麻醉状态下的张口角度。咬合角是根据最大颌间距离以及下颌和上颌长度的测量结果确定的,然后计算余弦定律。经测定,清醒猫科动物和麻醉猫科动物的平均咬合角(标准偏差)分别为 45.3°(8.6°)和 50.8°(6.2°)。在清醒状态(P = .613)或麻醉状态(P = .605)下,疼痛猫科动物和非疼痛猫科动物的咬合角度没有明显差异。麻醉状态下和清醒状态下的猫科动物张口角度有明显差异(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Dentistry
Journal of Veterinary Dentistry VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Dentistry (JOVD) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Foundation for Veterinary Dentistry. The JOVD provides a continuing education forum for veterinary dental scientists, veterinarians, dentists, and veterinary/dental technicians and hygienists who are engaged in veterinary dental practice. JOVD articles provide practical and scientifically sound information covering not only the medical and surgical aspects, but also specific categories as they relate to clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment of Canine Tooth Resorption: A Literature Review. Local Anesthesia. Mandibular Periostitis Ossificans in a 17-Week-Old Male Great Dane. Detection of Oronasal Fistula Using a Fluorescent Water Passing Test. Editorial 42.2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1