Assessment of the dosimetric impact of intra-fraction motion during frameless treatment delivery on GammaKnife® Icon™.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Hannah Taylor, Peter Fallows, Gavin Wright
{"title":"Assessment of the dosimetric impact of intra-fraction motion during frameless treatment delivery on GammaKnife® Icon™.","authors":"Hannah Taylor,&nbsp;Peter Fallows,&nbsp;Gavin Wright","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the impact of patient motion on the dosimetric quality of treatment plans for metastatic patients undergoing frameless GammaKnife<sup>®</sup> Icon™ treatments. By quantifying dosimetric robustness at increasing high definition motion management (HDMM) gating tolerances, this study investigated the possibility of increasing the HDMM threshold for patients treated at our centre from our current standard of 1 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Motion was retrospectively simulated by shifting the stereotactic co-ordinates of shots in treatment plans using three motion models. Dosimetric quality indicators of original and shifted plans were compared. Influence of target location and size was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Motion models showed median (p-value) absolute changes in target coverage of up to -0.133% (<0.0001), -0.267% (<0.0001) and -0.667% (<0.0001) for HDMM tolerances of 1mm, 1.5mm and 3mm. The greatest median (p-value) absolute changes in Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) and Gradient Index (GI) were -0.008 (0.0032) and 0.017 (0.6893). A reduction in target size correlated weakly with greater changes in target coverage for all models and HDMM tolerances (r<sup>2</sup> =0.040-0.309). No location dependence was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HDMM tolerances up to and including 3mm all resulted in negligible changes in PCI and GI. Target coverage exhibited greater sensitivity to motion, but only at 3mm was the target coverage reduced below local planning aims. Our HDMM tolerance could therefore potentially be increased to 1.5mm, with likely benefits to treatment delivery efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 3","pages":"217-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970743/pdf/rsbrt-8-217.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of patient motion on the dosimetric quality of treatment plans for metastatic patients undergoing frameless GammaKnife® Icon™ treatments. By quantifying dosimetric robustness at increasing high definition motion management (HDMM) gating tolerances, this study investigated the possibility of increasing the HDMM threshold for patients treated at our centre from our current standard of 1 mm.

Methods: Motion was retrospectively simulated by shifting the stereotactic co-ordinates of shots in treatment plans using three motion models. Dosimetric quality indicators of original and shifted plans were compared. Influence of target location and size was determined.

Results: Motion models showed median (p-value) absolute changes in target coverage of up to -0.133% (<0.0001), -0.267% (<0.0001) and -0.667% (<0.0001) for HDMM tolerances of 1mm, 1.5mm and 3mm. The greatest median (p-value) absolute changes in Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) and Gradient Index (GI) were -0.008 (0.0032) and 0.017 (0.6893). A reduction in target size correlated weakly with greater changes in target coverage for all models and HDMM tolerances (r2 =0.040-0.309). No location dependence was observed.

Conclusion: HDMM tolerances up to and including 3mm all resulted in negligible changes in PCI and GI. Target coverage exhibited greater sensitivity to motion, but only at 3mm was the target coverage reduced below local planning aims. Our HDMM tolerance could therefore potentially be increased to 1.5mm, with likely benefits to treatment delivery efficiency.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估GammaKnife®Icon™无框架治疗过程中分数内运动的剂量学影响。
本研究调查了患者运动对接受无框GammaKnife®Icon™治疗的转移性患者治疗计划剂量学质量的影响。通过量化增加高清晰度运动管理(HDMM)门控公差的剂量学稳健性,本研究调查了在我们中心治疗的患者从目前的1毫米标准增加HDMM阈值的可能性。方法:通过使用三种运动模型,通过改变治疗计划中镜头的立体定向坐标,回顾性地模拟运动。比较了原方案和变更方案的剂量学质量指标。确定了目标位置和大小的影响。结果:运动模型显示目标覆盖率的中位数(p值)绝对变化高达-0.133%(2 =0.040-0.309)。没有观察到位置依赖性。结论:HDMM≤3mm的耐受性对PCI和GI的影响均可忽略不计。目标覆盖率对运动表现出更大的敏感性,但只有在3mm时,目标覆盖率才低于当地规划目标。因此,我们的HDMM容忍度可能会增加到1.5mm,这可能有利于治疗的输送效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1