Associations between prescription and illicit stimulant and opioid use in the United States, 2015–2020

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108894
Riley D. Shearer , Abenaa Jones , Benjamin A. Howell , Joel E. Segel , Tyler N.A. Winkelman
{"title":"Associations between prescription and illicit stimulant and opioid use in the United States, 2015–2020","authors":"Riley D. Shearer ,&nbsp;Abenaa Jones ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Howell ,&nbsp;Joel E. Segel ,&nbsp;Tyler N.A. Winkelman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Overdose deaths involving opioids and stimulants continue to reach unprecedented levels in the United States. Although significant attention has been paid to the relationship between prescription and illicit opioid use, little work has focused on the association between prescription and illicit stimulant use. Thus, this study explores characteristics of those who use or misuse prescription stimulants and/or opioids and associations with use of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used 2015–2020 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Using adjusted multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the associations between past year prescription stimulant or prescription opioid prescribed use and misuse; various demographic characteristics; and past-year cocaine, methamphetamine, or heroin use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2015 to 2020, 4.9 and 9.8 million US adults annually reported misusing prescription stimulants and opioids, respectively. Individuals who misused prescription stimulants were more likely to be ages 18–25 (45.8 %; 95 % CI: 44.0–47.5) than individuals who misused prescription opioids (21.7 %; 95 % CI: 20.7–22.7). We observed higher rates of cocaine use among individuals reporting prescription stimulant misuse (12.0 %; 95 % CI: 11.0–12.9) compared to those reporting prescription opioid misuse (5.7 %; 95 % CI: 5.1–6.3, p &lt; 0.001). Heroin use was more common among individuals with prescription opioid misuse (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.7–2.2) than prescription stimulant misuse (0.6 %; 95 % CI: 0.4–0.7, p &lt; 0.001). However, rates of methamphetamine use among individuals with prescription stimulant misuse (2.4 %; 95 % CI: 1.9–3.0) did not differ from individuals with prescription opioid misuse (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.7–2.5, p = 0.67).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prescription stimulant misuse, compared to prescription opioid misuse, was associated with higher levels of cocaine use but not methamphetamine use. Treatment providers should consider screening for other substance use disorders among people who report prescription stimulant use or misuse. Additional research should seek to understand the mechanism underlying the different associations between prescription stimulant misuse and cocaine or methamphetamine use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Overdose deaths involving opioids and stimulants continue to reach unprecedented levels in the United States. Although significant attention has been paid to the relationship between prescription and illicit opioid use, little work has focused on the association between prescription and illicit stimulant use. Thus, this study explores characteristics of those who use or misuse prescription stimulants and/or opioids and associations with use of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin.

Methods

We used 2015–2020 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Using adjusted multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the associations between past year prescription stimulant or prescription opioid prescribed use and misuse; various demographic characteristics; and past-year cocaine, methamphetamine, or heroin use.

Results

From 2015 to 2020, 4.9 and 9.8 million US adults annually reported misusing prescription stimulants and opioids, respectively. Individuals who misused prescription stimulants were more likely to be ages 18–25 (45.8 %; 95 % CI: 44.0–47.5) than individuals who misused prescription opioids (21.7 %; 95 % CI: 20.7–22.7). We observed higher rates of cocaine use among individuals reporting prescription stimulant misuse (12.0 %; 95 % CI: 11.0–12.9) compared to those reporting prescription opioid misuse (5.7 %; 95 % CI: 5.1–6.3, p < 0.001). Heroin use was more common among individuals with prescription opioid misuse (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.7–2.2) than prescription stimulant misuse (0.6 %; 95 % CI: 0.4–0.7, p < 0.001). However, rates of methamphetamine use among individuals with prescription stimulant misuse (2.4 %; 95 % CI: 1.9–3.0) did not differ from individuals with prescription opioid misuse (2.1 %; 95 % CI: 1.7–2.5, p = 0.67).

Conclusions

Prescription stimulant misuse, compared to prescription opioid misuse, was associated with higher levels of cocaine use but not methamphetamine use. Treatment providers should consider screening for other substance use disorders among people who report prescription stimulant use or misuse. Additional research should seek to understand the mechanism underlying the different associations between prescription stimulant misuse and cocaine or methamphetamine use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015-2020年美国处方和非法兴奋剂和阿片类药物使用之间的关系
在美国,涉及阿片类药物和兴奋剂的过量死亡人数继续达到前所未有的水平。尽管对处方和非法阿片类药物使用之间的关系给予了极大的关注,但很少有工作集中在处方和非法兴奋剂使用之间的联系上。因此,本研究探讨了那些使用或滥用处方兴奋剂和/或阿片类药物的人的特征以及与可卡因、甲基苯丙胺和海洛因使用的联系。方法采用2015-2020年全国药物使用与健康调查数据。使用调整后的多变量logistic回归,我们估计了过去一年处方兴奋剂或处方阿片类药物处方使用和滥用之间的关联;各种人口特征;以及过去一年吸食可卡因,冰毒或海洛因的情况。从2015年到2020年,每年分别有490万和980万美国成年人报告滥用处方兴奋剂和阿片类药物。滥用处方兴奋剂的人群多为18-25岁(45.8%;95% CI: 44.0-47.5)比滥用处方阿片类药物的个体(21.7%;95% ci: 20.7-22.7)。我们观察到,在报告处方兴奋剂滥用的个体中,可卡因使用率较高(12.0%;95% CI: 11.0-12.9)与报告处方阿片类药物滥用的患者相比(5.7%;95% CI: 5.1-6.3, p <0.001)。海洛因使用在处方阿片类药物滥用者中更为常见(2.1%;95% CI: 1.7-2.2)高于处方兴奋剂滥用(0.6%;95% CI: 0.4-0.7, p <0.001)。然而,处方兴奋剂滥用者的甲基苯丙胺使用率(2.4%;95% CI: 1.9-3.0)与处方阿片类药物滥用个体(2.1%;95% CI: 1.7 ~ 2.5, p = 0.67)。结论与处方阿片类药物滥用相比,处方兴奋剂滥用与更高水平的可卡因使用相关,但与甲基苯丙胺使用无关。治疗提供者应考虑在报告处方兴奋剂使用或滥用的人群中筛查其他物质使用障碍。进一步的研究应设法了解处方兴奋剂滥用与可卡因或甲基苯丙胺使用之间不同联系的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1