Equitable Distribution of Poor Quality of Care? Equity in Quality of Reproductive Health Services in Ethiopia.

Girmaye D Dinsa, Ermias Dessie, Sarah Hurlburt, Yosef Gebreyohannes, Catherine Arsenault, Bereket Yakob, Tsinuel Girma, Peter Berman, Margaret E Kruk
{"title":"Equitable Distribution of Poor Quality of Care? Equity in Quality of Reproductive Health Services in Ethiopia.","authors":"Girmaye D Dinsa,&nbsp;Ermias Dessie,&nbsp;Sarah Hurlburt,&nbsp;Yosef Gebreyohannes,&nbsp;Catherine Arsenault,&nbsp;Bereket Yakob,&nbsp;Tsinuel Girma,&nbsp;Peter Berman,&nbsp;Margaret E Kruk","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2022.2062808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ethiopian health system faces persistent inequities in health-care utilization and outcomes, despite continued efforts to expand health service coverage. There is little evidence in the literature describing the status of equity in the quality of healthcare. This paper aims to understand the disparities in quality of antenatal care (ANC) and family planning (FP) among the poor and non-poor communities. We used the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data to compute a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), and the 2014 Service Provision Assessment (SPA) data to assess quality of ANC and FP services-defined as the level of adherence to World Health Organization (WHO) clinical and service guidelines. We merged the two datasets using geographical coordinates, and aggregated service users into facility catchment area clusters using a 2-km radius for urban and 10-km radius for rural facilities. We computed ANC and FP quality and MPI indices for each facility and assigned these to catchment areas. Using the international cutoff point for deprivation (MPI = 33.3%), we evaluated whether the quality of ANC and FP services varies by poor and non-poor catchment areas. We found that most of catchment areas (75.7%) were deprived. While the overall quality of ANC and FP services are low (33% and 34% respectively), we found little variation in the distribution of the quality of these services between poor and non-poor areas, urban and rural settings, or regionally. The short-term focus needs to be on improving the overall quality of services rather than on its distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2062808"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2022.2062808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Ethiopian health system faces persistent inequities in health-care utilization and outcomes, despite continued efforts to expand health service coverage. There is little evidence in the literature describing the status of equity in the quality of healthcare. This paper aims to understand the disparities in quality of antenatal care (ANC) and family planning (FP) among the poor and non-poor communities. We used the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data to compute a Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), and the 2014 Service Provision Assessment (SPA) data to assess quality of ANC and FP services-defined as the level of adherence to World Health Organization (WHO) clinical and service guidelines. We merged the two datasets using geographical coordinates, and aggregated service users into facility catchment area clusters using a 2-km radius for urban and 10-km radius for rural facilities. We computed ANC and FP quality and MPI indices for each facility and assigned these to catchment areas. Using the international cutoff point for deprivation (MPI = 33.3%), we evaluated whether the quality of ANC and FP services varies by poor and non-poor catchment areas. We found that most of catchment areas (75.7%) were deprived. While the overall quality of ANC and FP services are low (33% and 34% respectively), we found little variation in the distribution of the quality of these services between poor and non-poor areas, urban and rural settings, or regionally. The short-term focus needs to be on improving the overall quality of services rather than on its distribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低质量医疗服务的公平分配?埃塞俄比亚生殖健康服务质量的公平性。
尽管埃塞俄比亚不断努力扩大卫生服务覆盖面,但其卫生系统在卫生保健利用和结果方面仍面临不公平现象。在文献中几乎没有证据描述医疗保健质量的公平状况。本文旨在了解贫困和非贫困社区在产前保健(ANC)和计划生育(FP)质量方面的差异。我们使用2016年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查(DHS)数据来计算多维贫困指数(MPI),并使用2014年服务提供评估(SPA)数据来评估ANC和计划生育服务的质量——定义为遵守世界卫生组织(WHO)临床和服务指南的水平。我们使用地理坐标将两个数据集合并,并使用2公里半径的城市和10公里半径的农村设施将服务用户聚合到设施集水区集群中。我们计算了每个设施的ANC和FP质量以及MPI指数,并将这些指数分配给集水区。利用国际剥夺截断点(MPI = 33.3%),我们评估了贫困和非贫困流域的ANC和计划生育服务质量是否存在差异。我们发现大部分集水区(75.7%)被剥夺了水资源。虽然ANC和计划生育服务的总体质量较低(分别为33%和34%),但我们发现这些服务的质量在贫困地区和非贫困地区、城市和农村环境或区域之间的分布差异很小。短期的重点需要放在提高服务的整体质量上,而不是放在服务的分配上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War. The Impact of Centralized Procurement on Treatment Patterns for Myocardial Infarction and More Principled Utilization of Coronary Stents. Data Integration of Health Financing Systems as a Critical Enabler for Objective-Oriented Health System Reform: A Scoping Review from India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1